Skip to content

Fix spelling in edge provider #52169

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 24, 2025
Merged

Conversation

bdsoha
Copy link
Contributor

@bdsoha bdsoha commented Jun 24, 2025


^ Add meaningful description above
Read the Pull Request Guidelines for more information.
In case of fundamental code changes, an Airflow Improvement Proposal (AIP) is needed.
In case of a new dependency, check compliance with the ASF 3rd Party License Policy.
In case of backwards incompatible changes please leave a note in a newsfragment file, named {pr_number}.significant.rst or {issue_number}.significant.rst, in airflow-core/newsfragments.

@boring-cyborg boring-cyborg bot added area:providers provider:edge Edge Executor / Worker (AIP-69) labels Jun 24, 2025
@bdsoha bdsoha marked this pull request as ready for review June 24, 2025 19:08
@bdsoha bdsoha requested a review from jscheffl as a code owner June 24, 2025 19:08
@jscheffl jscheffl force-pushed the feature/edge-spellcheck branch from 87c70de to 75216cf Compare June 24, 2025 20:10
Copy link
Contributor

@jscheffl jscheffl left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for the typo fixes!

@jscheffl
Copy link
Contributor

Static checks failure is un-realted to PR. Merging

@jscheffl jscheffl merged commit 24981df into apache:main Jun 24, 2025
66 of 67 checks passed
@bdsoha bdsoha deleted the feature/edge-spellcheck branch June 25, 2025 05:21
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area:providers provider:edge Edge Executor / Worker (AIP-69)
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants