Jump to content

Steward requests/Permissions/2023-07

Add links
From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki

Administrator access

Penaku@gorwiktionary

Status:    Done

Hello., this request is for new administrator access in gorwiktionary. Marwan Mohamad (talk) 11:37, 11 June 2023 (UTC)

Where was this advertised that meets MVR? -- Amanda (she/her) 13:38, 13 June 2023 (UTC)
Hi. Could you please elaborate on what you mean by "advertised that meets MVR"? Thank you. ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 04:46, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
Thanks for helping ask the problem. CC: @StevenJ81:, Regards... Marwan Mohamad (talk) 09:20, 17 June 2023 (UTC)
@Marwan Mohamad, sorry for the confusing question. What we need to know is for you to demonstrate how you have advertised the page wikt:gor:Wikikamus:Hihile mowali Tā mongurusi Penaku 5 Juni 2023 to other community members. Normally it is done via linking to such page or transcluding it into the project's Administrator page or the project's village pump or forum. In this case I see that there are no links to this page, the page for administrators, wikt:gor:Wikikamus:Pengurus does not exist, neither does the community portal, wikt:gor:Wikikamus:Būbu'a lēmbo'a. Is there some on wiki place where the nomination was mentioned that I might be missing? If not, could you please, for example create the community portal, and link to the nomination there? The reason we want this is because we want to ensure that people do not just notify their friends about the nomination on social media or so (which is a phenomenon that referred to as canvassing) whilst there might potentially be some community members who have to say something against the candidate but have no chance to learn about the nomination. --Base (talk) 02:53, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
@Base: sorry for late reply. I've created a page which is a community portal, wikt:gor:Wikikamus:Būbu'a lēmbo'a and shared the admin request link in this page. Please check to see if it's correct. Thank You. Marwan Mohamad (talk) 18:09, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Marwan Mohamad, I have forgotten to reply you, yes, that is correct. In the future you might want to move the discussion forum to a separate page and keep the community portal to be a portal, but for very small wikis that is usually the central place for the discussions. --Base (talk) 14:14, 14 July 2023 (UTC)

Penaku, Done Granted for 3 months to expire on 2023-10-14. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks.. --Base (talk) 14:14, 14 July 2023 (UTC)

Marwan Mohamad@gorwiktionary

Status:    Done

Hello, my admin rights will expire on July 20, 2023. I want and request to extend admin again and become interface admin. Marwan Mohamad (talk) 11:23, 11 June 2023 (UTC)

Where was this advertised that meets MVR? -- Amanda (she/her) 13:38, 13 June 2023 (UTC)
Sorry for late reply. Could you please elaborate on what you mean by "advertised that meets MVR"? Cc: @StevenJ81: Regards... Marwan Mohamad (talk) 09:17, 17 June 2023 (UTC)
Hi @Marwan Mohamad, the MVR page (see link) requires requests for admin permissions to happen on (or to be linked from) the Village pump or Admin's noticeboard. This to ensure everyone has had the chance to find and comment on the request. Where was your request advised to the community, please? Thank you, Martin Urbanec (talk) 12:15, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
(Not to dulicate my comment, the same I wrote in Penaku's section also applies here). --Base (talk) 02:53, 30 June 2023 (UTC)

Marwan Mohamad, Done Granted for 1 year to expire on 2024-07-14. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks.. --Base (talk) 14:15, 14 July 2023 (UTC)

[email protected]

Status:    Done

Dear sir, Thai Wikiquote Administrator rights of User:Tvcccp expires on July 22nd, so I nominated him to be elected to serve as a permanent administrator. (If possible) Regards.--B20180 (talk) 17:37, 5 July 2023 (UTC)

B20180, Tvcccp, Done Granted for 1 year to expire on 2024-07-14. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks.. Unfortunately the discussion does not meet the minimum voting requirements for the permanent permissions, nor there are other factors to make it permanent (for example I would also handle permanent permissions if it was already their 4th or so year of temporary adminship). --Base (talk) 14:24, 14 July 2023 (UTC)

[email protected]

Status:    Done

Dear sir, I've approached User:Kaoavi to serve as an administrator on the Wikiquote project. He is happy to be considered by the community. (P.S. User:Kaoavi already has some experience and understanding of policies.) Regards. --B20180 (talk) 17:37, 5 July 2023 (UTC)

Kaoavi, B20180, Done Granted for 6 months to expire on 2024-01-14. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks.. --Base (talk) 14:26, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
@Base: In the discussion page Kaoavi wants IA right coupled with admin right. Thanks. --Lookruk 💬 (Talk) 03:34, 15 July 2023 (UTC)

[email protected]

Status:    Done

I'd request a renewal of my adminstrator and interface administrator access to stqwiki. If possible, permanent access (as long as it is needed). Murma174 (talk) 20:20, 5 July 2023 (UTC)

Done Granted for 2 years to expire on 2025-07-09. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. --Martin Urbanec (talk) 11:23, 9 July 2023 (UTC)
Thank you! --Murma174 (talk) 20:09, 9 July 2023 (UTC)

KuboF [email protected]

Status:    Done

After automatic loose of admin rights after 1 year (Esperanto Wikivoyage is a small project) I have asked for the admin rights for 3rd time. The community voting was small but entirely positive. --KuboF Hromoslav (talk) 19:00, 10 July 2023 (UTC)

Done, granted for 1 year. --Hoo man (talk) 06:37, 13 July 2023 (UTC)

[email protected]

Status:    Done

My last sysopship expired in December and I wasn't all that active at the time so let it expire, but apparently there are spam and related tasks to deal with so would be nice to be a sysop again. Vote was conducted late last month. Mithridates (talk) 04:15, 12 July 2023 (UTC)

Done, granted for one year! --Hoo man (talk) 10:27, 14 July 2023 (UTC)

[email protected]

Status:    Locally handled

I'd like to request admin rights on sk wikiquote. The only bureaucrat on the project may seem active due to his obviously robotic edits, but he clearly doesn't respond to any of my (or other users') requests, even on other projects (see here here or here. Therefore, I have to ask you for the rights this way. Thank you in advance. --V0lkanic (talk) 15:24, 10 July 2023 (UTC)

Question Question: So let's clarify your request above: You came to the Slovak Wikiquote, made literally 200 edits in the span of 4 days of which nearly none with summary and about one third of them seems to be robotical, on that 4th day you have submitted your RfA and after 14 days without a single vote you came here complaining for no response or action taken on that and furthermore requesting that adminship here? — The preceding unsigned comment was added by 90.176.96.41 (talk) 21:26, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
First of all, the project has literally no community and it has been like that basically for years (since around 2010). There is no other person adding any content or at least categories, correcting typos, anything like that (except for the 1 sysop and bureacraut using robotic edits to do some maintenance who clearly isn't responding to - not only my - requests). None of my edits are robotic. Yes, I actually did spend hours trying to add categorries, add articles to the appropriate date page or fix some of the article introductions. The total number of edits I've made so far is 900, which unfortunately already ranks me as the 6th most active user ever on the project (by total edit count). In this request, I am not complaining about anything, I only try to explain the situation on the project and the unfortunate inactivity of the only bureaucrat who is the only user able to take any action. Using the admin rights, I'd try to do some maintenance on the project and I believe that the 3 month period is certainly enough for that as as of this date, there is no point in being a sysop for any longer (as there is noone to even patrol etc., simply zero users). V0lkanic (talk) 10:17, 12 July 2023 (UTC)

The request can be closed, the local bureaucrat replied after repeated insistence. --V0lkanic (talk) 11:36, 19 July 2023 (UTC)

@V0lkanic: marking closed as handled locally, however that may be. — xaosflux Talk 14:11, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
Question Question: @V0lkanic: For the records and future tracking, could you please provide links to that repeated insistence you have mentioned? — The preceding unsigned comment was added by 90.176.96.41 (talk)
add unsigned template above --Minorax«¦talk¦» 15:34, 22 July 2023 (UTC)

[email protected]

Status:    Done

Hi, we need new permanent admin at Saraiki language Wikipedia. He is very hardworking user.--Ameen Akbar (talk) 19:31, 12 July 2023 (UTC)

Done Granted for 6 months to expire on 2024-01-18. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. --Wim b 16:33, 18 July 2023 (UTC)
Thanks, Engr.ismailbhutta (talk) 05:35, 22 July 2023 (UTC)

[email protected]

Status:    Done

I would like to request for Adminship for the Ghanaian Pidgin Wikipedia. If possible, permanent access as I am very active on the project. Thanks daSupremo 23:39, 14 July 2023 (UTC)

Done Granted for 3 months to expire on 2023-10-18. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. --Wim b 16:40, 18 July 2023 (UTC)
@Wim b Noted with thanks daSupremo 16:37, 19 July 2023 (UTC)

हिंदुस्थान वासी@hi.wikipedia

Status:    Done

It is requested to grant this user temporary admin rights (for 3 months at least). User has performed admin duties from 2017 to 2021 and well aware of local policies. Thanks. अजीत कुमार तिवारी (talk) 04:02, 17 July 2023 (UTC)

Done Granted for 3 months to expire on 2023-10-18. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. --Wim b 16:41, 18 July 2023 (UTC)

[email protected]

Status:    Done

Khomphoi28 adminship was expired on 27 July 2023 he wants to renew right. Thanks. --Lookruk 💬 (Talk) 23:56, 18 July 2023 (UTC)

Done Granted for 6 months to expire on 2024-01-19. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. --Mykola 10:36, 19 July 2023 (UTC)

[email protected]

Status:    Done

One more admin. Thanks. --Lookruk 💬 (Talk) 23:56, 18 July 2023 (UTC)

Done Granted for 6 months to expire on 2024-01-19. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. --Mykola 10:36, 19 July 2023 (UTC)

RalvahKaset@kmwiktionary

Status:    Done

Hi, RalvahKaset wishes to regain the adminship and would also like to apply for the interface adminship for at least a week. This will help me complete some tasks, like editing MediaWiki pages. Thank you. – RalvahKaset (talk) 06:17, 21 July 2023 (UTC)

Done Granted for 6 months to expire on 2024-01-21. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. --Mykola 09:43, 21 July 2023 (UTC)

Jamex18@guwwikiquote

Status:    Done

I would like to request an extension on my admin rights. Thank you. Jamex18 (talk) 15:26, 25 July 2023 (UTC)

Done Granted for 6 months to expire on 2024-01-26. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. --Mykola 14:13, 26 July 2023 (UTC)

Interface administrator access

Kuldhar [email protected]

Status:    Done

I request both admin and interface admin rights for Assamese Wikiquote. If granted, I would be happy to work for the further improvement of the Assamese wikiquote. Kuldhar Rabha (talk) 06:33, 29 June 2023 (UTC)

Hi @Kuldhar Rabha, I granted adminship (expiring in 6 months on 2023-12-30). For the interface adminship, can you please enable 2FA now? It is a requirement according to the policy.  On hold until that happens. Thank you! Martin Urbanec (talk) 15:01, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
2FA is enabled. -Kuldhar Rabha (talk) 16:17, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
Kuldhar Rabha, Done, temporary interface administrator rights are granted, they are to expire together with your regular administrator rights. As these seem to be your first admnistrator and interface administor rights please do not hesitate asking any questions on how something is done if you have any. --Base (talk) 01:17, 1 July 2023 (UTC)

[email protected]

Status:    Done

Requesting for the renewal of sysop and Interface admin for them. Discussion ran for 7 days. Thank you. -- Tumbuka Arch (talk) 08:21, 11 July 2023 (UTC)

 On hold: @CubanoBoi: enable two-factor authentication for the IA right. --Wim b 17:30, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
@Wim b, Can you grant them sysop first so that they activate 2-FA, since the feature is only available to sysops, not regular users. Their rights expired so they can't directly activate 2-FA, unless they belong to 2-FA Tester global group, of which they are not in. Thanks.-- Tumbuka Arch (talk) 14:55, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
@CubanoBoi: I've added 2FA enrollment access for you. — xaosflux Talk 15:45, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
@Xaosflux, @Wim b Referring to this conversation, user looks like activated 2-FA. Tumbuka Arch (talk) 06:17, 15 July 2023 (UTC)
@Xaosflux, actived it CubanoBoi (talk) 12:36, 15 July 2023 (UTC)
Done Granted for 6 months to expire on 2024-01-15. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. — The preceding unsigned comment was added by Wim b (talk) 09:05, 15 July 2023 (UTC)

امین اکبر@skr.wikipedia

Status:    Done

Hi, I need Interface adminship on Saraiki Wikipedia. I have created hundreds of modules and templates but need Interface Adminship to change the interface.--Ameen Akbar (talk) 10:13, 21 July 2023 (UTC)

Hi, Mr Ameen Akbar is very competent and useful for Saraiki Wikipedia in all aspects, I support him.Engr.ismailbhutta (talk) 05:31, 22 July 2023 (UTC)

امین اکبر, this access requires 2FA to be enabled. Please advise when this is completed. --Mykola 14:08, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
I have enabled. Ameen Akbar (talk) 15:09, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
Done Granted for 3 months to expire on 2023-10-26. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. --Mykola 15:18, 26 July 2023 (UTC)

Bureaucrat access

CheckUser access

[email protected]

Status:    Done

Already signed: [1] Durifon (talk) 08:15, 26 July 2023 (UTC)

Oversight access

Removal of access

Kostas20142@global

Status:    Done

Dear Stewards, as you can see here, this user last edited (global) two years ago. According to the policy, his Global Rollback permission should be revoked. Best regards, TenWhile6 (talk | SWMT) 08:25, 2 July 2023 (UTC)

[email protected]

Status:    Done

Local community has voted to remove the administrator access for inactivity. ...Aurora... (talk) 11:40, 2 July 2023 (UTC)

[email protected]

Status:    Done

Local community has voted to remove the administrator access for inactivity. ...Aurora... (talk) 12:16, 2 July 2023 (UTC)

దురుపయోగాల జల్లెడ@teprojects

Status:    Done
Status:    Done
Status:    Done
Status:    Done
Status:    Done

Unused abuse filter account, please remove sysop access. —MdsShakil (talk) 08:08, 3 July 2023 (UTC)

Miscellaneous requests

[email protected]

Status:    Done

Turbojet is a candidate for the role of Good Article nominations reviewer. The required 7 days of discussion have elapsed on June 26. Local policy on ro.wikipedia requires a bureaucrat to close the discussion, but since there are no bureaucrats on this wiki we ask a steward to observe the consensus and close the discussion. Additionally you may refer to this precedent. Thank you. Gikü (talk) 18:11, 27 June 2023 (UTC)

@Gikü to confirm, you are not asking for any specific rights to be added here, you just want a steward judge your local consensus - because your community made a local policy that requires action by a local bureaucrat, but has not installed any bureaucrats? (If so, perhaps you should reconsider your local policy and allow your administrators to do this?) — xaosflux Talk 18:29, 27 June 2023 (UTC)
Yes, that's exactly right. rowiki indeed used to have bureaucrats when rules were instituted.
I am preparing a set of update proposals to those rules, which include your suggestion. I will wait until the pending discussion is finalized in order to not induce confusion. Gikü (talk) 20:17, 27 June 2023 (UTC)
Gikü, Done. but please either change the rule or elect some bureaucrats. :) --Base (talk) 01:37, 1 July 2023 (UTC)

Jon Harald Søby@wikifunctionswiki

Status:    Done

Requesting temporary importer permissions (regular importer, not transwiki importer) for 1 month to help move some pages from Meta to Wikifunctions. Jon Harald Søby (talk) 00:30, 2 August 2023 (UTC)

Jon Harald Søby, Done for 1 month. For the record Jhs's rights were given green light by Wikifunctions staff in the project's Telegram group, given special status of the wiki at the moment that should be enough. --Base (talk) 00:37, 2 August 2023 (UTC)


Requests for removal

[email protected]

Status:    Done

Since I don't have enough time to contribute to the Awadhi Wikipedia, kindly remove my admin rights. 𝙳𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚖𝚁𝚒𝚖𝚖𝚎𝚛 𝚍𝚒𝚜𝚌𝚞𝚜𝚜 10:19, 9 July 2023 (UTC)

 On hold for 1 day, standard for resignation of advanced permissions. --Wim b 15:39, 9 July 2023 (UTC)
Done, although in my opinion you could expect a month for the automatic expiration. --Wim b 10:48, 10 July 2023 (UTC)

Danny B.@skwikiquote

Status:    Not done

I'd like to request the removal of bureaucrat rights for Danny B. (talk · contribs) in multiple projects. He currently holds them for 9 projects despite being utterly inactive or hardly ever active on at least 7 of them (the other 2 - incubator and testwiki I didn't even check). At first sight, he's clearly an active user involved in multiple projects, as he even states on Meta (without updating the info and icons on his userpage despite losing some of the rights he used to possess). However, looking at his edits on each of the projects (seen here, here, here, here, here, here, here and here), it is clearly visible that his edits are robotic and most likely made possible by a script of some kind. It is very important to clarify that I do not request the removal of his sysop, interface-admin, import or any other rights (besides the bureaucrat rights) he may have been granted on any project. His edits are useful and in the vast majority of cases beneficial for the project and the community. The scripts that he is using seem to be well written and are used thoughtfully (despite rare exceptions). Despite that, I have not been able to find a single edit in the last year or two on any of the 7 projects mentioned above that would not appear robotic. It is also important to note that he uses the same robotic scripts for other projects, such as the Slovak Wikipedia (seen here) where he does not hold advanced rights (or holds only some). The last edit on his account not made by a script I was able to find is from 2018 on the Czech Wikipedia (seen here). Not only has he not responded to an e-mail I sent him 2 weeks ago, he also doesn't react to the messages sent to his discussion pages (here, here, here or here). His bureaucrat right has already been taken from him on the Czech Wikinews in 2022 due to his utter inactivity for more than a year in which 3 requests for sysop rights were completely ignored (in 2020, in 2021 and in 2022). While his inactivity (except for the robotic scripts) is apparent in some projects, other ones (such as Slovak Wikibooks or Slovak Wikisource) are so inactive that there are basically no requests for him to even be taken care of. However, on the Slovak Wikiquote, Czech Wikisource and Czech Wikiquote, his long-term inactivity is apparent. Also, it's important to note that he is the only bureaucrat in 4 of the projects (namely cs wikiquote, sk wikiquote, sk wikisource and sk wikibooks). In conclusion, I do not see any point in keeping the bureaucrat rights of the user as the he does not fulfill the only duty resulting from the bureacrat right. I am aware of the fact that you may not be able to revoke the bureaucrat right from the user in projects where no request have been made (sk wikibooks and sk wikisource), however I ask you to consider doing so in the ones where his inactivity can be proven. I am unable to send you any local inactivity rules as there are obviously none for the bureaucrat right and the user hasn't been inactive long enough (officialy, once again only because of the robotic edits) as a sysop for the right to be revoked (and, as mentioned above, I absolutely do not even request that). --V0lkanic (talk) 16:54, 10 July 2023 (UTC)

Question Question: So let's clarify your request: In a nutshell you request removal of the bct rights of the long term active user (on half of the projects you have mentioned pretty much the only active user who apparently for long time keeps those projects alive) because of you have feeling that their edits since 2018 are robotical? Do you have any evidence for your claim which you could provide? — The preceding unsigned comment was added by 90.176.96.41 (talk) 21:53, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
Yes, that is exactly what I am talking about. Just as I've mentioned in the beginning of the text, everything seems fine after checking the user's edit count, sysop actions, periodical activity etc. And it mostly really is, I've already mentioned that the edits are indeed purposeful, in some cases completely unneccessary but certainly not malicious (despite the exception I was able to find mentioned above). However, looking at any of the user's edits in particular (I've already linked everything in the message above), it is clearly visible that the user is able to do up to 20 edits in just 1 minute, with the very same edit summary in each one of them. All of these edits are made at exactly XX:07, mostly in batches of 10 edits (sometimes there is an exception and the batch is executed at XX:37). Furthermore, it is clear that these robotic edits are even used for sysop tasks - such as the deletion of the "Deň:5.február" page I accidentaly created on the sk wikiquote that was deleted together with a batch of other edits on July 6, 2023. The summary used in the deletion was even exactly the same word I used in the reasoning for the deletion request. This way the user seems active even as a sysop, despite the sysop actions clearly being scripted just like the normal edits. How would a user be able to execute exactly 10 edits (sometimes 20), each at exactly XX:07, roughly every other day (at completely random times) on approximately 10 projects. I am asbolutely not able to comprehend how edits like that could be done manually. The inactivity of the user in responding to messages or e-mails despite making these edits on a regular basis may indeed also be a hint to you that the edits are in fact, robotic. V0lkanic (talk) 10:40, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
(non-steward comment) Danny B. is very blatantly using a bot on his own user account but I do wonder whether stewards will be able to act, as he is technically active. IAR should seriously be considered here, as him having crat rights is actually a negative to the project, preventing users from being given sysop and preventing the project from being improved/maintained. --Ferien (talk) 17:08, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
V0lkanic, I feel your sentiment, but I think it won't be surprising to you that this is Not done. Unless there is an emergency we cannot be stripping people off their permissions. Please start a local discussion for each of the wikis and come back with the results of those. There are no requirements on how big those discussions have to be, in fact if only few people show up that is only an additional argument pro your cause as under current practices, documented at MVR we would not give bureaucrat rights at all in such circumstances. That said please also make sure that the discussions are places at the proper places in the wikis and announced there properly. Each individual wiki's bot policy and whether people are allowed to run bots from their own account is also a matter for a local discussion. For example on Wikimedia Commons and Wikidata people routinely launch scripts that make sometimes tens of thousands actions in one run from their own account (Cat-a-lot, VFC, Mix-n-Match, etc), while on other wikis that is a way to get banned almost instantly, it is all up to the local policy or established practice on that. --Base (talk) 14:06, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
With Cat-a-lot, you are at least having to press some buttons which shows you are actually around on-wiki. With this script, it appears Danny B. just sets it up and leaves it running for days/weeks/months; you don't get that with any other form of (semi-)automated editing. Were it not for these bot edits, Danny B. would be desysopped by now. It is giving the impression that he has been around, when he has not responded to bureaucrat requests for years. Disappointing that IAR doesn't apply to users gaming the system with community-given rights but globally locking people clearly not within the scope of a global lock is all good. --Ferien (talk) 14:59, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
I agree with you and if I were a local community member I would vote for their rights to be removed basing on what you say. But that is exactly why one should start such a vote to let people have a say (or to demonstrate that there is no local community besides you there). IAR is a very thin line to tread, and there is no reason to apply it now when the normal rights removal process is so straightforward. --Base (talk) 15:21, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Base, As you've stated, it isn't neccessarily surprising to me that the request couldn't be accepted, but I'm at least glad I was able to point out to a, from my point of view, potentially serious problem occuring in (mostly small or nearly non-existent) wiki communities. Sincerely, I'd like to continue the talk on your talk page as I have one more question and I certainly don't want to flood this page that is suitable for requests. I also want to thank Ferien for stating his point of view. --V0lkanic (talk) 17:31, 14 July 2023 (UTC)

Styyx@global

Status:    Done

Please remove my global sysop and global rollback rights. Thanks. Styyx (talk) 14:25, 11 July 2023 (UTC)

Standard 24-hour hold for resignation of advanced permissions. — xaosflux Talk 14:36, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
D: ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 20:53, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
Done. Thank to your service, Styyx. Martin Urbanec, FYI for list. --Mykola 14:28, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
I don't see them in the list, maybe it was already handled by a fellow list admin? Martin Urbanec (talk) 15:05, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Thank you for your service, sad to see you go :( --Ferien (talk) 16:49, 12 July 2023 (UTC)

[email protected]

Status:    Done

(opmerkingen) Japiot (talk) 22:48, 15 July 2023 (UTC)

 On hold for 1 day, standard for resignation of advanced permissions. --Mykola 23:00, 15 July 2023 (UTC)
Done. --Mykola 23:52, 16 July 2023 (UTC)

-akko@global

Status:    Done

Hello! As you can see [2], this user last edited (global) two years ago. According to the policy, his Global Rollback permission should be revoked. Thanks! AlPaD (talk) 06:45, 16 July 2023 (UTC)

Stanglavine@global

Status:    Done

Hi! Please, remove my steward flag. Since several months, I'm not being active at the level our community need from our stewards. I'll continue around, editing and working in diferent areas, but this flag is not necessary to me at this moment. Thank you :) stanglavine msg 19:16, 20 July 2023 (UTC)

 On hold for one day, per standard procedure. Thank you for your service and I hope to see you around! Cheers, Hoo man (talk) 19:24, 20 July 2023 (UTC)
Done. Thanks for your work, Stanglavine. --Mykola 19:16, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Thanks for you work Stanglavine! --Alaa :)..! 19:44, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
@Hoo man, Mykola7, and علاء: Thank you, see you around :D stanglavine msg 19:44, 25 July 2023 (UTC)

[email protected]

Status:    Done

Inactive administrator and bureaucrat, according to Esperanto Wikipedia rules.--Fenikals (talk) 14:25, 22 July 2023 (UTC)

Chuck [email protected]

Status:    Done

Inactive administrator, according to Esperanto Wikipedia rules.--Fenikals (talk) 14:25, 22 July 2023 (UTC)

[email protected]

Status:    Done

Inactive bot-administrator, according to Esperanto Wikipedia rules.--Fenikals (talk) 14:05, 22 July 2023 (UTC)

[email protected]

Status:    Done

The longtime bureaucrat and administrator Itti has aborted her re-election and wants to retire from all advanced dewiki-rights. Administrator rights are already removed by our remaining bureaucrats, but the bureaucrat flag must be removed by a steward. Thank you for your work, Itti. --TenWhile6 (talk | SWMT) 12:59, 24 July 2023 (UTC)

[email protected]

Status:    Done

Reason this etc. Ellywa (talk) 13:53, 25 July 2023 (UTC)

 On hold for 1 day, standard for resignation of advanced permissions. --Mykola 13:56, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
Done. --Wim b 13:27, 26 July 2023 (UTC)

Abuse filter@kabwiki

Status:    Done

Old abuse filter account, current account is "Filtre anti-abus". Please remove sysop. * Pppery * it has begun 03:54, 26 July 2023 (UTC)

Marc [email protected]

Status:    Done

The French Wikipedia has a policy of six-month terms for CheckUsers, and the Nominations Committee announced that Marc's access was not being renewed. Sdrqaz (talk) 09:09, 26 July 2023 (UTC)

[email protected]

Status:    Done

Inactive administrator, according to Esperanto Wikipedia rules.--Fenikals (talk) 14:34, 26 July 2023 (UTC)

Abuse [email protected]

Status:    Done

Old abuse filter account, correct account is "Filtre de misusa". Please remove sysop. * Pppery * it has begun 21:15, 26 July 2023 (UTC)

Done — xaosflux Talk 17:32, 31 July 2023 (UTC)

Filtre antiabus @ln.wiktionary

Status:    Done

Old abuse filter account, correct account is "Filtre anti-abus". Please remove sysop. * Pppery * it has begun 21:15, 26 July 2023 (UTC)

Done — xaosflux Talk 17:33, 31 July 2023 (UTC)

အလွဲသုံးစားမှု စိစစ်စနစ်@mnw.wiktionary

Status:    Done

Old abuse filter account, correct account is "နဲစၟဳစၟတ်မရပ်စပ်ဆဆဵု". Please remove sysop. * Pppery * it has begun 21:15, 26 July 2023 (UTC)

There really is no reason these need to be cleaned up, they are all "system accounts" - is there an issue @Pppery ? — xaosflux Talk 21:58, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
I filed these primarily because I saw other people do so successfully in the archives. (Steward requests/Permissions/2023-07#దురుపయోగాల జల్లెడ@teprojects, Steward requests/Permissions/2023-06#Abuse [email protected], Steward requests/Permissions/2023-06#Suisteʼmollar [email protected], Steward requests/Permissions/2023-05#Filtre antiabus@bmwiki, etc.), so assumed it was something that people agreed should be done. I was looking at the admin lists of these specific wikis as a follow-up to SRM#Fix main page on various wikis to determine whether that request could be handled there (it could) or needed to be done locally. * Pppery * it has begun 22:03, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
Now these accounts have been sent here, it'd be much better to just fulfill the requests rather than questioning them. If there was, for example, an account called "Edit filter2" that was a system account on enwiki, but was no longer used in favour of "Edit filter", I'd imagine it would definitely be desysopped because it gives an incorrect impression of the number of sysops on a wiki. I see no reason why we shouldn't do the same for smaller wikis. --Ferien (talk) 12:43, 27 July 2023 (UTC)
Done — xaosflux Talk 17:33, 31 July 2023 (UTC)

Temporary permissions (expired and rejected requests only)

Retrieved from "https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Steward_requests/Permissions/2023-07&oldid=25501953"