Skip to content

Fix failing static check for Oracle provider #52436

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 29, 2025

Conversation

kaxil
Copy link
Member

@kaxil kaxil commented Jun 29, 2025

The recently added pre-commits fails because of it


^ Add meaningful description above
Read the Pull Request Guidelines for more information.
In case of fundamental code changes, an Airflow Improvement Proposal (AIP) is needed.
In case of a new dependency, check compliance with the ASF 3rd Party License Policy.
In case of backwards incompatible changes please leave a note in a newsfragment file, named {pr_number}.significant.rst or {issue_number}.significant.rst, in airflow-core/newsfragments.

The recently added pre-commits fails because of it
@sjyangkevin
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks @kaxil , I just discovered this and I found a discussion on slack, and plan to submit a fix. Sorry for the mistake

@amoghrajesh amoghrajesh merged commit 56c4701 into apache:main Jun 29, 2025
70 checks passed
@amoghrajesh amoghrajesh deleted the fix-static-check branch June 29, 2025 05:36
@kaxil
Copy link
Member Author

kaxil commented Jun 29, 2025

Thanks @kaxil , I just discovered this and I found a discussion on slack, and plan to submit a fix. Sorry for the mistake

All good, we have all been there :)

@potiuk
Copy link
Member

potiuk commented Jun 29, 2025

Thanks @kaxil , I just discovered this and I found a discussion on slack, and plan to submit a fix. Sorry for the mistake

All good, we have all been there :)

And more than once :)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants