-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 40.9k
Enforce structural rules in CRD OpenAPIv3 schema validation #131836
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Add strict checks so that a schema containing `items`, `properties`, or `additionalProperties` is only accepted when the parent `type` is `array` or `object` as required: * `items` allowed only when `type: array` * `properties` allowed only when `type: object` * `additionalProperties` allowed only when `type: object` These rules prevent non-structural schemas from being stored in Custom Resource Definitions and avoid runtime panics or inconsistent behavior.
Hi @tomoish. Thanks for your PR. I'm waiting for a kubernetes member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the I understand the commands that are listed here. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: tomoish The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
/sig api-machinery |
This PR may require API review. If so, when the changes are ready, complete the pre-review checklist and request an API review. Status of requested reviews is tracked in the API Review project. |
While I would love to clean this up. I'm hesitant because it could break in-use CRDs. Having both "items" and "properties" is allowed today and so it's possible to have CRDs that work fine. While the schemas for such a CRD are clearly a mess, and as much as I'd like to make that better, I don't really want to cause production issues by making such CRDs invalid. I support modifying validation to return warnings in these cases. @JoelSpeed @yongruilin - Could we also lint CRDs for this? |
This is definitely something we should be linting, making sure that all markers are applied to the correct object vs array vs other (int/string etc) I'll create an issue |
@liggitt suggested we also check what we publish to This sounds like a great idea to me. |
PR needs rebase. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
What type of PR is this?
/kind bug
What this PR does / why we need it:
Tightens CRD OpenAPI v3 validation. A schema that sets
items
,properties
, oradditionalProperties
is now accepted only whenthe owning schema declares the matching
type
:items
: parenttype
must be"array"
properties
: parenttype
must be"object"
additionalProperties
: parenttype
must be"object"
These checks keep CRDs structurally valid, prevent runtime panics, and
align the apiserver with OpenAPI v3 constraints.
Key changes
ValidateCustomResourceDefinitionOpenAPISchema
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #126273
Special notes for your reviewer:
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?
Additional documentation e.g., KEPs (Kubernetes Enhancement Proposals), usage docs, etc.: