-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 40.9k
Remove huge page form allocatable memory #119173
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Remove huge page form allocatable memory #119173
Conversation
Hi @lance5890. Thanks for your PR. I'm waiting for a kubernetes member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the I understand the commands that are listed here. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/ok-to-test |
df53ddf
to
76e3152
Compare
f53c2bf
to
c7823e8
Compare
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all PRs. This bot triages PRs according to the following rules:
You can:
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community. /lifecycle rotten |
/remove-lifecycle rotten |
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all PRs. This bot triages PRs according to the following rules:
You can:
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community. /lifecycle stale |
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all PRs. This bot triages PRs according to the following rules:
You can:
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community. /lifecycle rotten |
/remove-lifecycle rotten |
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all PRs. This bot triages PRs according to the following rules:
You can:
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community. /lifecycle stale |
/remove-lifecycle stale @lance5890 e2e eviction test is still required. It should demonstrate how this change improves node-pressure eviction. Please, rebase, thanks! |
8e8bf3b
to
559964c
Compare
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: lance5890 The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
Signed-off-by: lan.tian <[email protected]>
559964c
to
6b52be3
Compare
/cc @ndixita |
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all PRs. This bot triages PRs according to the following rules:
You can:
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community. /lifecycle stale |
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all PRs. This bot triages PRs according to the following rules:
You can:
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community. /lifecycle rotten |
What type of PR is this?
/kind bug
What this PR does / why we need it:
On linux, If a node contains hugePages, the memory.limit_in_bytes of kubepods cgroup contains the capacity of hugePages, which causes problems with the oomkiller.
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes # #84426
Special notes for your reviewer:
related PR
#99943
#86758
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?
Additional documentation e.g., KEPs (Kubernetes Enhancement Proposals), usage docs, etc.: