Skip to content

DOC Removed examples/semi_supervised/plot_semi_supervised_versus_svm_iris.py #31625

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

elhambbi
Copy link
Contributor

Reference Issues/PRs

Removed the example examples/semi_supervised/plot_semi_supervised_versus_svm_iris.py as discussed in #31499

What does this implement/fix? Explain your changes.

The performance of semi-supervised methods, SelfTraining and LabelSpreading, is already evaluated in this example, which is improved in #31104. There is no need for more examples to show this.

Any other comments?

Copy link

✔️ Linting Passed

All linting checks passed. Your pull request is in excellent shape! ☀️

Generated for commit: c7542e7. Link to the linter CI: here

@elhambbi
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hi @StefanieSenger. I created this PR to remove the example mentioned in #31499 (this example is not referenced anywhere).
I'll also check if we need more improvement for the other example in #31104 because of this removal. Thanks.

Copy link
Contributor

@StefanieSenger StefanieSenger left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hi @elhambbi, thanks for this PR to remove the example as we had discussed with @adrinjalali.

There are a few tasks that are left to be done:

  1. Remove the references to this example in doc/modules/semi_supervised.rst (in currently li. 66 and in li. 139)
  2. We need to add a redirection in doc/conf.py to the re-worked example in case the removed example had been linked externally. You can use #30906 as a guide of how to do that.
  3. Could you shortly sum up, what are the interesting things from the deleted example, that you would like to integrate into your re-worked example in #31104? Are there any at all?

No worries about the failing CI checks, btw, they come from main and have nothing to do with your PR.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants