United Nations General Assembly Resolution 2758: Revision history

Filter revisionsshowhide

To date:

Tag filter:

Invert selection

External tools:

For any version listed below, click on its date to view it. For more help, see Help:Page history and Help:Edit summary. (cur) = difference from current version, (prev) = difference from preceding version, m = minor edit, → = section edit, ← = automatic edit summary

curprev 20:3920:39, 9 June 2024‎ 2405:9800:b870:b70b:c91b:dbbf:a9b8:cb2 talk‎ 31,860 bytes 0‎ No edit summary undo Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit

curprev 05:5905:59, 31 May 2024‎ Yoatari talk contribs‎ 31,860 bytes −1,426‎ 1) Ref. 21 is an inappropriate source for Miller's words, as it deliberately ignores the fact that Miller immediately took back his "no" words (See Ref. 22). 2) The 'Quote' field of Refs 17 and 18 was previously misused. undo Tag: Visual edit

curprev 02:5102:51, 24 May 2024‎ Yoatari talk contribs‎ m 35,864 bytes +28‎ Complete Ref. [12] undo Tag: Visual edit
curprev 02:4102:41, 24 May 2024‎ Yoatari talk contribs‎ 35,836 bytes +678‎ 1) Added an intro. para. to Controversy. 2) Rm'd the last para. which referred to "Proceedings" instead of "Controversy". 3) @Sheherherhers: Thanks for clarification. However, a CRS report does not represent the official policy of the US administrations. I think there is still a lot of work to be done to distinguish between the report writer's interpretation and the quoted official policy. Might make more sense to quote what the US delegation to UN said. I leave the text untouched for now. undo Tag: Visual edit

curprev 04:2104:21, 4 May 2024‎ Sheherherhers talk contribs‎ 35,158 bytes +129‎ →‎Controversy: -according to the original source, "the US" is the subject this statement was simply applied with no specified individual, thus taking it as an official stance by the government undo

curprev 15:3215:32, 3 May 2024‎ Yoatari talk contribs‎ 35,029 bytes −1,516‎ Reorganised the text of the Controversy section in the order of the parties involved: first the Taipei government, then the US, then other parties. The sentences themselves remain untouched, so the problems previously mentioned remain: 1) vague words, 2) citation of non-government media when there are official documents, 3) lack of time and citations, 4) events not organised in chronological order. undo Tag: Visual edit
curprev 14:5614:56, 3 May 2024‎ Yoatari talk contribs‎ m 36,545 bytes +130‎ Marking of questionable words in the Controversy section. [A checkpoint before adapting for a better logic of the text flow] undo Tag: Visual edit