If we were to mention something that names itself "git-something" without our approval, the first thing we should say about it is that they are in violation of Git trademark policy, isn't it?

@gitster, "git-tower" is in the web site's name. It looks like the product is actually called "Tower".

Also I am open to discussing potential trademark issues, but I don't think Git Rev News issues are the right place for that. We have other channels for that.

So I am going to merge this.

Thanks @brunofbrito!

@jnareb feel free to edit the Light Reading part of this.