-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 40.9k
e2e: retry getting status on restart policy tests #132468
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: haircommander The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
as the containers in a pod restart, the pod may enter exponential backoff, which delays the pod being ready. In this case for this pod, it's expected, but we shouldn't fail to continue the test before the container has been given the chance to start again Signed-off-by: Peter Hunt <[email protected]>
c9ae335
to
fd8bf1c
Compare
I gathered this from this sequence:
the unix socket errors are weird and could take some investigation but I think the point stands that we expect this pod to become ready soon |
/retest /assign @SergeyKanzhelev @mrunalp |
LGTM label has been added. Git tree hash: bc489081662fb0c07d58ee0762b827ac3a271798
|
What type of PR is this?
/kind failing-test
What this PR does / why we need it:
as the containers in a pod restart, the pod may enter exponential backoff, which delays the pod being ready. In this case for this pod, it's expected, but we shouldn't fail to continue the test before the container has been given the chance to start again
Which issue(s) this PR is related to:
Fixes #132425
Special notes for your reviewer:
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?
Additional documentation e.g., KEPs (Kubernetes Enhancement Proposals), usage docs, etc.: