Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Correct presentation of content_security_policy in release notes 106 #21651

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 19, 2022

Conversation

rebloor
Copy link
Contributor

@rebloor rebloor commented Oct 19, 2022

Description

content_security_policy incorrectly presented as content-security-policy in release notes 106

@rebloor rebloor added the Content:WebExt WebExtensions docs label Oct 19, 2022
@rebloor rebloor requested a review from Rob--W October 19, 2022 08:08
@rebloor rebloor self-assigned this Oct 19, 2022
@rebloor rebloor requested a review from a team as a code owner October 19, 2022 08:08
@rebloor rebloor requested review from dletorey and removed request for a team October 19, 2022 08:08
@github-actions github-actions bot added Content:Other Any docs not covered by another "Content:" label and removed Content:WebExt WebExtensions docs labels Oct 19, 2022
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

Preview URLs

Copy link
Member

@Rob--W Rob--W left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for picking this up so quickly!

@Rob--W Rob--W merged commit e2d9f16 into mdn:main Oct 19, 2022
@rebloor rebloor added the Content:WebExt WebExtensions docs label Oct 19, 2022
@rebloor rebloor deleted the content_security_policy-rn-fix branch October 20, 2022 16:40
mfuji09 pushed a commit to mfuji09/MDN-content that referenced this pull request Oct 20, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Content:Other Any docs not covered by another "Content:" label Content:WebExt WebExtensions docs
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants