Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

cluster/gce: add webhook to replace PersistentVolumeLabel admission controller #121628

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 31, 2023

Conversation

andrewsykim
Copy link
Member

What type of PR is this?

/kind feature

What this PR does / why we need it:

Update scripts in cluster/ to replace the deprecated PersistentVolumeLabel admission controller with an admission webhook. The webhook is based on https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/cloud-pv-admission-labeler, which is a webhook server that uses the same logic by calling GetVolumeLabels.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Special notes for your reviewer:

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?

cluster/gce: add webhook to replace PersistentVolumeLabel admission controller

Additional documentation e.g., KEPs (Kubernetes Enhancement Proposals), usage docs, etc.:


@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. do-not-merge/needs-sig Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `sig/foo` label and requires one. needs-triage Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `triage/foo` label and requires one. labels Oct 31, 2023
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

This issue is currently awaiting triage.

If a SIG or subproject determines this is a relevant issue, they will accept it by applying the triage/accepted label and provide further guidance.

The triage/accepted label can be added by org members by writing /triage accepted in a comment.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the needs-priority Indicates a PR lacks a `priority/foo` label and requires one. label Oct 31, 2023
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added area/provider/gcp Issues or PRs related to gcp provider sig/cloud-provider Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Cloud Provider. and removed do-not-merge/needs-sig Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `sig/foo` label and requires one. labels Oct 31, 2023
@andrewsykim andrewsykim force-pushed the cloud-pvl-admission branch 2 times, most recently from 0978be0 to 988c2aa Compare October 31, 2023 16:30
@andrewsykim andrewsykim changed the title [WIP] cluster/gce: add webhook to replace PersistentVolumeLabel admission controller cluster/gce: add webhook to replace PersistentVolumeLabel admission controller Oct 31, 2023
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Oct 31, 2023
@andrewsykim
Copy link
Member Author

/assign @msau42 @cheftako @dims

@msau42
Copy link
Member

msau42 commented Oct 31, 2023

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Oct 31, 2023
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM label has been added.

Git tree hash: c0c8c293da3c112f9fe9d7f0cba1d9979cbfea03

@andrewsykim
Copy link
Member Author

/retest

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Oct 31, 2023
admissionReviewVersions: ["v1"]
sideEffects: None
timeoutSeconds: 5
failurePolicy: Fail
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is this worth failing on? This means that if there is a problem with the webhook, no PVs can be created. Slightly worries about bootstrapping type issues (webhook needs a PV, PV needs the webhook). More just a priority. This was intended for an edge case. Do we want to block the normal case over concerns about the edge case?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Fail seems appropriate here because we need strong guarentees that the topology labels are applied (at least in comparison to the current PersistentVolumeLabel admission controller). I will follow up and change this to Ignore if it causes too many issues in tests

"image": "gcr.io/k8s-staging-cloud-pv-labeler/cloud-pv-admission-labeler:v0.3.0",
"resources": {
"requests": {
"cpu": "10m"
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This seems low

@@ -1357,6 +1361,9 @@ KUBE_POD_LOG_READERS_GROUP: 2007
KONNECTIVITY_SERVER_RUNASUSER: 2008
KONNECTIVITY_SERVER_RUNASGROUP: 2008
KONNECTIVITY_SERVER_SOCKET_WRITER_GROUP: 2008
CLOUD_CONTROLLER_MANAGER_RUNASUSER: 2009
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@cheftako
Copy link
Member

/lgtm
/approve

A little concerned about the failure policy but we can always fix that later.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Oct 31, 2023
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM label has been added.

Git tree hash: 098b979eb45fdce0155dbd62ae030287cb86ae5e

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: andrewsykim, cheftako

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Oct 31, 2023
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 3eba6fc into kubernetes:master Oct 31, 2023
14 checks passed
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added this to the v1.29 milestone Oct 31, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. area/provider/gcp Issues or PRs related to gcp provider cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. needs-priority Indicates a PR lacks a `priority/foo` label and requires one. needs-triage Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `triage/foo` label and requires one. release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. sig/cloud-provider Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Cloud Provider. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants