Skip to content

[Skia] Variation selector should take precedence over font-variant-emoji #47294

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

carlosgcampos
Copy link
Contributor

@carlosgcampos carlosgcampos commented Jun 27, 2025

d605e21

[Skia] Variation selector should take precedence over font-variant-emoji
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=295097

Reviewed by NOBODY (OOPS!).

According to the spec: "Even when font-variant-emoji is used, the
presence of Variation Selector 15 (U+FE0E) or Variation Selector 16
(U+FE0F) in the contents of an element override the rendering specified
in font-variant-emoji."

d605e21

Misc iOS, visionOS, tvOS & watchOS macOS Linux Windows
✅ 🧪 style ✅ 🛠 ios ✅ 🛠 mac ✅ 🛠 wpe ✅ 🛠 win
✅ 🧪 bindings ✅ 🛠 ios-sim ✅ 🛠 mac-AS-debug ❌ 🧪 wpe-wk2 ⏳ 🧪 win-tests
✅ 🧪 webkitperl ✅ 🧪 ios-wk2 ✅ 🧪 api-mac ✅ 🧪 api-wpe
✅ 🧪 ios-wk2-wpt ✅ 🧪 mac-wk1 ✅ 🛠 wpe-cairo
✅ 🧪 api-ios ✅ 🧪 mac-wk2 ✅ 🛠 gtk
✅ 🛠 vision ✅ 🧪 mac-AS-debug-wk2 ❌ 🧪 gtk-wk2
✅ 🛠 vision-sim ✅ 🧪 mac-wk2-stress ✅ 🧪 api-gtk
✅ 🧪 vision-wk2 ✅ 🧪 mac-intel-wk2 ✅ 🛠 playstation
✅ 🛠 tv ✅ 🛠 mac-safer-cpp
✅ 🛠 tv-sim
✅ 🛠 watch
✅ 🛠 watch-sim

https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=295097

Reviewed by NOBODY (OOPS!).

According to the spec: "Even when font-variant-emoji is used, the
presence of Variation Selector 15 (U+FE0E) or Variation Selector 16
(U+FE0F) in the contents of an element override the rendering specified
in font-variant-emoji."
@carlosgcampos carlosgcampos added the Platform Portability improvements and other general platform improvements not driven directly by site bugs. label Jun 27, 2025
@webkit-ews-buildbot webkit-ews-buildbot added the merging-blocked Applied to prevent a change from being merged label Jun 27, 2025
@aperezdc aperezdc requested a review from litherum June 30, 2025 11:59
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
merging-blocked Applied to prevent a change from being merged Platform Portability improvements and other general platform improvements not driven directly by site bugs.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants