-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Move all fetch() requests to background scripts #426
Open
maxxcrawford
wants to merge
6
commits into
main
Choose a base branch
from
mv3-spike-followup-fetch-migration
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
6 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
cb9e313
Move all fetch() requests to background scripts
maxxcrawford 75e8c3e
Correct typo
maxxcrawford 2ffa9f4
Update function name to be more readable
maxxcrawford 83d7727
From the review, refactored the main argument for the function to be …
maxxcrawford 74769b4
Fix rebase error - move relayNumbers request to new fetchRequestFromB…
maxxcrawford 25255d1
Remove CSRF header setter from fetchRequestFromBackground()
maxxcrawford File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't think you need a CSRF cookie if you're not making the request from the Relay website?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I dug into the git-blame on the cookie string origins. It was me. 🪞👨
200e2fb
I think the initial reasoning was to verify if a user had the server-storage pref enabled? I'll remove this and confirm this doesn't break anything.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Correction: I wasn't reading the full use-case of it. The CSRF token is passed in the Headers object for the follow API calls:
I did remove the CSRF header setter for the
fetchRequestFromBackground()
function.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
See 25255d1
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ah OK, I wasn't aware that there was already code in
background.js
that readcsrfCookieValue
from the extension storage. AFAIK that's not needed, but it's outside of the scope of this PR then anyway.