Skip to content

BF: groupwise_registration type checking #442

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Conversation

abrys
Copy link

@abrys abrys commented Mar 6, 2018

Incorrect type checking in case of numpy arrays. As np.array is just the function to create the array, the type would need to be np.ndarray.
If used with a numpy array it results in "typeError: isinstance() arg 2 must be a type or tuple of types"
Was used correctly in other cases

Incorrect type checking in case of numpy arrays. As np.array is just the function to create the array, the type would need to be np.ndarray.
If used with a numpy array it results in "typeError: isinstance() arg 2 must be a type or tuple of types"
Was used correctly in other cases
@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented Mar 6, 2018

Codecov Report

Merging #442 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is 0%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #442   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   83.24%   83.24%           
=======================================
  Files         301      301           
  Lines       28241    28241           
  Branches     3286     3286           
=======================================
  Hits        23509    23509           
  Misses       3728     3728           
  Partials     1004     1004
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
.../algorithms/registration/groupwise_registration.py 89.67% <0%> (ø) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 628ad8d...fdf2410. Read the comment docs.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants