Skip to content

DOC: Add missing link to example in plot_digits_agglomeration.py #31681

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

Nachi28
Copy link

@Nachi28 Nachi28 commented Jun 30, 2025

Reference Issues/PRs

Fixes #30979
Supersedes and continues work from PR #30979 by @AshleyNDoerfler

What does this implement/fix? Explain your changes.

This PR adds the missing reference link to the example plot_digits_agglomeration.py in the clustering user guide (clustering.rst), specifically under the Feature Agglomeration section.

Additionally:

  • Fixed formatting issues by adding a missing period.
  • Added the required empty line to resolve the linting issue flagged in the original PR.

Any other comments?

Please let me know if there are any additional changes or improvements you'd like me to make.

Copy link

✔️ Linting Passed

All linting checks passed. Your pull request is in excellent shape! ☀️

Generated for commit: 005025a. Link to the linter CI: here

Copy link
Member

@virchan virchan left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for the PR and continuing the work from #30979, @Nachi28! I have a few comments.

  1. In the "Reference Issues/PRs" section of the PR description, could you please replace "Fixes #30979" with "Towards #26927"? This helps us better track progress on the meta issue.
  2. I also think it would be helpful to include the example link in the docstring for FeatureAgglomeration.

Cc @StefanieSenger in advance.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants