Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We鈥檒l occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: AccessEntry API representation parsing #1682

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Oct 19, 2023

Conversation

jonathan-ostrander
Copy link
Contributor

Overriding the AccessEntry#_properties with a deep copy of the API resource overwrites the role property set in AccessEntry.__init__ which isn't present in the resource if the role is set to None. This causes AccessEntrys generated from API representations to no longer evaluate to equal with equivalent AccessEntry resources instantiated through AccessEntry.__init__. The added unit test fails without the change and passes with the change.

Thank you for opening a Pull Request! Before submitting your PR, there are a few things you can do to make sure it goes smoothly:

  • Make sure to open an issue as a bug/issue before writing your code! That way we can discuss the change, evaluate designs, and agree on the general idea
  • Ensure the tests and linter pass
  • Code coverage does not decrease (if any source code was changed)
  • Appropriate docs were updated (if necessary)

Fixes #1681 馃

Overriding the `AccessEntry#_properties` with a deep copy of the API resource overwrites the `role` property set in `AccessEntry.__init__` which isn't present in the resource if the `role` is set to `None`. This causes `AccessEntry`s generated from API representations to no longer evaluate to equal with equivalent `AccessEntry` resources instantiated through `AccessEntry.__init__`. The added unit test fails without the change and passes with the change.
@product-auto-label product-auto-label bot added size: s Pull request size is small. api: bigquery Issues related to the googleapis/python-bigquery API. labels Oct 13, 2023
@Linchin Linchin added the kokoro:force-run Add this label to force Kokoro to re-run the tests. label Oct 17, 2023
@yoshi-kokoro yoshi-kokoro removed the kokoro:force-run Add this label to force Kokoro to re-run the tests. label Oct 17, 2023
@Linchin Linchin requested review from Linchin and chalmerlowe and removed request for PhongChuong October 17, 2023 16:47
@Linchin
Copy link
Contributor

Linchin commented Oct 18, 2023

Hi @jonathan-ostrander, thank you so much for your contribution! The PR looks good, but it seems the lint test failed. As seen in the kokoro results:
image

Please see the instructions in the contribution doc for more info on coding style. If you need any help, please let us know! :)

Copy link
Contributor

@Linchin Linchin left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

please fix linting error

@jonathan-ostrander
Copy link
Contributor Author

@Linchin should be fixed in 15153e6 although I couldn't get nox working locally so I just ran black.

@dandhlee dandhlee added the kokoro:run Add this label to force Kokoro to re-run the tests. label Oct 18, 2023
@yoshi-kokoro yoshi-kokoro removed the kokoro:run Add this label to force Kokoro to re-run the tests. label Oct 18, 2023
@Linchin Linchin added the kokoro:force-run Add this label to force Kokoro to re-run the tests. label Oct 19, 2023
@yoshi-kokoro yoshi-kokoro removed the kokoro:force-run Add this label to force Kokoro to re-run the tests. label Oct 19, 2023
@Linchin Linchin added the kokoro:force-run Add this label to force Kokoro to re-run the tests. label Oct 19, 2023
@yoshi-kokoro yoshi-kokoro removed the kokoro:force-run Add this label to force Kokoro to re-run the tests. label Oct 19, 2023
@Linchin Linchin enabled auto-merge (squash) October 19, 2023 19:59
@Linchin Linchin merged commit a40d7ae into googleapis:main Oct 19, 2023
16 of 17 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
api: bigquery Issues related to the googleapis/python-bigquery API. size: s Pull request size is small.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

AccessEntry incorrectly parsed from API Representation
4 participants