-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 15
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Reliant specs and their layering #43
Labels
spec
Related to specification/standardization
Comments
Note this has been partially addressed by #51, but leaving the issue open until the monkey patches are moved to the Shared Storage/Protected Audience specs |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Reading through the spec, this seems like infrastructure that a couple of other specs are currently relying on, but one that could be potentially useful for future cases. (e.g. one can imagine a "cross-origin data worklet" that has access to cross-origin data and uses it to generate performance-related histograms in a secure way that doesn't leak any user-specific data)
Given that, I think it'd make sense to make this spec more agnostic to specs that rely on it. In order to do that, I think it'd make sense to move all the SharedStrorage/FLEDGE specific bits to their respective specifications, and only define the infrastructure (that can serve both cases) here.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: