feat: HasX attributes #34
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Nathaniel Starkman <[email protected]>
Support unary minus operator. Signed-off-by: Nathaniel Starkman <[email protected]>
Support addition operator for array classes. Signed-off-by: Nathaniel Starkman <[email protected]>
Support subtraction operator for array classes Signed-off-by: Nathaniel Starkman <[email protected]>
Support multiplication operator for array classes Signed-off-by: Nathaniel Starkman <[email protected]>
Support true division operator for array classes
Support floor division operator for array classes
Support modulo operator for array classes
Support power operator for array classes
Support in-place addition operator for array classes
Support in-place subtraction operator for array classes
Support in-place multiplication operator for array classes
Support in-place true division operator for array classes
Support in-place floor division operator for array classes
Support in-place power operator for array classes
Support in-place modulo operator for array classes
Support right addition operator for array classes Signed-off-by: Nathaniel Starkman <[email protected]>
Support right subtraction operator for array classes
Support right multiplication operator for array classes
Support right division operator for array classes Signed-off-by: Nathaniel Starkman <[email protected]>
Support right floor division operator for array classes
Support right power operator for array classes
Support right modulo operator for array classes Signed-off-by: Nathaniel Starkman <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Nathaniel Starkman <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Nathaniel Starkman <[email protected]>
|
@jorenham @NeilGirdhar @lucascolley this doesn't resolve the current discussion re a |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I like the Has* protocols. Optype will cover the CanArray* ones I think. There might be some that can't be expressed because Self can't be passed as generic type argument, but I suppose we can deal with it when needed.
One nit is that ... are not needed when there's a docstring, which already counts as an expression or statement or something.
What do we do about docstrings?
Yes, my pylint is complaining. But IMO empty methods should have |
Hmm good question. Maybe a numpy-esque |
Yea I guess there's something to be said for that. It just looks a bit weird to me to see a |
Requires #32. I'll rebase when that's in.