Avatar

Macleod Sawyer

@macleod / macleod.tumblr.com

Director of DNX Industries, an industrial robotics laboratory — dnxi.org. macleodsawyer.com
Avatar

Tide-predicting machine designed by William Thomson (later Lord Kelvin), built by A. Légé & Co., 20 Cross Street, Hatton Gardens, London, 1872. The machine is a mechanical analogue computer which traces the tidal curve for a given location, by combining ten astronomical components. It is the first working machine of Thomson’s design, based on his application of harmonic analysis to tidal phenomena.

Each of the ten components has a shaft with an overhead crank which carries a pulley pivoted on a parallel axis adjustable for the range applying to that place. The shafts are geared together so that their periods are broadly proportional to the periods of the tidal constituents. On each shaft the crank can be turned and clamped in any position corresponding to the epoch of tide required. The machine was able to draw the tidal curves of one harbour for one year in about four hours.

Avatar

I don't really understand this whole "gen z doesn't know how to use tech", because most of them understand basic tech hygiene, capabilities, expectations, and extremely basic troubleshooting far better than any other generation — and the the ones who know a little bit more than the basics? They tend to know a lot more than those older than them in the same category.

Even if we continue down the line to the "actually they mean AlphaZ" then they are definitely farther ahead in those basic reqs than the people I went to school with a decade ago.

Sure, yeah, a lot of the people I went to high school with now understand tech, but back then? The extent of their knowledge tended to be how far away I was from them to help.

The only thing that I could imagine being right about the statement is that there are more people than average (basically, all) of them at their age (12-18) that use tech, but don't quite understand anything more than the basics compared to those who used technology in that same age range — Only because those in the older generations in that same age group (and used tech) tended to have a priori, influence, or environment that either required more knowledge to do the most basic things on worse hardware, or they had a unique interest at that age and the means to get their hands on it.

tl;dr, the kids are alright and probably understand basic tech better than you did at their age.

Avatar
At the art space "StandBy" [..], the installation "Paldarium Tachiko & Yasutoshi" is being held by the creative group "AMKK (Toshin, Flower and Tree Research Institute)" that pursues new values of flowers and plants. On display in this exhibition are a group of works in which pine bonsai are placed in a miniature version of the paludarium, a miniature greenhouse that was popular as a pastime for aristocrats in 19th century England. By incorporating the function of artificially incorporating water, wind, light, and sound with modern technology, we have created an environment where plants can grow regardless of the external environment.
Avatar
Each Gireaffenap pod features an alarm system that can be set by the user, as well as support points for the various parts of the body – head, buttocks, calves, and feet, to ensure that the user maintains their upright position when napping. The pods also feature a height adjustment system so that anyone can achieve the perfect posture while using them.
Avatar

I have no problem being optimistic about LK-99, even if it fails to meet the rather high expectation of total technological revolution, but I am happy to be more optimistic than I am pessimistic about any potential future better than our present.

You can be highly optimistic and still reasonably understand the low chance of success of any one, or multiple, things that could be a net-benefit in the off-chance of success. There is no need to chastise those that had high hopes and excitement because you are more nihilistic in your own expectations

Avatar
Avatar
macleod

I know this tweet was sort of in jest, but they are. There are many many different projects working on this exact thing.

For every developer working on the latest predictive text algorithm, there is likely one or more that are working on either using the same algorithm, or an entirely different project working on real world-changing world-bettering solutions.

  • UNEP's World Environment Situation Room (WESR), launched in 2022, WESR curates, aggregates and visualizes the best available earth observation and sensor data to inform near real-time analysis and future predictions on multiple factors, including CO2 atmospheric concentration, changes in glacier mass and sea level rise.
  • Microsofts AI team has the "Ocean Cleanup" project that uses machine learning to identify plastic pollution in rivers and simulate how it moves in the ocean. These insights power passive cleanup systems to help remove plastic that impacts our ecosystems.
  • GarbageNet uses machine learning to divert compost and recyclables from landfills.
  • The BeachBot is a specially designed machine that can identify and remove small items of litter from beaches. It uses image recognition to find cigarette butts in the sand and picks them up.
  • The GEMS Air Pollution Monitoring platform is the largest global air quality information network in the world. IQAir aggregates data from over 25,000 air quality monitoring stations in more than 140 countries and leverages AI to offer insights on the impact of real-time air quality on populations and help inform health protection measures.
  • Seoul, South Korea is testing using AI tech to sort recyclables in a “Superbin” reverse vending machine. The technology recognises the material and recyclability of a bottle or a can by using a machine learning algorithm. Next, the robot compresses and stores the materials based on its reading.
  • 25% of all water is wasted, WINT developed an AI to detect and stop leaks at the source. WINT does this by using pattern matching to detect water leaks. 

There are thousands of these projects, and a lot of the technical innovation in things such as ChatGPT or other AI tools you see are being used in ways that we can't even imagine at this very moment.

Engineers work to build a better world, they aren't a monolithic techbro capitalist that loves to throw processing power at a problem to make money from the fumes. A lot of engineers are actively working to apply all these new technologies to making the world a better place.

Avatar
reblogged

itt ergonomic keyboard

what in gods name am i looking at

the left side is where i place my typing orb

So not to derail, but this is what’s called a one handed keyboard. Obviously, that means it’s designed to be used with one hand. While this is something that a few professionals who do hella typing and mouse clicking prefer, as it means not switching your right hand back and forth between input devices, the primary purpose is, of course, to allow people with the user of my one hand to have maximal use of their computers. People missing a hand, as well as people with partial paralysis are the primary market.

They come in right and left hand versions, and this itt board is one of the more expensive models, but the curvature really is (according to reviews) excellent for helping prevent fatigue and repetitive strain injuries on the one hand that’s doing the work of two.

Just thought I’d share. Accessible computing is a seriously under appreciated field and while I admit the keyboard is quite striking to look at, the engineering and consideration that has gone into its design really cannot be over stated.

Avatar
macleod

if you ever see a piece of technology and go 'egads! why on earth would anyone want to use that‽' assume you aren't the target market

Avatar

New CRISPR cancer treatment tested in humans for first time

Researchers have made an important step forward toward a long-desired goal: using the gene-editing technology CRISPR to treat cancer. [Source: Time]

Now, PACT Pharma and UCLA have used CRISPR to remove and add genes to these cells to help them recognize a patient’s specific tumor cells. [...]

By genetically engineering T cells to be better at spotting proteins commonly found on the surfaces of blood cancer cells, researchers have been able to develop treatments — called “CAR-T cell therapies” — for people with those cancers. [..]

Using CRISPR, they knocked out a gene for an existing receptor and inserted a gene for a cancer-targeting receptor into T cells that lacked it. Once they had engineered what they thought would be enough T cells, the researchers infused them back into the patient.

The results: Later biopsies found that up to 20% of the immune cells in the patients’ tumors were the engineered T cells, suggesting that those cells were in fact very adept at homing in on the cancer.

Only two of the 16 participants experienced minor side effects — fever, chills, confusion — attributable to the T cells, but they quickly resolved. [..]

A month after treatment, five of the patients’ tumors were the same size as before, suggesting that the engineered cells may have had a stabilizing effect on their condition.

---------

My thoughts: While the results weren't absolutely mind-staggering, 100% fantastic, the amount that they were able to keep the cancer cells at bay, and normalize the growth is tremendously great.

The researchers went on to say that this may be due to their purposeful limited attack methods, and that this is something they can build on and truly develop a personalized life-saving or extending treatment for cancer.

“We are reprogramming a patient’s immune system to target their own cancer, [..] It’s a living drug, so you can give one dose and ideally have life-long protection [from the cancer].”
Avatar
reblogged

obligatory post after my joke post about how a crt could kill you, and how it can zap you with some static with the case shut:

While working on an open CRT can be dangerous, the amount of danger involved is often overblown to the point of discouraging people from safe and sane repair and adjustment. Do not touch under the anode cap with your fingers, don’t stick your hands in the flyback, don’t touch caps and other storage spaces for energy that you’re not sure are discharged or at a safe level (the human body doesn’t need a lot of current to get hurt!)

I’ve known some fairly prolific repairers of tube equipment, and while you do get desensitized to danger the longer you do something, overall, the impression I’ve gotten is that “common sense” electrical safety is what is needed, and that scaring people further just means people are afraid to ever try. Also, people often don’t recognize there’s much more danger in many every day situations just by how much more likely it is for you to underestimate a potential danger, or for it to occur.

You will not get hurt adjusting the knobs on the other side of the tube. Just trust me. Maybe don’t copy some of my “workbench” setups, though:

Avatar
commodorez

Excellent points!

I recently witnessed a technical help chat wherein the dangers were not properly conveyed, and rather a blanket "just don't" was recommended instead. After which, the person was banned from the space, and now you have someone who not only has no guidance on what the actual dangers are, but they're now flying blind and my just go in and touch the wrong thing.

CRTs are not magic. But they are mysterious if all you've ever been exposed to are LCDs. So, let's de-mystify them in your mind with one of the single best CRT experts in North America.

Each video covers something a little different, but either way, you'll learn the thought process required to approach them and handle them safely.

Avatar

Watching the launch of the Artemis I rocket last night from NASA was incredible — there are several shots that truly look like a music visualizer that could have only been run in winamp, with its pulsating beams of explosive transcendent exhaust propelling the craft through the backdrop of the black void called night. I've included my favorite moment above.

This rocket, the most powerful in history and the world, will be circling the moon and return to earth over the next six days. This is the first step to get us back to the moon. Artemis II is expected to launch with a full crew to flyby around the moon in 2024, followed closely by Artemis III which will feature a landing party to begin the preparations for setting up our first exoplanetary pseudo-permanent base on the moon (Artemis IV/V are developing the Lunar Gateway space station for easy travel to and from the surface of the moon), the current launch of Artemis III is scheduled for 2025/2026. This will be the first time we will have been back to the moon since 1972.

Avatar
reblogged
Avatar
punk-jaskier

I also want better public transport that doesn't rely on me having to have a car.

Avatar
macleod

As much as I understand the general context, I want to stress there is nothing stopping us from having both — and statements like this create a false dichotomy of Leisure vs Technology and Science.

8k TVs and self driving cars, four day work weeks, rent control, universal healthcare, higher wages, are all and even more compatible the more entrenched you get in the thought.

If we had a four day work week, we would have less people stressed, more creativity and enthusiasm for the world they live in and their leisurely needs to be met. By building 8k/12k televisions, having self driving cars, better game systems, better infrastructure, all of this extends the leisure we can have! Technology isn't a capitalist invention as much as they want us to think, technology is a tool for making life a little bit easier and nearly all of it stems from hungry, angry, aching people who want to make cool shit that makes theirs and our collective reality just a little bit better!

Technology and science is progressive and as worker-focused as you can get in a material sense. There is no reason why we can't have both.

Avatar

In France, all new and existing medium to large parking lots will have to be covered by solar panels

In France, solar just got a huge boost from new legislation approved through the Senate this week that requires all parking lots with spaces for at least 80 vehicles – both existing and new – be covered by solar panels.

Starting July 1, 2023, smaller carparks that have between 80 and 400 spaces will have five years to be in compliance with the new measures. Carparks with more than 400 spaces have a shorter timeline: They will need to comply with the new measures within three years of this date, and at least half of the surface area of the parking lot will need to be covered in solar panels.

Other measures on the table include building large solar farms on vacant land found alongside highways and railways, as well as on agricultural lands where feasible.

France’s national rail service SNCF also plans to install some 190,000 square meters of solar panels in 156 stations throughout the country by 2025 and 1.1 million square meters by 2030, all with the aim to reduce energy consumption by 25%.

The government also plans to build around 50 additional wind farms likes the one offshore Saint-Nazaire by 2050 in France. Measures are in place to reduce delays in building offshore wind farms from 10-12 years down to six years, and large solar farms from six years to three years.

You are using an unsupported browser and things might not work as intended. Please make sure you're using the latest version of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, or Edge.