Skip to content

[MRG] DOC: add Visualization API ROC example link to model_evaluation #31591

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

EvMossan
Copy link

Reference Issues/PRs

Towards #30621

What does this implement/fix?

Adds a link to the end-to-end example plot_roc_curve_visualization_api.py
in the ROC section of the User Guide.

Any other comments?

None.

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jun 19, 2025

✔️ Linting Passed

All linting checks passed. Your pull request is in excellent shape! ☀️

Generated for commit: ec53ba7. Link to the linter CI: here

@EvMossan EvMossan changed the title DOC: add Visualization API ROC example link to model_evaluation [MRG] DOC: add Visualization API ROC example link to model_evaluation Jun 22, 2025
@StefanieSenger StefanieSenger added good first PR to review Simple atomic PR to review and removed good first PR to review Simple atomic PR to review labels Jun 25, 2025
@StefanieSenger
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @evgmosme, thanks for your PR.

I need to admit that I am really unsure if we want to add any more link to this very basic example or if it is better to entirely remove it. We use the from_estimator syntax in many other examples and link them in proper places.

Let's wait for other opinions.

@StefanieSenger StefanieSenger added the Waiting for Second Reviewer First reviewer is done, need a second one! label Jun 29, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Documentation Waiting for Second Reviewer First reviewer is done, need a second one!
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants