Finance and economics | Red dawn

China’s economic model retains a dangerous allure

Despite the country’s current struggles, autocrats elsewhere see a lot to admire

Collage of a world globe with a Chinese yuan bill poking though.
Illustration: Juanjo Gasull
|Singapore

Twenty years ago Joshua Cooper Ramo, a consultant, first wrote about the “Beijing consensus”. The Washington consensus of financial liberalisation, floating currencies and openness to foreign capital was, he posited, a damaged brand. China was pioneering its own approach to development based on principles of equality, innovation and a relentless focus on sovereignty and national security. This would appeal to lots of developing countries.

In the years since, China’s leaders have mostly denied any ambition to export a state-led model of development. But they are sometimes more brazen. Last year, for instance, Xi Jinping argued in a speech to Communist Party officials that the country’s economic model “breaks the myth that modernisation equals Westernisation”, and that its growth was expanding “choices for developing countries”. Leaders past and present in the developing world—from Pakistan’s Imran Khan and Malaysia’s Mahathir Mohamad to Brazil’s Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva and South Africa’s Cyril Ramaphosa—have expounded the benefits of at least some aspects of the model. And since Mr Cooper Ramo first wrote about the Beijing consensus, the Chinese economy has quadrupled in size in real dollar terms, boosting the country’s diplomatic and military sway.

Explore more

This article appeared in the Finance & economics section of the print edition under the headline “Painting the globe red”

A triumph for Indian democracy

From the June 8th 2024 edition

Discover stories from this section and more in the list of contents

Explore the edition

More from Finance and economics

Why Chinese banks are now vanishing

The state is struggling to deal with troubled institutions

How Starbucks caffeinates local economies

Call it the frappuccino effect


How much cash should be removed from the financial system?

Undoing quantitative easing provokes fierce debate


More from Finance and economics

Why Chinese banks are now vanishing

The state is struggling to deal with troubled institutions

How Starbucks caffeinates local economies

Call it the frappuccino effect


How much cash should be removed from the financial system?

Undoing quantitative easing provokes fierce debate


America’s banks are more exposed to a downturn than they appear

To understand why, consider the ouroboros theory of financial risk

What happened to the artificial-intelligence revolution?

So far the technology has had almost no economic impact

Ukraine has a month to avoid default

Lending to a borrower at war entails an additional gamble: that it will win