Jump to content

United Nations General Assembly Resolution 2758: Revision history


For any version listed below, click on its date to view it. For more help, see Help:Page history and Help:Edit summary. (cur) = difference from current version, (prev) = difference from preceding version, m = minor edit, → = section edit, ← = automatic edit summary

(newest | oldest) View (newer 250 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

26 June 2024

10 June 2024

9 June 2024

31 May 2024

  • curprev 05:5905:59, 31 May 2024Yoatari talk contribs 31,860 bytes −1,426 1) Ref. 21 is an inappropriate source for Miller's words, as it deliberately ignores the fact that Miller immediately took back his "no" words (See Ref. 22). 2) The 'Quote' field of Refs 17 and 18 was previously misused. undo Tag: Visual edit

30 May 2024

29 May 2024

26 May 2024

24 May 2024

  • curprev 02:5102:51, 24 May 2024Yoatari talk contribsm 35,864 bytes +28 Complete Ref. [12] undo Tag: Visual edit
  • curprev 02:4102:41, 24 May 2024Yoatari talk contribs 35,836 bytes +678 1) Added an intro. para. to Controversy. 2) Rm'd the last para. which referred to "Proceedings" instead of "Controversy". 3) @Sheherherhers: Thanks for clarification. However, a CRS report does not represent the official policy of the US administrations. I think there is still a lot of work to be done to distinguish between the report writer's interpretation and the quoted official policy. Might make more sense to quote what the US delegation to UN said. I leave the text untouched for now. undo Tag: Visual edit

4 May 2024

3 May 2024

  • curprev 15:3215:32, 3 May 2024Yoatari talk contribs 35,029 bytes −1,516 Reorganised the text of the Controversy section in the order of the parties involved: first the Taipei government, then the US, then other parties. The sentences themselves remain untouched, so the problems previously mentioned remain: 1) vague words, 2) citation of non-government media when there are official documents, 3) lack of time and citations, 4) events not organised in chronological order. undo Tag: Visual edit
  • curprev 14:5614:56, 3 May 2024Yoatari talk contribsm 36,545 bytes +130 Marking of questionable words in the Controversy section. [A checkpoint before adapting for a better logic of the text flow] undo Tag: Visual edit

1 May 2024

30 April 2024

4 April 2024

10 March 2024

20 February 2024

10 February 2024

21 January 2024

16 January 2024

15 January 2024

14 January 2024

31 December 2023

29 December 2023

22 December 2023

15 December 2023

4 December 2023

3 December 2023

30 October 2023

25 October 2023

17 September 2023

12 September 2023

8 September 2023

7 September 2023

6 September 2023

27 August 2023

21 August 2023

29 July 2023

20 July 2023

10 July 2023

9 July 2023

27 June 2023

3 June 2023

1 June 2023

18 May 2023

2 May 2023

23 April 2023

10 April 2023

23 March 2023

8 March 2023

7 March 2023

19 January 2023

13 January 2023

29 December 2022

9 November 2022

2 November 2022

26 October 2022

24 September 2022

29 August 2022

27 August 2022

19 August 2022

12 August 2022

  • curprev 02:3602:36, 12 August 2022Matt Smith talk contribs 24,577 bytes +214 It was just phrased not clear enough rather than being dishonest. Please avoid overreacting. undo
  • curprev 00:1300:13, 12 August 2022125.209.140.101 talk 24,363 bytes −236 →‎Background: This was framed very dishonestly, it made out Japan had control of Taiwan up until 1951, this is however false, Japan had zero control of Taiwan right at the end of WW2 when Japanese forces evacuated. The ROC thus had control of Taiwan since the end of WW2, the Japanese didn't rule Taiwan until the San Francisco treaty in 1951 (which this dishonest page implies). Seriously wikipedia, hire some paid professionals, the Wumao infestation is getting ridiculous. undo Tag: references removed

10 August 2022

28 July 2022

16 July 2022

26 May 2022

13 May 2022

24 April 2022

6 March 2022

3 March 2022

2 March 2022

19 February 2022

1 February 2022

25 January 2022

24 January 2022

20 January 2022

19 January 2022

13 January 2022

28 November 2021

21 November 2021

10 November 2021

31 October 2021

29 October 2021

28 October 2021

16 September 2021

29 July 2021

19 July 2021

30 June 2021

  • curprev 06:0606:06, 30 June 202167.188.0.91 talk 23,648 bytes +72 →‎Later developments: It should be stressed that even when the UN acknowledges "Taiwan is part of China", it does not refer to the PRC which has never taken over Taiwan and its associated islands from the ROC although it is also true that Resolution 2758 effectively excludes the ROC from continued representation within the UN. undo
  • curprev 05:5805:58, 30 June 202167.188.0.91 talk 23,576 bytes −85 →‎Later developments: Removed potentially misleading details. No matter what submissions and debates there were regarding the adoption of Resolution 2758, the end result is that Resolution 2758 makes no reference to Taiwan to remain "deliberately ambiguous" as the ROC continued to exist and retain control over Taiwan and its outlying islands. What matters is what the resolution itself mentions or does not mention as anything outside would have no effect. undo

18 June 2021

4 June 2021

30 January 2021

17 January 2021

5 January 2021

20 December 2020

1 December 2020

18 November 2020

17 November 2020

11 November 2020

24 October 2020

18 October 2020

23 September 2020

27 August 2020

17 May 2020

13 May 2020

5 May 2020

29 April 2020

22 April 2020

15 April 2020

1 April 2020

3 March 2020

18 February 2020

16 February 2020

7 February 2020

5 February 2020

15 January 2020

25 November 2019

24 November 2019

15 October 2019

3 October 2019

25 September 2019

14 September 2019

5 September 2019

15 August 2019

12 August 2019

1 August 2019

16 July 2019

14 July 2019

13 June 2019

10 March 2019

6 March 2019

3 March 2019

2 March 2019

  • curprev 12:5312:53, 2 March 2019Frenchmalawi talk contribs 22,321 bytes +58 The existence of the People's Republic of China, they declared, was a reality which could not be changed by the existence of the Republic of China on Taiwan.” The sentence was based on pg. 127 of the UN Year Book. But that says something entirely different, which I reflect here. undo

30 January 2019

13 January 2019

23 December 2018

3 December 2018

23 November 2018

19 November 2018

13 November 2018

12 November 2018

26 October 2018

26 August 2018

25 August 2018

18 July 2018

2 June 2018

31 May 2018

5 May 2018

28 April 2018

12 April 2018

29 March 2018

(newest | oldest) View (newer 250 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)