Skip to content

E2E Node Tests: Remove failing test from reverted PR #130992

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

dshebib
Copy link
Contributor

@dshebib dshebib commented Mar 21, 2025

What type of PR is this?

/kind cleanup
/sig node
/sig testing

What this PR does / why we need it:

This PR resubmits changes from PR #128037, which was reverted in #130965 due to consistent failures in the master test grid.

The test which was failing in those pipelines has been removed entirely. It tested changing the image of a running regular container by updating the container spec to an invalid image, but the expected outcome of that operation is not clear and was causing failures.

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?

NONE

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. kind/cleanup Categorizes issue or PR as related to cleaning up code, process, or technical debt. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. sig/node Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Node. sig/testing Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Testing. labels Mar 21, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. needs-triage Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `triage/foo` label and requires one. labels Mar 21, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

This issue is currently awaiting triage.

If a SIG or subproject determines this is a relevant issue, they will accept it by applying the triage/accepted label and provide further guidance.

The triage/accepted label can be added by org members by writing /triage accepted in a comment.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @dshebib. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added needs-priority Indicates a PR lacks a `priority/foo` label and requires one. needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. labels Mar 21, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: dshebib
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign derekwaynecarr for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@dshebib
Copy link
Contributor Author

dshebib commented Mar 21, 2025

/cc @SergeyKanzhelev

@SergeyKanzhelev
Copy link
Member

/assign

@SergeyKanzhelev
Copy link
Member

SergeyKanzhelev commented Mar 26, 2025

/assign @vivzbansal

@SergeyKanzhelev SergeyKanzhelev moved this from Triage to PRs - Needs Reviewer in SIG Node CI/Test Board Mar 26, 2025
@vivzbansal
Copy link
Contributor

@dshebib Were you able to figure out the reason why the tests were failing earlier?

@bart0sh bart0sh moved this from Triage to Needs Reviewer in SIG Node: code and documentation PRs Apr 3, 2025
@k8s-triage-robot
Copy link

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all PRs.

This bot triages PRs according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the PR is closed

You can:

  • Mark this PR as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale
  • Close this PR with /close
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Jun 26, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area/test cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. kind/cleanup Categorizes issue or PR as related to cleaning up code, process, or technical debt. lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. needs-priority Indicates a PR lacks a `priority/foo` label and requires one. needs-triage Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `triage/foo` label and requires one. release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. sig/node Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Node. sig/testing Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Testing. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
Status: PRs - Needs Reviewer
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants