Skip to content

chore: remove pydantic ref from issue template #1767

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 30, 2023
Merged

chore: remove pydantic ref from issue template #1767

merged 1 commit into from
Aug 30, 2023

Conversation

samsja
Copy link
Member

@samsja samsja commented Aug 29, 2023

Context

fix issue template

@github-actions
Copy link

📝 Docs are deployed on https://ft-chore-issue--jina-docs.netlify.app 🎉

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 29, 2023

Codecov Report

Patch coverage has no change and project coverage change: -1.41% ⚠️

Comparison is base (cd4854c) 85.00% compared to head (a6bdd36) 83.60%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1767      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   85.00%   83.60%   -1.41%     
==========================================
  Files         134      134              
  Lines        8845     8845              
==========================================
- Hits         7519     7395     -124     
- Misses       1326     1450     +124     
Flag Coverage Δ
docarray 83.60% <ø> (-1.41%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

see 12 files with indirect coverage changes

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@samsja samsja marked this pull request as ready for review August 30, 2023 07:10
@samsja samsja merged commit cc2339d into main Aug 30, 2023
@samsja samsja deleted the chore-issue branch August 30, 2023 07:10
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants