Skip to content

fix: make DocList compatible with BaseDocWithoutId #1805

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 26, 2023
Merged

Conversation

samsja
Copy link
Member

@samsja samsja commented Sep 26, 2023

Context

DocList[BaseDocWithoutId] was failing. This pr fixed it

@samsja samsja marked this pull request as ready for review September 26, 2023 10:50
@github-actions
Copy link

📝 Docs are deployed on https://ft-fix-doc-list-wo-id--jina-docs.netlify.app 🎉

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 26, 2023

Codecov Report

All modified lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (2a1cc9e) 84.81% compared to head (e41fb55) 84.80%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1805      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   84.81%   84.80%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         135      135              
  Lines        8905     8906       +1     
==========================================
  Hits         7553     7553              
- Misses       1352     1353       +1     
Flag Coverage Δ
docarray 84.80% <100.00%> (-0.01%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files Coverage Δ
docarray/array/any_array.py 88.88% <100.00%> (ø)
docarray/array/doc_list/doc_list.py 87.09% <100.00%> (+0.10%) ⬆️

... and 1 file with indirect coverage changes

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@JoanFM JoanFM merged commit 2937e25 into main Sep 26, 2023
@JoanFM JoanFM deleted the fix-doc-list-wo-id branch September 26, 2023 11:20
@JoanFM JoanFM mentioned this pull request Oct 2, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants