We meet so seldom by stock or stone

1.5M ratings
277k ratings

See, that’s what the app is perfect for.

Sounds perfect Wahhhh, I don’t wanna
vandroid-helsing
caparrucia

Rings my fucking bell, like a perennial fucking plague maiden:

Center harm, not disgust!

When in doubt (and when not in doubt, just swept by problems bigger than you and assured by someone that they know the answer, so don't think right now, just Do!), center harm.

Focus on what specific harm you're reducing with your actions. Make sure it's tangible and concrete. If your actions are minimizing hypothetical harm at the cost of real, tangible harm on others, 9 out 10 times you're on the wrong fucking side, being weaponized by propaganda.

If a conversation revolves around disgust as a driver for action, you're being radicalized. If a call to action depends on your emotional response, you're being manipulated. I'm sorry, this isn't the 90s anymore, social media has eroded the web of respectability of the pre internet society. The primary axis for misinformation to spread in this day and age is emotional response: half the things you believe are true and share as such are not based on fact, expert opinion or personal research. Social media has conditioned us (all of us! You and me and most dangerously of all, the idiots we put in power) that if something feels true, it probably is.

But do you know for sure it is? Do you think it's true because you have first hand experience or actual time spent on reputable sources learning it to be fact? Or just because it aligns with your worldview and it would be nice for you if it were true?

Are you taking action because you're angry and a group of fellow angry folk invited you to join them? Do you have a plan or is this just catharsis? Are you aware of the consequences of your actions or are you drunk on rage and focused only on the immediate future?

Center harm. Center specific actions and their consequences.

Discomfort is not harm. Disgust is not harm. Hypothetical paranoia is not harm.

The reactionary pipeline is real and your self-image as a progressive is not actually enough to save you from falling down the hole. Radicalization is not hinged on politics alone. Saying you're a leftist is worthless if your thought process and actions themselves are indistinguishable from qanon losers. Conspiratorial thought has literally no politics inherently, and your insistence it does is pure lack of critical thought on display.

Center harm, not feelings, not politics, not group think.

Center harm, and remember that individual actions cannot dismantle systemic structures on their own, so anyone who calls for individual action at the cost of community structures is not actually trying to change anything, and instead actively suppressing efforts to make anything better in any way.

Pinned Post new pinned post see also: conflict is not abuse
raths-ruin
teaboot

Linguistic wizards why does vocabulary inflection and intonation change wildly when I’m happy, furious, or serious. What part of your brain makes u talk like completely different people in different circumstances and is this universal across languages. And why does regional accent drop sometimes. What makes that happen

teaboot

Like

(Dude almost smokes me with his car) Holy Jesus fuckin’ Christ, watch yer fuckin’ window ya fuckin’ jackass, damn near clipped me with yer goddamn six-foot-twelve piece of shit

(Chilling with siblings) Sup nerd. Yeah no I just gotta grab some shit at the store, back in a sec. You want anything? Gonna grab snacks for the movie. Cool, see you in a bit.

(Speaking with someone on the phone) I’m sorry, I’m afraid she’s not on site at the moment. If you’d like, I can take your name and number and have her call you back. Of course. And would you like to leave a message?

(Mildly annoyed) I Will Grasp The Reins Of The Chariot Of God And Drive Us Both Into The Fiery Depths Of Hell

official-linguistics-post

official linguistics post (the answer is that you're using different registers)

teaboot

YOOOOOOOO

language
butchpaulsimon
butchpaulsimon

no matter how little you think you know about history you shouldn’t beat yourself up over it because there is always someone who knows less than you and is more confident about it. someone once said that bridgerton was medieval to me

butchpaulsimon

another person also thought that the middle ages were the period in between wwi and wwii so you should always be proud of yourself for having any sort of knowledge about the medieval period. i’m proud of you for not thinking fdr was an important medieval figure.

knight-of-skyloft
wild-aspen

I still think about that person who questioned the graph showing how many hate crimes Jews are currently facing in the USA.

First, they doubted it because they wanted to know how the numbers were gathered and how they defined an act of antisemitism. The source was right there, but I gave them a summary anyway.

But even that right there was a sign of antisemitism at work.

If this was about trans hate crimes they wouldn’t have batted an eye. They wouldn’t have asked “how did they figure out those numbers? how did they define what is and is not a transphobic act?”. They just would have accepted the numbers.

That’s because trans people can be trusted to define what is and is not transphobia.

But if you have unconscious antisemitic sentiments, you will never trust a Jew to define what is and is not antisemitism, because you’ve been told to always assume Jews have a secret agenda.

In this case, you’ve been told that secret agenda is Zionism, and EVERYTHING comes back to that.

The Jews who put together this survey weren’t “trustworthy” because one of the criteria out of many mentioned criticism of Israel as a cover for antisemitism. It doesn’t matter that the paper clarified that criticism of Israel isn’t inherently antisemitic. It doesn’t matter that it listed the amounts of each individual kind of abuse faced. Israel was mentioned, therefore the Jews are lying.

antisemitism
kitkatsnow
weeee

image
image

Time shifting

––

I wanted this but the original poster is transphobic

anarchopuppy

This is called the "analog loophole" and there's nothing anyone can do to stop it. They can encrypt and copy-protect all they want, but eventually the file has to be sent to a speaker and/or screen, and it has to get there in a human-readable form because that's the whole dang point

The simplest way to exploit the analog loophole is just pointing a camera at a screen or a microphone at a speaker, but direct recording is also always possible and always will be. Anything that can be displayed can be saved and displayed again

autumngracy

Back in the day, people also used to share software over the radio with this technology. Because computer programs and files are really just sets of binary code, and that code can be turned into audio tones.

The resulting audio file can be played over the radio (sounding a bit like the old dial up noise, as it's just two quickly oscillating notes) and recorded to a cassette tape, which you can then give to your computer to "decode" back into 0's and 1's, which gives you the program file. You can then run it as if you'd installed it from a disk.

NPR did a very cool podcast about this.

supremecodemagenemica

Lads. We used to put phones on computer peripherals.

bacony-cakes
mortalityplays

"I'm in my late 20s and I'm scared I've already peaked" just don't peak then, idiot. what do you mean like you're going to just stop trying to think harder and build taller and learn more and get luckier and read deeper and dress better and fuck weirder and run faster and draw crazier and smoke danker and dance bigger and steal better and stun everyone with your cunty charm and zeal because, what, you think those are the rules? get real. get up. you have another 50 years and you're not going to use them??? give them to me.

moonske

image