Skip to content

Add fancy new charts #95

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Jun 24, 2025
Merged

Conversation

StanFromIreland
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@StanFromIreland StanFromIreland requested a review from m-aciek June 21, 2025 14:20
@StanFromIreland
Copy link
Member Author

@m-aciek WDYT?

Copy link
Collaborator

@m-aciek m-aciek left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks! It looks like on the chart the progress is like 14% now? Does it exclude changelog? If so, maybe we could comment on it below the chart. Also it would be nice to publish/link to the generating script to allow for updates in future and/or automation.

@StanFromIreland
Copy link
Member Author

StanFromIreland commented Jun 22, 2025

It looks like on the chart the progress is like 14% now?

I agree, I will look into it. My data, generated using potodo, shows 13.49 as the highest entry. I assume it is therefore a side effect of the rendering. Though the data is also higher than that of the Transifex statistics, which is odd.

Also it would be nice to publish/link to the generating script to allow for updates in future and/or automation.

I will add a comment to a gh gist with it to the README once I sort out your other comments.

@StanFromIreland
Copy link
Member Author

StanFromIreland commented Jun 22, 2025

Images updated. Note that the line count difference between the files is because Inkscape seems to compress them, whereas the raw Matplotlib svg is spread out. I doubt it makes a difference.

It does still look at bit like it's at 14%, but from matplotlibs interactive viewer it confirms it's ~13.5 (which is still a minor mystery, but the chart in general was not designed with accuracy in mind).

I simplified the messages, though I kept the initial date.

If this is good to go I'll upload the scripts as gists (and link them) and merge.

@StanFromIreland StanFromIreland requested a review from m-aciek June 22, 2025 21:20
Copy link
Collaborator

@m-aciek m-aciek left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

To build gettext with the changelog, the blurb package should be installed in the environment.

@StanFromIreland
Copy link
Member Author

the blurb package should be installed in the environment.

I used my system environment, which does have blurb, maybe it is because I used make gettext rather than the builder directly.

@StanFromIreland StanFromIreland merged commit 48f75c5 into python:3.14 Jun 24, 2025
@StanFromIreland StanFromIreland deleted the trans-prog branch June 24, 2025 08:34
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants