-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 29
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Specify top-level navigation with new _unfencedTop keyword #20
Labels
specification
Additions to specifications
Comments
aarongable
pushed a commit
to chromium/chromium
that referenced
this issue
Mar 31, 2022
This CL disables _unfencedTop in MPArch and in modes other than opaque-ads. This unblocks MPArch OT, because _unfencedTop will work as a normal target name and open an auxiliary browsing context. (So the same ad code will work in both ShadowDOM and MPArch, albeit with slightly different (but both acceptable) behaviors.) The correct implementation of _unfencedTop in MPArch will come later, hopefully before OT. Fenced frames spec issue: WICG/fenced-frame#20 Bug: 1123606 Change-Id: I1c2414b3bac73f5ed94a6b3c3b0668229c70307d Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/3551022 Reviewed-by: Dominic Farolino <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Jeremy Roman <[email protected]> Commit-Queue: Garrett Tanzer <[email protected]> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#987407}
mjfroman
pushed a commit
to mjfroman/moz-libwebrtc-third-party
that referenced
this issue
Oct 14, 2022
This CL disables _unfencedTop in MPArch and in modes other than opaque-ads. This unblocks MPArch OT, because _unfencedTop will work as a normal target name and open an auxiliary browsing context. (So the same ad code will work in both ShadowDOM and MPArch, albeit with slightly different (but both acceptable) behaviors.) The correct implementation of _unfencedTop in MPArch will come later, hopefully before OT. Fenced frames spec issue: WICG/fenced-frame#20 Bug: 1123606 Change-Id: I1c2414b3bac73f5ed94a6b3c3b0668229c70307d Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/3551022 Reviewed-by: Dominic Farolino <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Jeremy Roman <[email protected]> Commit-Queue: Garrett Tanzer <[email protected]> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#987407} NOKEYCHECK=True GitOrigin-RevId: dba5954bdbed4bd471a2a1df1ed4fea7a8b442d7
domfarolino
changed the title
[Spec] Top-level navigation with _unfencedTop
Specify top-level navigation with new _unfencedTop keyword
Jun 3, 2023
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Specify top-level navigation inside opaque-ads fenced frames using the new reserved target "_unfencedTop", which acts like "_top" but ignores fence boundaries.
Decision point: should _unfencedTop act like a normal target name outside opaque-ads fenced frames, or be prohibited?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: