-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 38.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Promote CSINodeExpandSecret to GA #121303
Conversation
cc @xing-yang |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There are a few place where we have checks to determine if this feature gate is enabled or not and we need to remove those as the feature gate is locked to default. Here are a few examples:
kubernetes/pkg/volume/csi/expander.go
Line 86 in d22e315
if utilfeature.DefaultFeatureGate.Enabled(features.CSINodeExpandSecret) { |
if !utilfeature.DefaultFeatureGate.Enabled(features.CSINodeExpandSecret) && !hasNodeExpansionSecrets(oldPVSpec) { |
kubernetes/pkg/volume/csi/expander_test.go
Line 120 in 64799e0
defer featuregatetesting.SetFeatureGateDuringTest(t, utilfeature.DefaultFeatureGate, features.CSINodeExpandSecret, tc.enableCSINodeExpandSecret)() |
defer featuregatetesting.SetFeatureGateDuringTest(t, utilfeature.DefaultFeatureGate, features.CSINodeExpandSecret, tc.csiExpansionEnabled)() |
/sig storage |
Comments for the API needs to be updated from "beta" to "GA": |
0c3c7aa
to
eb6b354
Compare
/lgtm |
/remove-kind failing-test |
/remove-kind deprecation |
/remove-kind flake |
@wojtek-t can you please review/approve it from |
Trying to get #121210 merged |
/approve |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: humblec, msau42, xing-yang The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
@humblec please rebase! |
c357ef6
to
40bfe7d
Compare
This feature is in Beta since 1.27 and this has been promoted to GA in this release. KEP: kubernetes/enhancements#4239 Signed-off-by: Humble Chirammal <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: zhucan <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Humble Chirammal <[email protected]>
40bfe7d
to
3890546
Compare
@xing-yang @msau42 rebased to master to resolve the conflict.. can you please bring back lgtm ? |
/lgtm |
LGTM label has been added. Git tree hash: fec0ae6665df0a7dcc5aba936318c41520a70686
|
/retest |
Thanks everyone 🎉 🎉 |
This feature is in Beta since 1.27 and this has been promoted to GA in this release.
KEP: kubernetes/enhancements#4239
Reference # kubernetes/enhancements#4239
What type of PR is this?
/kind feature
-->
What this PR does / why we need it:
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #
Special notes for your reviewer:
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?
Additional documentation e.g., KEPs (Kubernetes Enhancement Proposals), usage docs, etc.: