I keep seeing takes about them using AI to blend features in Furiosa, and have been shocked to find out that they're using the term "AI" to describe what is basically just the current iteration of a technology that's existed at least as long as I'm alive. Zero jobs are stolen, zero creativity lost, zero labor issues at play, just VFX professionals paid to apply a digital effect. Five years ago, that same technology would've been referred to as "CGI" or "VFX."
Like, I've seen people apply the term "AI" to software that's existed long before any of the current AI or Machine Learning booms, like tools that can remove the background to make a transparent image, tools that can detect red-eye in photographs and correct it, etc.
I fully get, and agree with, the opposition to using generative AI for things like art or writing or creation of assets! My confusion is in seeing tech companies now try to slap the term "AI" on literally every automated feature they have. Calculator? Nope. Math AI. Translation algorithm? Nope. AI translation. Ray tracing? Nope. AI that renders light.
I swear to god tech companies want developers to just put "powered by AI" under literally any digital feature now, even features they've had for years, to make them seem "cutting edge," and my tinfoil hat theory is that they're trying to get the term "AI" to replace the term "software" to make the people who are opposed to the labor-rights-violating, job-stealing, "boss threatens to replace you with it if your wages and benefits prove too expensive" AI seem like backwards luddites who hate technology