Skip to content

Improve validation for media selector #147768

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 30, 2025
Merged

Conversation

balloob
Copy link
Member

@balloob balloob commented Jun 29, 2025

Breaking change

Proposed change

Improve the validation of the media selector.

Type of change

  • Dependency upgrade
  • Bugfix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New integration (thank you!)
  • New feature (which adds functionality to an existing integration)
  • Deprecation (breaking change to happen in the future)
  • Breaking change (fix/feature causing existing functionality to break)
  • Code quality improvements to existing code or addition of tests

Additional information

  • This PR fixes or closes issue: fixes #
  • This PR is related to issue:
  • Link to documentation pull request:
  • Link to developer documentation pull request:
  • Link to frontend pull request:

Checklist

  • The code change is tested and works locally.
  • Local tests pass. Your PR cannot be merged unless tests pass
  • There is no commented out code in this PR.
  • I have followed the development checklist
  • I have followed the perfect PR recommendations
  • The code has been formatted using Ruff (ruff format homeassistant tests)
  • Tests have been added to verify that the new code works.

If user exposed functionality or configuration variables are added/changed:

If the code communicates with devices, web services, or third-party tools:

  • The manifest file has all fields filled out correctly.
    Updated and included derived files by running: python3 -m script.hassfest.
  • New or updated dependencies have been added to requirements_all.txt.
    Updated by running python3 -m script.gen_requirements_all.
  • For the updated dependencies - a link to the changelog, or at minimum a diff between library versions is added to the PR description.

To help with the load of incoming pull requests:

@Copilot Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings June 29, 2025 11:29
@balloob balloob requested a review from a team as a code owner June 29, 2025 11:29
@home-assistant home-assistant bot added cla-signed core new-feature small-pr PRs with less than 30 lines. labels Jun 29, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@Copilot Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull Request Overview

This PR enhances the media selector’s validation by making the entity_id field conditionally required based on whether an accept option is configured. It also updates the method’s return type annotation.

  • Adjust return type hint from dict[str, float] to dict[str, str]
  • Introduce a mutable copy of the selector’s schema to add or remove the entity_id requirement
  • Call the original DATA_SCHEMA for validation

@frenck frenck merged commit be6b624 into dev Jun 30, 2025
48 checks passed
@frenck frenck deleted the media-selector-improve-validator branch June 30, 2025 18:26
# If accept is not set, the entity_id field is required
schema[vol.Required("entity_id")] = cv.entity_id_or_uuid

media: dict[str, str] = self.DATA_SCHEMA(data)
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Where is the schema variable used?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ah snap forgot to update that. let me fix.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@balloob balloob mentioned this pull request Jul 1, 2025
19 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants