The Economist explains

What are HARM, the air-to-surface missiles destroying Russian air-defence radar?

America’s supply of the powerful weapons to Ukraine has given its air force a telling advantage

This US Navy photo released 01 April 2003 shows a High Speed Anti-Radiation Missile (HARM)that is positioned on an F/A-18C Hornet during night flight operations 31 March 2003,aboard USS Kitty Hawk (CV 63), in the Gulf. The HARM missile was first deployed aboard Kitty Hawk in January 1984. Kitty Hawk and her embarked Carrier Air Wing Five (CVW-5) are conducting combat missions in support of Operation Iraqi Freedom. AFP PHOTO/US NAVY/Todd FRANTOM (Photo by TODD FRANTOM / US NAVY / AFP)

ON AUGUST 19TH a senior Pentagon official confirmed what had previously only been hinted at: America is supplying Ukraine with High-speed Anti-Radiation Missiles (HARM). The missiles have been playing an important role in Ukraine’s spectacular offensive in Kharkiv province, as well as a separate attack in the south. Launched from an aircraft, HARM homes in on and destroys air-defence radar. The missiles represent a serious challenge to Russia. Even if not fired, the threat they pose can force radar operators to turn off their sets and lie low. Ukraine’s air force, as a result, may not quite fly with impunity, but it has greater freedom than before.

During the second world war batteries of large-calibre anti-aircraft guns were deployed to counter bombers, but these became obsolete once jet bombers could fly faster and higher. Missile technology responded, and by the late 1940s the first radar-guided surface-to-air missiles (SAM) appeared. These evolved rapidly and could soon reach stratospheric altitudes and bring down the fastest jet. Bomber crews then had to learn to fly under the radar, or find ways of countering it, such as jamming by electronic warfare.

More from The Economist explains

What is the “duck curve”?

An avian graph shows the challenges facing burgeoning solar power

How political “cohabitation” works in France

Upcoming parliamentary elections could lead to a new period of political friction


How America’s presidential debates are changing this year

Will the Trump-Biden showdowns be an institution’s last gasp, or a new start?


More from The Economist explains

What is the “duck curve”?

An avian graph shows the challenges facing burgeoning solar power

How political “cohabitation” works in France

Upcoming parliamentary elections could lead to a new period of political friction


How America’s presidential debates are changing this year

Will the Trump-Biden showdowns be an institution’s last gasp, or a new start?


What are MRP polls and can they predict election results accurately?

How a novel technique to predict Britain’s general election works

Ukraine has a navy that needs no sailors

It does a surprisingly good job of destroying Russian vessels

How powerful is the European Parliament?

Upcoming elections show its growing clout