Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andy & Kouros

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Andranik Madadian. Don't ususally close on one !vote but after being up 3 weeks I can't see the discussion getting any better so wrapping it up now (non-admin closure)Davey2010Talk 20:58, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Andy & Kouros[edit]

Andy & Kouros (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Questionably notable group because there are many listed sources and my searches (including Newspapers Archive) simply found nothing thus with no obvious hope for improvement, I'm questioning keeping this. It is currently mentioned at Andranik Madadian's article but I'm not sure if this should be moved there or simply deleted and considering it was California-based, coverage would imaginably exclusively English. Pinging past user Werldwayd and SunCreator. SwisterTwister talk 20:42, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 20:44, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 20:44, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Iran-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 20:44, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Sam Sailor Talk! 01:57, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect to Andranik Madadian. Insufficient coverage for a separate article. Can be coveered quite adequately at Andranik Madadian. By the way, I did not find any archival newspaper coverage in Google, nor at newspapers.com. --Bejnar (talk) 03:16, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Sam Sailor Talk! 10:53, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.