User contributions for Mathglot
Appearance
A user with 80,516 edits. Account created on 22 October 2006.
20 June 2024
- 16:5416:54, 20 June 2024 diff hist +1,163 Talk:Legal positivism →The Lead: Maybe in a subsection down the body, but not in the lead, and not in those words, present in no other source. current
- 07:1607:16, 20 June 2024 diff hist +202 Talk:Legal positivism →The Lead: Replaced it with 'intellectual tradition' for now.
- 07:1407:14, 20 June 2024 diff hist +5 Legal positivism →top: For now, 'school of thought' ⟶ 'intellectual tradition' per objection at Talk.
- 05:4805:48, 20 June 2024 diff hist +5,316 Talk:Legal positivism →The Lead: Regarding 'contested label' : (a complete no-go, per the scarcity in sources), or 'school of thought' (not the best, just a previous version that was better); better expressions exist, here are some that show up in sources repeatedly; we can pick one of those.
- 04:1604:16, 20 June 2024 diff hist +1,886 Draft talk:Corveta Ipiranga V17 →I am withdrawing the article: You could leave the Draft up as a kind of "quarry" to mine for content to copy over into your new article. current
- 02:3402:34, 20 June 2024 diff hist +2,488 Draft talk:Corveta Ipiranga V17 →I am withdrawing the article: Some different approaches to think about.
- 00:1400:14, 20 June 2024 diff hist +1,514 User talk:Peoplelikeyou1234567 →Color articles and verifiability: Your edits at color articles were unsourced or contrary to given sources, and have been undone. current
19 June 2024
- 23:5423:54, 19 June 2024 diff hist +416 Brown →top: Sidebar hex color is A52A2A per the CSS Color Module Level 3, as recommended at Wikipedia:WikiProject Color/Sources for Color Coordinates. Please do not change the hex triplet without achieving consensus at the Talk page first, and/or the Color WikiProject. current
- 23:3223:32, 19 June 2024 diff hist +53 Britsum →top: Except for the last sentence about population, the lead is entirely unsourced. current
- 20:5520:55, 19 June 2024 diff hist +282 Wikipedia:Teahouse →Blocked IPs cannot purge page??: Does not change the page, may change what your browser displays.
- 11:3411:34, 19 June 2024 diff hist +1,281 Talk:Djamaa el Djazaïr →Should This Expansion-Translation Effort Stop Altogether?: All translated content, like all content, must meet WP:Verifiability and other policy constraints. current
- 11:2711:27, 19 June 2024 diff hist +62 Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a reliable source →top: Update lead to include copying and translating. current
- 11:2511:25, 19 June 2024 diff hist +120 N Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia is not a reliable source for citations elsewhere on Wikipedia/Archive 1 Mathglot moved page Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia is not a reliable source for citations elsewhere on Wikipedia/Archive 1 to Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia is not a reliable source/Archive 1 over redirect: Am sympathetic for why this is moved, but the new title is overly precise to the point of inaccuracy; for example, it is also unreliable for translating, or for copying source content. The point is, it is an SPS without editorial review. You're right about the confusion in the original title,... current Tag: New redirect
- 11:2511:25, 19 June 2024 diff hist 0 m Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia is not a reliable source/Archive 1 Mathglot moved page Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia is not a reliable source for citations elsewhere on Wikipedia/Archive 1 to Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia is not a reliable source/Archive 1 over redirect: Am sympathetic for why this is moved, but the new title is overly precise to the point of inaccuracy; for example, it is also unreliable for translating, or for copying source content. The point is, it is an SPS without editorial review. You're right about the confusion in the original title,... current
- 11:2511:25, 19 June 2024 diff hist +110 N Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia is not a reliable source for citations elsewhere on Wikipedia Mathglot moved page Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia is not a reliable source for citations elsewhere on Wikipedia to Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia is not a reliable source over redirect: Am sympathetic for why this is moved, but the new title is overly precise to the point of inaccuracy; for example, it is also unreliable for translating, or for copying source content. The point is, it is an SPS without editorial review. You're right about the confusion in the original title, but the new title is... current Tag: New redirect
- 11:2511:25, 19 June 2024 diff hist 0 m Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia is not a reliable source Mathglot moved page Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia is not a reliable source for citations elsewhere on Wikipedia to Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia is not a reliable source over redirect: Am sympathetic for why this is moved, but the new title is overly precise to the point of inaccuracy; for example, it is also unreliable for translating, or for copying source content. The point is, it is an SPS without editorial review. You're right about the confusion in the original title, but the new title is...
- 11:2511:25, 19 June 2024 diff hist +105 N Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a reliable source for citations elsewhere on Wikipedia Mathglot moved page Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a reliable source for citations elsewhere on Wikipedia to Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a reliable source over redirect: Am sympathetic for why this is moved, but the new title is overly precise to the point of inaccuracy; for example, it is also unreliable for translating, or for copying source content. The point is, it is an SPS without editorial review. You're right about the confusion in the original title, but the new title is worse; tr... current Tag: New redirect
- 11:2511:25, 19 June 2024 diff hist 0 m Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a reliable source Mathglot moved page Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a reliable source for citations elsewhere on Wikipedia to Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a reliable source over redirect: Am sympathetic for why this is moved, but the new title is overly precise to the point of inaccuracy; for example, it is also unreliable for translating, or for copying source content. The point is, it is an SPS without editorial review. You're right about the confusion in the original title, but the new title is worse; tr...
- 11:2211:22, 19 June 2024 diff hist 0 Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a reliable source Undid good-faith revision 1221771688 by Gobonobo (talk) see next summary. Tag: Undo
- 11:0211:02, 19 June 2024 diff hist +7 Legal positivism →top: 'school of thought' ⟶ 'modern school of thought', in order to contrast with natural law in S2 which we characterize as 'ancient'. As far as exactly how modern is "modern", we don't need to go into that level of detail here; that is already covered in ¶ 2.
- 10:5810:58, 19 June 2024 diff hist −4 Legal positivism →top: Lead: 'predetermined' ⟶ 'accepted' procedures; the latter is more accurate, and does a better job of incorporating the social aspect. Also, 'predetermined' has a possible undesirable whiff of Calvinism.
- 10:5110:51, 19 June 2024 diff hist +14 Legal positivism →Etymology and semantics: Rename section header (was: 'Etymology'). The added part distinguishing 'to posit' from 'positive' was necessary, but takes the description beyond just eytmology, to include semantics.
- 10:4910:49, 19 June 2024 diff hist +131 Legal positivism →Etymology: Expand, showing how the 'positivism' in 'legal positivism' is related to 'posit'. Tag SEP as weak for this.
- 10:4310:43, 19 June 2024 diff hist +183 Legal positivism →Etymology: Expand with the important derivational distinction between 'to posit', and 'positive' (as opposed to negative). Also needs a citation, but this is a crucial point as the term is so likely to confuse new readers unless explained in this way. Also, the SEP source at the end seems weak here; we can do better.
- 10:3810:38, 19 June 2024 diff hist +53 Legal positivism →Etymology: As long as we're including unsourced Latin derivations, let's start with a more accurate one first.
- 10:2410:24, 19 June 2024 diff hist +200 Legal positivism →top: Lead: add the important concept of LP being in opposition to natural law, what it is, and why it is rejected. Formerly, this was covered only by a cryptic, five-word parenthetical at the end of S1, which didn't really explain anything, especially for someone reading about LP for the first time. Let's try this instead. (Note also that the body is deficient in coverage of this and should be expanded). The body can/should take it back (if briefly) to Aristotle, Augustine, Aquinas, etc.
- 10:0610:06, 19 June 2024 diff hist +85 Legal positivism →Five contentions: The contrast with natural law is a key feature, and this one sentence should be expanded, possibly into its own subsection (and not under Hart), and of course, cited, which should be easy.
- 10:0210:02, 19 June 2024 diff hist +81 Legal positivism →Etymology: Latin derivation needs a citation. The SEP citation one sentence later does not cover this.
- 09:5609:56, 19 June 2024 diff hist +64 Legal positivism →top: Redo S2 of the lead to better summarize the body: S2 did talk about law without regard to morality, but said nothing about validity, which has its own entire section not covered thus far in the lead. Let's combine the two, summarizing the main point about vaidity here, and that said, morality fits right in here as well, as it is the rejected premise when working out what is valid law.
- 09:4709:47, 19 June 2024 diff hist +2 Legal positivism →top: Introduce paragraph break separating the defn and main aspects, from a brief summary of the history.
- 09:4509:45, 19 June 2024 diff hist −4 Legal positivism →top: Break up excessively long S1 into two after [[natural law|"natural"]]. The makes S2 about law and morality, which seems about right as far as where to introduce that aspect of it.
- 09:3909:39, 19 June 2024 diff hist +6 Legal positivism →top: Let's try to make this comprehensible to that large majority of readers that Wikimedia studies tell us will never read past the lead; in that light, 'constructed from social facts' ⟶ 'rules created by human beings' will prevent their eyes from glazing over 1/3 of the way into the lead sentence.
- 09:3309:33, 19 June 2024 diff hist +4 Legal positivism →top: Preposition; 'in' is by far the more usual here.
- 09:3009:30, 19 June 2024 diff hist +25 Legal positivism →top: Restored lead of rev. 1229366535 of 12:50, 16 June 2024 by Maurice Magnus because it is comprehensible, fairly summarizes the body, contains an accurate definition similar to long-term stable versions of the lead, and because it avoids the MOS:REFERS problem and OR use of the phrase 'contested label' which is not backed by the body or any secondary source. Having several meanings, aspects, or variants is not the same as 'contested'.
- 08:5208:52, 19 June 2024 diff hist 0 Template:Austronesian ships Note: The problem with param image_gap raised previously in Dec. 2023 has been fixed; use of param |image_gap= with images stacked vertically now works correctly. current
- 08:2608:26, 19 June 2024 diff hist −31 Legal positivism More header changes per MOS:NOBACKREF.
- 08:2108:21, 19 June 2024 diff hist −9 Legal positivism →Compared to legal realism: Rename header (was: 'Legal positivism and legal realism') per MOS:NOBACKREF.
- 08:0508:05, 19 June 2024 diff hist +100 Orange (colour) Infobox: add hidden advice about hex color=#FFA500 per the given source CSS Color Module Level 3, and advice at Wikipedia:WikiProject Color/Sources for Color Coordinates. Please do not change the hex triplet without achieving consensus at the Talk page first. current
- 08:0108:01, 19 June 2024 diff hist 0 Orange (colour) Undid revision 1226788162 by Peoplelikeyou1234567 (talk) Revert unexplained change to hex triplet (again), already sourced tp CSS Colour Module Level 3; see rev. 1197357406. Tag: Undo
- 07:3207:32, 19 June 2024 diff hist +45 Template:Organized crime groups in the Americas Group 3 (Brazil) : link group label. current
- 07:3007:30, 19 June 2024 diff hist +97 N List of organized crime groups in Brazil Creating as #REDIRECT List of criminal gangs in Brazil. current Tag: New redirect
- 05:2805:28, 19 June 2024 diff hist +250 Draft talk:Corveta Ipiranga V17 →I am withdrawing the article: Worth developing.
- 04:0404:04, 19 June 2024 diff hist +671 User talk:Obsidian Soul →Copying within Wikipedida: About attribution, when it's your own material.
- 03:3203:32, 19 June 2024 diff hist +486 User talk:Obsidian Soul →Nice work on maritime topics: Thanks for your contributions recently at various articles related to maritime topics.
- 02:3602:36, 19 June 2024 diff hist +98 N Template:Edit module request Creating as #REDIRECT Template:Edit template-protected. current Tag: New redirect
- 01:5401:54, 19 June 2024 diff hist −23 Phoenicia Undid revision 1229853241 by 197.207.21.29 (talk) Restore link, and sourced content. current Tag: Undo
- 01:5301:53, 19 June 2024 diff hist −16 Phoenicia Undid revision 1229853504 by 197.207.21.29 (talk) Unsourced. Tag: Undo
- 00:3300:33, 19 June 2024 diff hist +75 Template:Edit template-protected/doc →Usage: Include module-aliased usage example. current
- 00:3000:30, 19 June 2024 diff hist +98 N Template:Edit module-protected Creating as: #REDIRECT Template:Edit template-protected. current Tag: New redirect
- 00:2800:28, 19 June 2024 diff hist +117 Template:Edit template-protected/doc Make it clearer in the documentation that this template also applies for edit Module requests.