Jump to content

Steward requests/Permissions/2022-06

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki

Administrator access

Wolverène@biwikipedia

Hello. Please provide me temporary administrator rights on the Bislama Wikipedia, again. I'm ready to be one who works against the vandalism/spam/nonsense pages. More info is in the local discussion (see above). Thank you in advance. --Wolverène (talk) 10:34, 27 May 2022 (UTC)

Wolverène, please start a new vote, the one from October cannot be reused. Thanks! Base (talk) 10:56, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
Hello Base! I've started the new vote yesterday, of course it's different from the October one. It's currently at the bottom of the local Village Pump page. --Wolverène (talk) 09:33, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
Hey @Wolverène, thanks for clarifying. I believe it's the signature what confused us – the vote was added yesterday, but with a signature from October 2021 . I've fixed the signature.
This is now  On hold until 2022-06-03, as a RfA needs to be up for at least 7 days. Best wishes, Martin Urbanec (talk) 09:50, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
Done Granted for 1 year to expire on 2023-06-04. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. -- Amanda (she/her) 01:01, 4 June 2022 (UTC)

Caro de [email protected]

Hello, the Novial Wikipedia is a very small one with just me and another casual user writing there. I would like to be an administrator for a month or so to just to a clean up there. Thanks. --Caro de Segeda (talk) 10:51, 30 May 2022 (UTC)

Hello @Caro de Segeda, thanks for the interest! Can you please start a thread about your request at nov.wikipedia, at some highly-visible page (village pump, administrator's noticeboard, dedicated page for request for permissions or similar), to serve as your request for adminship (RfA)? Once you start the thread, please link it here.
To explain: A (local) RfA needs to be started on the project for someone to become an admin, even if the project is very small. This is to allow any wikimedians to speak up about the RfA and support/oppose, in case they wish to do so. If there won't be any comments under the RfA, that's fine – as long as there are no opposes, it will (likely) result in (temporary) adminship granted. More information about the way how stewards evaluate RfAs can be found at MVR.
If you have any questions about the process, feel free to ask here – we'll be happy to help. Best wishes, Martin Urbanec (talk) 11:56, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Done, thanks for the explanation. Caro de Segeda (talk) 11:59, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Thanks! This is now  On hold until 2022-06-06 (7 days from now). Martin Urbanec (talk) 12:01, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Sorry but for how many days is it going to be on hold? Caro de Segeda (talk) 09:07, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
Done Granted for 6 months to expire on 2022-12-06. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. — regards, Revi 23:01, 6 June 2022 (UTC)

ᱫᱚᱞᱚᱱ ᱯᱨᱳᱵᱟᱥ@Satwikipedia

Hello. Please provide me access Permanently administrator rights on the Santali Wikipedia. I'm ready to be one who works against the vandalism/spam/nonsense pages and protected the page this wiki. More info is in the local discussion (see above). Thank you in advance. ᱫᱚᱞᱚᱱ ᱯᱨᱳᱵᱟᱥ (talk) 21:05, 3 June 2022 (UTC)

You have provided no link to a discussion. -- Amanda (she/her) 00:59, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
The link you provided is to the main page. You need to have a local discussion in the wiki where the community can show support or opposition to your application. -- Amanda (she/her) 05:17, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
It can't be done on your user talkpage, it needs to be done on a place like the community portal and it has to last for 7 days. -- Amanda (she/her) 05:45, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
The user registered just four days ago [1] -- Johannnes89 (talk) 07:12, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
They also faked lots of permissions on en:User:ᱫᱚᱞᱚᱱ ᱯᱨᱳᱵᱟᱥ. -- Jeff G. ツ (please ping or talk to me) 11:21, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
Not done -- Amanda (she/her) 01:35, 7 June 2022 (UTC)

NGC 54@rowikiquote

--NGC 54 (talkcontribs) 11:00, 8 June 2022 (UTC)

Done Granted for 3 months to expire on 2022-09-09. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. -- Amanda (she/her) 04:36, 9 June 2022 (UTC)

Aishik Rehman@bnwiktionary

-- Aishik Rehman (talk) 09:49, 10 June 2022 (UTC)

Extended for 6 months until December 11, 2022. —MarcoAurelio (talk) 10:54, 11 June 2022 (UTC)

Reptilien.19831209BE1@wawiktionary

Renewal for the third time of my administrator access and interface administrator access. No objection since the 3 of june. — The preceding unsigned comment was added by Reptilien.19831209BE1 (talk)

Done Granted for 1 year to expire on 2023-06-11. —MarcoAurelio (talk) 11:01, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
Thank you MarcoAurelio Reptilien.19831209BE1 (talk) 13:55, 11 June 2022 (UTC)

Yahya@bnwikivoyage

Please grant me sysop and interface administrator access. This is my third renewal. I mentioned in my request to grant the accesses permanently. Thanks. —Yahya (talkcontribs.) 06:33, 13 June 2022 (UTC)

Done Granted for 1 year to expire on 2023-06-13. —MarcoAurelio (talk) 08:35, 13 June 2022 (UTC)

अजीत कुमार तिवारी@hiwikiversity

I am requesting for administrator access again as it expired today. Thanks. --अजीत कुमार तिवारी (talk) 17:01, 13 June 2022 (UTC)

Done Granted for 1 year to expire on 2023-06-14. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. --Sotiale (talk) 10:30, 14 June 2022 (UTC)

HoMen@hywWikipedia

Hi, could you please grant administrator access HoMen to hyw.wikipedia. Since 2017 she has been helping the platform with her edits and article creation and has also been a guide in her country's wiki community.

I fully endorse that her administrator access will help Wiki ameliorate․ Thanks! --Azniv Stepanian (talk) 10:13, 14 June 2022 (UTC)

What about a copyright block on Commons? As administrator she will need to have a basic understanding of the copyright. Ruslik (talk) 20:34, 14 June 2022 (UTC)

Dear Ruslik,

We would like to point out that the Wiki Commons guidelines were close to nonexistent when Western Armenian Wiki was jumpstarted, therefore some of the rules and regulations around it were unclear for some users. This has changed over the years and her Commons block should not be posing as any type of threat for HoMen's potential adminship. I and the rest of the Western Armenian Wiki community are confident that she no longer will be working in a way that goes against the Commons guidelines and have come to fully trust her. Please let us know if we can be of any help in regards to this matter.--Azniv Stepanian (talk) 17:13, 15 June 2022 (UTC)

Done Ruslik (talk) 20:54, 15 June 2022 (UTC)

TVA ARUN@ta.wikisource

I am contributing Tamil wikisource since 11 May 2017 (SUL). Our community is the top proofreading community among Indic community. If i have a sysop right, that will be good for the clean up pages and other progress. I am also doing outreach in colleges. e.g., c:File:Tamil Wikisource workshop SHASUN 2.jpg. I am already coordinating our existing sysops. --TVA ARUN (talk) 06:26, 15 June 2022 (UTC)

Done Ruslik (talk) 20:52, 15 June 2022 (UTC)

CX Zoom@piwikipedia

Requesting adminship to avoid automatic expiry. Request at local page has been open for 7 days and is properly advertised on Village pump, Noticeboard, Main page's talk via automatic header notice. —‍CX Zoom (A/अ/অ) (let's talk|contribs) 19:57, 14 June 2022 (UTC)

Done Granted for 6 months to expire on 2022-12-16. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. Ruslik (talk) 20:05, 16 June 2022 (UTC)

Hehua@zhwikivoyage

The vote has ended. 5 votes in support, no one is neutral or opposed. Thank you. Hehua (talk) 12:00, 15 June 2022 (UTC)

Done Granted for 6 months to expire on 2022-12-16. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. Ruslik (talk) 20:07, 16 June 2022 (UTC)

[email protected]

Per voting. Konno Yumeto 12:52, 15 June 2022 (UTC)

Done Granted for 2 years to expire on 2024-06-17. Ruslik (talk) 20:36, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
@Ruslik0: Seems you forgot to grant permission? Stang 21:25, 17 June 2022 (UTC)

Done now --Alaa :)..! 12:13, 18 June 2022 (UTC)

[email protected]

Per voting. Konno Yumeto 12:52, 15 June 2022 (UTC)

Done Granted for 1 year to expire on 2023-06-18. Ruslik (talk) 21:01, 18 June 2022 (UTC)

Ericliu1912@zhwikivoyage

The vote has ended. 4 votes in support, no one is neutral or opposed. Thank you. Hehua (talk) 06:55, 16 June 2022 (UTC)

Done Granted for 6 months to expire on 2022-12-18. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. Ruslik (talk) 20:54, 18 June 2022 (UTC)

Homo [email protected]

Hi, I'd like to have my sysop rights on Lithuanian Wikisource extended. Homo ergaster (talk) 08:43, 17 June 2022 (UTC)

Done Granted for 1 year to expire on 2023-06-18. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. —Thanks for the fish! talkcontrib (he/him) 22:10, 18 June 2022 (UTC)

Marwan Mohamad@gorwikipedia

Hello. This request is for permanent Administrator access and permanent Interface Administrator access. 2FA tester permissions is here. Ezagren (talk) 05:32, 18 June 2022 (UTC)

Unfortunately, gorwiki is too small for permanent flags, so I've Done Granted for 1 year to expire on 2023-06-18. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. Best, —Thanks for the fish! talkcontrib (he/him) 22:34, 18 June 2022 (UTC) (Not actually done —Thanks for the fish! talkcontrib (he/him) 16:56, 22 June 2022 (UTC))
I've now actually Done Granted for 2 years to expire on 2024-06-22. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. Best, —Thanks for the fish! talkcontrib (he/him) 16:56, 22 June 2022 (UTC)

[email protected]

Hello, Korean Wikinews Administrator re-election is underway, I leave a request for reappointment because there is no opposition in the election for about a month. I look forward to your kind cooperation. --Trainholic (talk) 19:20, 24 June 2022 (UTC)

Done Granted for 1 year to expire on 2023-06-24. Ruslik (talk) 20:45, 24 June 2022 (UTC)

Rebel Agent@tnwikipedia

(Thanks) Rebel Agent (talk) 09:14, 23 June 2022 (UTC)

@Rebel Agent nothing has changed since last time you asked for admin rights [3][4][5] -- Johannnes89 (talk) 09:19, 23 June 2022 (UTC)

Johannnes89 When you say “nothing has changed" I don't understand what you actually mean, do you mean I have to create a discussion first or I have to make a little more edits on the wiki first ? Please tell me what you actually mean when you say nothing has changed . Thanks Rebel Agent (talk) 12:34, 23 June 2022 (UTC)

@Base already said: you will need to create a discussion about it on Setswana Wikipedia. -- Johannnes89 (talk) 12:40, 23 June 2022 (UTC)

Johannnes89 Ooh Okay thanks have a nice day. Rebel Agent (talk) 12:50, 23 June 2022 (UTC)

Not done No RfA/appointment discussion, no permissions. --Martin Urbanec (talk) 17:44, 25 June 2022 (UTC)

Several users@smnwiki

A vote was started on June 3rd about who should be the administrators on the Inari Sámi Wikipedia (smnwiki), which resulted in the following five users being elected:

--Muotâ (talk) 13:00, 26 June 2022 (UTC)

Done Granted for 1 year to expire on 2023-07-26. --Martin Urbanec (talk) 18:36, 26 June 2022 (UTC)

Caro de Segeda@tpiwikipedia

Hello, the Tok Pisin Wikipedia is a very small one with just me writing there. I would like to be an administrator for a week or a month to just do some clean up there. Thanks. --Caro de Segeda (talk) 13:34, 20 June 2022 (UTC)

 On hold until 27 June 2022 Ruslik (talk) 20:33, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
Done Granted for 3 months to expire on 2022-09-29. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. Ruslik (talk) 03:34, 29 June 2022 (UTC)

CiphriusKane@scowikipedia

CiphriusKane (talk) 19:21, 26 June 2022 (UTC)

Done Granted for 1 year to expire on 2023-06-29. Ruslik (talk) 03:36, 29 June 2022 (UTC)

[email protected]

We need a final decision, here. --Erokhin (talk) 08:10, 27 June 2022 (UTC)

Done Granted for 3 months to expire on 2022-09-29. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. — regards, Revi 15:16, 29 June 2022 (UTC)

QueerEcofeministBot@mrwikisource

My bot needs admin rights in order to make mass protections, moves, deletions of wrongly done ocr's pages. Do these things and not to flood recent changes. As we do not have flooder rights, So I am asking admin rights for my bot. I will be using JWB thanks QueerEcofeminist [they/them/their] 05:58, 29 June 2022 (UTC)

Granted for a week. We generally do not grant bots sysop permission for a long period. — regards, Revi 15:12, 29 June 2022 (UTC)

Lookruk@lowikipedia

Hello, the Lao Wikipedia is a very small. There are 1 sysop. But they not active. And I will have to use administrative tools to improve many parts and clean up this wiki. Thanks. Lookruk (talk) 08:55, 28 June 2022 (UTC)

@Lookruk I'm not an Admin here but I think you should be active at Lao Wikipedia contribute for some time then you can think of becoming an Admin. Thanks Rebel Agent (talk) 11:17, 28 June 2022 (UTC)

Discussion is required; We will not be granting adminship without a discussion link. On hold pending discussion (and 7 days since the post). — regards, Revi 15:06, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
the user has zero edits in loWP [6], quite unlikely that such a discussion is going to happen. -- Johannnes89 (talk) 15:31, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
@-revi Please cancel this request. Thanks. --Lookruk (talk) 12:57, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Marked as withdrawn. --Martin Urbanec (talk) 12:59, 30 June 2022 (UTC)

Interface administrator access

Galessandroni@itwikiversity

As per discussion, please check the 2FA and grant the IA flag until the sysop flag expires (on 22 August 2022 at 09:58 UTC), thanks Superpes15 (talk) 09:56, 3 June 2022 (UTC)

Done Granted for 3 months to expire on 2022-08-22. Ruslik (talk) 20:15, 3 June 2022 (UTC)

Leofbrj@itwikiversity

As above, please check the 2FA and grant the IA flag until the sysop flag expires (on 4 May 2024 at 07:58 UTC), thanks Superpes15 (talk) 09:56, 3 June 2022 (UTC)

Done as requested. -- Amanda (she/her) 01:06, 4 June 2022 (UTC)

[email protected]

Per voting. Konno Yumeto 12:52, 15 June 2022 (UTC)

Done Granted for 2 years to expire on 2024-06-17. Ruslik (talk) 20:36, 17 June 2022 (UTC)

[email protected]

Per voting. Konno Yumeto 12:52, 15 June 2022 (UTC)

Done Granted for 2 years to expire on 2024-06-17. Ruslik (talk) 20:36, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
@Ruslik0 and علاء: The permission was forgot to grant. Konno Yumeto 15:01, 18 June 2022 (UTC)

Done --Alaa :)..! 15:09, 18 June 2022 (UTC)

Marwan Mohamad@gorwikipedia

Hello. This request is for permanent Administrator access and permanent Interface Administrator access. 2FA tester permissions is here. Ezagren (talk) 05:32, 18 June 2022 (UTC)

Copied to IA too. —Thanks for the fish! talkcontrib (he/him) 22:34, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
@Marwan Mohamad: I've granted you sysop, so you should be able to activate 2FA at gorwiki, please let me know when you do so. Best, —Thanks for the fish! talkcontrib (he/him) 22:34, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
@Tks4Fish: Just wanted to clarify: based on his CA, he doesn't have sysop right on any wiki. Could you please confirm? Thank you. ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · 10:37, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
@Rachmat04: yeah, I did a dumb. I thought I had granted them +sysop before my computer crashed, looked at the log, saw me granting it, but didn't realize it was in 2020. I'll do that now. Thanks for letting me know! —Thanks for the fish! talkcontrib (he/him) 16:53, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
@Marwan Mohamad: repinging you now that I've actually granted you +sysop. Please let me know once you enable 2FA! Best, —Thanks for the fish! talkcontrib (he/him) 16:57, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
@Tks4Fish: I've enabled 2FA. Sorry for the late reply, I work at sea/ship and don't connect to the internet every day. I'm bothered if at any time I have to renew the active period of the admin, please give me permanent admin rights. Thanks, Marwan Mohamad (talk) 23:50, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
  • discussion: check
  • 2FA: check
Granted to sync with adminship. — regards, Revi 12:06, 23 June 2022 (UTC)

SM7@bhwikipedia

My interface admin rights expired on 28 May. I started discussion on 1 May but being very low user activity no response received. Request to extend these rights for One year. --SM7--talk-- 16:13, 21 June 2022 (UTC)

Done Granted for 1 year to expire on 2023-06-23. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. Best, —Thanks for the fish! talkcontrib (he/him) 13:49, 23 June 2022 (UTC)

Bureaucrat access

CheckUser access

דגש@hewikipedia

Hello, According to the results of the vote in the local project, I will apply for a CheckUser permission on the Hebrew Wikipedia. Voting link: w:he:ויקיפדיה:בודק/בחירת בודקים - 26. A confidentiality agreement was signed in the phabrikator. thanks, דגש (talk) 06:45, 31 May 2022 (UTC)

 On hold pending on the candidate's signature of the confidentiality agreement for nonpublic information (see instructions) and Wikimedia Foundation confirmation of the same --Martin Urbanec (talk) 09:46, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
@Martin Urbanec: I signed before writing here. What do you mean? דגש (talk) 13:03, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
@דגש: Your signature of the confidentiality agreement for nonpublic information has to be confirmed by the Trust and Safety team of the Wikimedia Foundation before the CU-permission can be assigned. Given you indicate you signed the document, the signature should be published soon on this page. Daniuu (talk) 13:10, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
As @Daniuu says. Your signature on the document was not yet acknowledged by the WMF Office. From a stewards' perspective, it's impossible to tell apart "did sign, but signature was not yet acknowledged" and "did not sign at all". Sorry for confusing you! (Perhaps we should add a sentence about that into the standard "NDA-only permission req on hold" message?). Best, Martin Urbanec (talk) 14:32, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
@Martin Urbanec: I think it's worth adding to a sentence format like this: "If you have already signed the agreement, permission will be given after the signature check by the Wikimedia team. The signature check will be documented on the page Access to nonpublic personal data policy/Noticeboard". דגש (talk) 07:23, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
Done -- Amanda (she/her) 20:50, 3 June 2022 (UTC)

Elph@arwikipedia

I'll put this request "onhold" based on @RadiX: and @Trijnstel: comments on 2017-12. I'll open a discussion on steward-l. Best --Alaa :)..! 14:21, 24 May 2022 (UTC)

Not done The consensus is that a new election is required for this user to regain their checkuser permissions. -- Amanda (she/her) 20:47, 3 June 2022 (UTC)

Minorax@metawiki

Please grant Minorax checkuser rights at Meta-Wiki following the successful application linked above. Thank you, —MarcoAurelio (talk) 09:35, 5 June 2022 (UTC)

Done but ping @RadiX and Krd: for the mailing list and wiki. -- Amanda (she/her) 20:00, 5 June 2022 (UTC)

Oversight access

Removal of access

Aldnonymous@global

Aldnonymous has been inactive since April 4 2020. Per policy, his global rollback flag shall be removed. Thanks for his service. NguoiDungKhongDinhDanh 20:49, 31 May 2022 (UTC)

Done Sad to see this. Feel free to re-request it once you are back :) --BRP ever 04:18, 1 June 2022 (UTC)

SimmeD@metawiki

The user made their last rename more than a year ago at 14:15, 31 May 2021 (UTC), as per the policy, their global renamer rights should be removed. Thanks! -- CptViraj (talk) 04:01, 1 June 2022 (UTC)

Done -- Amanda (she/her) 06:51, 1 June 2022 (UTC)

SilkTork@metawiki

The user made their last rename more than a year ago at 10:36, 18 May 2021 (UTC), as per the policy, their global renamer rights should be removed. Thanks! -- CptViraj (talk) 07:12, 20 May 2022 (UTC)

Done @Trijnstel: for the mailing list. -- Amanda (she/her) 14:41, 20 May 2022 (UTC)
I also sent an email to the global renamers list admins a week ago; no reply yet, and I don't know if they handled this already. —MarcoAurelio (talk) 13:03, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
Gonna go ahead and mark this fully done since the list admins have been notified. -- Amanda (she/her) 04:08, 2 June 2022 (UTC)

MoiraMoira@global

MoiraMoira has been inactive since 29 May 2020. Per policy, her global rollback flag shall be removed. Thanks for her service. NguoiDungKhongDinhDanh 23:27, 1 June 2022 (UTC)

Steward requests/Global permissions, no? דגש (talk) 23:36, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
@דגש: No, because SRGP is only for applications and not removals. NguoiDungKhongDinhDanh 23:38, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
Done --Martin Urbanec (talk) 12:47, 2 June 2022 (UTC)

Zhuyifei1999@zhwikivoyage

Please remove my admin and interface admin. I don't see myself returning to contribute actively to Wikimedia any time soon. I just received inactivity notice too so that's that. --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 10:26, 2 June 2022 (UTC)

 On hold for 1 day, standard for resignation of advanced permissions --Martin Urbanec (talk) 12:48, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
Done @Zhuyifei1999: thanks for your services. stanglavine msg 14:55, 3 June 2022 (UTC)

[email protected]

— The preceding unsigned comment was added by Jphwra (talk) 19:38, 29 May 2022 (UTC)

Just to give some context in case it is confusing what the linked discussion is, this is basically a resignation request but it follows the request to bureaucrats where it was discussed whether the user should lose the admin rights as arguably he might have violated the terms of limited adminship that he was granted. Base (talk) 13:39, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Actually, I have these rights until June 12. So stewards decide whether it makes sense to deprive in advance or not. In my opinion, the seizure through which I filed this application violates the rights granted to me by bureaucrats. I deleted the category I created incorrectly in my own article. I thought it was a perfectly normal edit not to distract administrators. Formally, my removal of the category was a violation of the terms of granting me administrator rights. Therefore, it is the stewards who must indicate whether it is a violation to remove an incorrectly created category or not. Thank you. --Jphwra (talk) 14:47, 30 May 2022 (UTC)

Let me offer some clarification as a UkWiki bureaucrat who granted admin rights Jphwra.

Amidst Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, the Ukrainian community has been experiencing reduced community capabilities to fight vandalism and fulfill other maintenance duties, so we’ve adopted the practice of granting temporary adminship for a brief period of time.

Jphwra was granted temporary adminship with strict limitation to use admin rights only for removing obvious vandalism (while Jphwra is an experienced user and former admin, he’d been involved in some rule violations like edit wars in the past, hence the limitation; Jphwra suggested this arrangement himself).

Formally, Jphwra broke the scope of his limited adminship and performed a deletion of the page that hadn’t been vandalized. While the admin action in question isn’t incorrect itself, it does formally violate the scope of Jphwra’s adminship and thus admin rights should be removed per the initial terms. --Aced (talk) 12:51, 31 May 2022 (UTC)

In fact, it was a petty act, the removal of an erroneously created category. I do not think this is a sufficient reason for deprivation of rights. --Yakudza (talk) 13:55, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
Agree with User:Aced --YarikUkraine (talk) 16:11, 31 May 2022 (UTC)

@Jphwra: Are you submitting this as a resignation or not? -- Amanda (she/her) 20:53, 3 June 2022 (UTC)

NO more. Mine expires on June 12, so revoke those rights on June 12. I need this to prove that I keep my word as a user with an experience for which the main article is not the status. Thank you. Jphwra (talk) 20:57, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
"While the admin action in question isn’t incorrect itself, it does formally violate the scope of Jphwra’s adminship and thus admin rights should be removed per the initial terms" (Aced). --YarikUkraine (talk) 21:49, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
@AmandaNP:, Permissions should be revoked not of his own desire, but without discussion, Jphwra has violated the terms of which he undertook to comply with in the case of granting him permissions. These conditions were violated by him twice on May 29. Therefore, sysop permissons should be removed without discussion, this was written by bureaucrat Aced and confirmed by bureaucrat YarikUkraine. Can you remove them, or do such conditions not affect it? I will also note that the rights were granted with the support of the community, which was less than 40%. --Mykola talk 22:46, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
This is not an easy case. Normally we do require a full community consensus to remove the rights of a user. These are exceptional circumstances though where a user had conditions placed on their adminship with the consensus of bureaucrats seemingly, and it was directly logged also. Therefore I will go ahead and complete the removal and mark this as Done. I do suggest though that the community have a further discussion about the rules, circumstances and formal processes for removal. -- Amanda (she/her) 00:57, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
Thank you. Jphwra (talk) 04:48, 4 June 2022 (UTC)

Zhxy 519@zhwikisource

I request the suspension of administrator access of User:Zhxy 519 until the desysop process for User:Zhxy 519 on zhwikisource ends. Reason: He blocks another administrator User:Jusjih on zhwikisource for submitting a formal desysop request of User:Zhxy 519 himself following the desysop process. This is absolutely unacceptable behaviour for an administrator on a small wiki. Midleading (talk) 10:42, 28 April 2022 (UTC)

Collapsing extended discussion: Stewards are aware of this and discussing this on stewards-l. — regards, Revi 19:02, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
Please see Requests for comment/Global de-adminship for Jusjih,and Midleading is suspicious for ignoring discussions and covering Jusjih. Jusjih is blocked in zhws due to the rule: deliberately abusing de-adminship votes. And according to the same rule, Midleading cannot come to ask for urgent suspension without community or sysop consensus.--Zhxy 519 (talk) 13:07, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
I wonder who could judge what is "deliberately abusing de-adminship votes"?--Cmsth11126a02 (talk) 14:01, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Similar question: Even if there is a previous sysop consensus (or to call a judge) on "communication failure" but still Midleading is not coming out to stop Jusjih. So why judge does not do their job? Zhxy 519 (talk) 14:26, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
There is evidence that the community may consider actions of Zhxy 519 inappropriate, for example, other users from zhwikisource community are coming here to question Zhxy 519 and undo his blanking of desysop request. So there is a clear need to proceed the desysop process, but Zhxy 519 is threatening the free speech of the community. Remark that he did not start his de-adminship request of Jusjih through the process in zhwikisource. --Midleading (talk) 14:44, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
I give all reasons here in s:zh:Wikisource:写字间#可不可能向二位固執用戶溝通 for what I have done and contacted all involved including you. I never blocked you all for just discussing and you can still refute me, even now ongoing. You are exaggerating and just failed to give reasonable responses. Zhxy 519 (talk) 14:56, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
FYI: The block log of Jusjih. SCP-2000 14:04, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Oh my, Chinese Wikisource certainly has the worst relationship between administrators that I've ever seen. Almost every active administrators on zhwikisource are into the local dispute. I recommend stewards think very carefully before acting. —— Eric LiuTalk 21:39, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Zhxy 519 has been resisting the reform of RFDA process for almost a year since last RFDA. Zhxy 519 casted doubt on the plan proposed by Jusjih and demanded further discussion (See contributions of Zhxy 519, he have been doing almost nothing else during this time). I have been trying to maintain a neutral position. As the administrators are accusing each other, I try to seek input from other users of zhws through discussions and voting (Zhxy 519 have stopped every votes proposed by Jusjih immediately). From my experience, Zhxy 519 seems to have lost trust by zhws community, but I need to confirm that through voting on zhws. However his most recent action of blocking Jusjih and blanking the RFDA page is plainly unacceptable. It makes uninvolved administrator who undos his actions looks like involved (steward, you will look like having been involved as well, but we need your power), paralysing the zhws community. The actions of Zhxy 519 violated the policy on zhws as the minimum requirement of speedy termination of RFDA is not satisfied. I can't think of a reason this should be allowed. Zhxy 519 now probably wants to continue this discussion on meta, where many users of zhws cannot participate and potential participants don't know what have been happening on zhws, due to language barriers. Zhxy 519 accuses many active editors on zhws to be members of "an underground group" in Requests for comment/Global de-adminship for Jusjih. This is totally unfounded. If they leave zhws (some participants of last RFDA request had already left), the community of zhws will be much weaker than now. — The preceding unsigned comment was added by User:Midleading (talk)
Oh, it was your responsibility to stop Jusjih's manipulation since you were one of the sysops agreed on last consensus, where were you? I can show you my contributions on zhws in the discussion, how could you lie here? While most time discussion has proved Jusjih's abuses, you are still pushing voting, why don't you come out to say something? The consensus requested by stewards has proved you are wrong. I never said they are underground group, stop lying. And lastly, when Jusjih trying to de-admin 2 sysops at the same time, I didn't see you come out to say "the community of zhws will be much weaker", but when the problematic users are just mentioned, you want keep them to "save the community", interesting.--Zhxy 519 (talk) 23:25, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
That consensus was last year. Since then much have changed. A new policy of RFDA is adopted, and most recently Zhxy 519 blocked Jusjih. Could you please let other people speak by keeping the RFDA page open and unblock Jusjih, please?--Midleading (talk) 01:01, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
You can speak, and Jusjih can speak as well. If they can prove their innocence, of course they have no reason to be blocked. We can refute each other, if only we are reasonable. Zhxy 519 (talk) 01:26, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
And last year? Jusjih didn't change their way of abuse in this year, and consensus faced no challenge on zhws and not a harmful one, why shouldn't it be followed?--Zhxy 519 (talk) 01:30, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
We need to talk in an equal, open and formal process defined by the policy recently adopted by zhws community, not in an atomsphere where the formal request is blanked by you and proposer is blocked by you. And we need to invite not only administrators but also community members of zhws to discuss the matter on that formal RFDA request, and decide on a resolution which is accepted by both administrators and community members. I'm not requesting to remove your administrator access permenantly without community consensus here, I'm just taking necessary steps to ensure a dialogue among administrators and community members can happen. This is not overriding it with a consensus among administrators last year, nor forcing people to speak on their user talk page while they are blocked without the ability to reach a consensus with each other through the RFDA process. If you can understand this is important, undo your recent actions and let the RFDA process resume until it concludes or meets the minimum requirement of speedy termination, there is no need to suspend your administrator access now. Otherwise I need to request the steward to suspend your administrator access so that you won't be able to abuse the right to block other people. --Midleading (talk) 02:16, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
You know what, you are threatening under the eyes of stewards. You are equal to me, but you never talked so much like you are doing here. Jusjih never made formal RFDA, as they deliberately abused it due to both the rule and consensus, calling it formal makes you tend to cover Jusjih. Every time when Gzdavidwong and me explaining to you, what was your reaction? Denying then ignoring. You played so unfair and throwing your responsibility to "community". To make it more clever, why wouldn't you keep silent from first? Everyone can talk in Zhws, but not to ignore others saying and pressing like Jusjih. If someone is blocked, it is normal to speak only on their talkpages during the blockage, what are you doubting? Zhxy 519 (talk) 03:22, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
Comment Comment If it's true that Chinese Wikisource certainly has the worst relationship between administrators that I've ever seen. then all administrators, include Jusjih, Gzdavidwong and Midleading as always seen on zh.wikisource's VP, should also be listed below on this same SRP page. Yet I agree that only listing Zhxy 519 is not fair for us. Should I do so? --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 05:40, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
Procedural note: Stewards are internally discussing this @ stewards mailing list. — regards, Revi 06:01, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
I respect it. Zhxy 519 (talk) 14:01, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
And I never used the function like using bans on certain pages. I have changed to only ban Jusjih from editing the de-adminship page. My apologies. Zhxy 519 (talk) 17:12, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
I think how to deal with this issue in the end should be more based on the local consensus of zhws.-- Yinyue200 (talk) 08:13, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
When four out of all six administrators on the project are related with the issue, it may not be the best to rely on so-called "local consensus". After all, Chinese Wikisource, just like other sister projects, is a wiki with relatively small community. I personally really want a peace and compromising solution for everyone, but the situation is gradually and regretfully out of control. —— Eric LiuTalk 15:46, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
I agree Midleading on April 28 that Zhxy 519 is threatening the free speech of the community with an abusive RfC. In addition to Midleading seeking suspension of Zhxy 519's adminship on Chinese Wikisource, I would like to also ask Zhxy 519 to stop senseless cross-wiki revenge by staying out of other wikis.--Jusjih (talk) 02:02, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
  • Oppose Oppose, not emergency as Zhxy_519 still replying Midleading's questions, and Jusjih was wrong according to the rule. --Gzdavidwong (talk) 13:44, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
  • Dear stewards: Zhxy 519 has sabotaged de-sysoping process on Chinese Wikisource thrice with the extreme conflict of interest [7] [8] [9] after having sabotaged the local voting thrice before. [10] [11] [12], plus an abusive Rfc with no regard to w:Wikipedia:Don't remind others of past misdeeds. Please answer SCP-2000.--Jusjih (talk) 22:10, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
    I never understanded why Jusjih always use "conflict of interest". If Jusjih is wrong and keeping move, he can never be blocked? Our local rule said:"Those who deliberately abuse the desysop may be subject to sanction, such as blocking." Jusjih was wrong, and Zhxy_519 blocked him to stop him keeping move, that's all. And the same rule said, urgent de-sysop is for: "Especially if sysops keep repeating their mistakes or can't communicate with them causing huge damage to Wikisource". I said, Zhxy_519's action's span can be discussed, but not wrong. Gzdavidwong (talk) 00:22, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
    This is not a place where S/O votes happens. Take it to local discussion board. — regards, Revi 19:02, 30 April 2022 (UTC)

Yahya@testwikidata

Please remove my sysop rights. —Yahya (talkcontribs.) 08:09, 6 June 2022 (UTC)

Done right away being a test wiki. Not going to touch translation-admin as local crats can manipulate it. — regards, Revi 22:58, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
@-revi: According to testwikidata:Special:UserRights/Yahya I still have administrator access. —Yahya (talkcontribs.) 06:49, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
Yahya Done now. Best --Alaa :)..! 08:51, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
Thank you. —Yahya (talkcontribs.) 08:57, 7 June 2022 (UTC)

Rahuldeshmukh101@mrwikisource

They have importer rights on this project. The user is inactive on this project for last 10 years 2 months. So they are definitely inactive for long. As there was no action and such advance rights should be removed as per Admin activity review? I am bit confused as importer rights is not mentioned in the policy but such long inactivity seems a pretty good reason for removal? QueerEcofeminist [they/them/their] 17:54, 23 May 2022 (UTC)

You can ask the user if they still need it (the user is active on other projects). Ruslik (talk) 20:33, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
Yes, if active means to edit same site notice every year...as that's what they are doing every year. No other edits are seen even on mrwiki. QueerEcofeminist [they/them/their] 18:37, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
I have pinged them on their talk page let's se if they reply. QueerEcofeminist [they/them/their] 19:01, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
on their local talkpage they have replied saying they need it, but no fair rationale for use of it is mentioned, nor they are active after that. Do the needful. thanks QueerEcofeminist [they/them/their] 06:03, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
@QueerEcofeminist: As of now, I don't see a policy-based reason for removal here. AFAICS, there is no inactivity policy that'd set a maximum permitted inactivity period for importers (the AAR doesn't apply, as importers don't fall under AAR's definition of "holders of advanced administrative rights"). I don't see (any) local inactivity policy at mrwikisource -- if there is one, please post a link here, so I can review. I plan to close the request within a few days, if no one provides a valid policy-based reason for the removal. Thank you for your understanding, --Martin Urbanec (talk) 08:40, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
@Martin Urbanec, we don't have any policy regarding inactivity as of now. And as you said importer doesn't fit in aaa policy. You can close this request as not done. Thanks for your help. QueerEcofeminist [they/them/their] 09:58, 7 June 2022 (UTC)

Not done Per above. --Martin Urbanec (talk) 10:44, 7 June 2022 (UTC)

Hamish@metawiki

The user made their last rename more than a year ago at 03:21, 9 June 2021 (UTC), as per the policy, their global renamer rights should be removed. Thanks! -- CptViraj (talk) 05:45, 10 June 2022 (UTC)

Done. Last global rename queue action was 15 April 2021 as well. —MarcoAurelio (talk) 09:04, 10 June 2022 (UTC)

Mohamed Ouda@arwiki

Thanks.--جار الله (talk) 12:52, 1 June 2022 (UTC)

Hello all , please hold this request because I am willing to resume my activity back Mohamed Ouda (talk) 17:55, 1 June 2022 (UTC)

If another steward can put this request {{onhold}} per community discussion; as Ouda sysop flag should be removed per our local policy, but there's a community proposal to give him a chance (and ignore all rules). I'll write further comment when discussion end. Thanks on advance --Alaa :)..! 20:42, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
And it's on hold. -- Amanda (she/her) 23:52, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
Not done for the time being. Feel free to come back when it's clear what action should be taken. -- Amanda (she/her) 04:37, 9 June 2022 (UTC)

Mohamed Ouda@arwiki

Thanks.--جار الله (talk) 11:50, 10 June 2022 (UTC)

Done -- Amanda (she/her) 16:08, 10 June 2022 (UTC)

Misnotkunar sía@iswikiquote

The abusefilter account is Misnotkunarsía. [13] Please remove sysop from this one. Rschen7754 04:27, 12 June 2022 (UTC)

Done, thanks. —MarcoAurelio (talk) 08:59, 12 June 2022 (UTC)

Vojtěch Dostál@cswikipedia

The last admin logs recorded: protect (2020-11-14), block (2020-08-16), delete (2021-05-19; 2021-11-30 delete over redirect, not admin action). Vojta, thank you for your service and contributions. — Draceane talkcontrib. 11:34, 16 June 2022 (UTC)

Done -- Amanda (she/her) 12:03, 17 June 2022 (UTC)

JAn Dudík@metawiki

The user made their last rename more than a year ago at 10:02, 17 June 2021 (UTC), as per the policy, their global renamer rights should be removed. Thanks! -- CptViraj (talk) 05:47, 19 June 2022 (UTC)

Done Ruslik (talk) 20:41, 19 June 2022 (UTC)

編集フィルター @jawikiquote

Old AbuseFilter account, current is 不正利用フィルター according to [14]. Rschen7754 16:57, 18 June 2022 (UTC)

Done. —MarcoAurelio (talk) 09:29, 21 June 2022 (UTC)

Jsdo1980@svwikinews

User has not made an edit or logged action in the last 6 months, and was notified 1 month ago: [15] Please remove sysop.

Required disclosures: I am not an active editor of svwikinews; however, the project is considered "soft-closed". 1 bureaucrat is in agreement [16]. Rschen7754 00:13, 22 June 2022 (UTC)

Done @Jsdo1980:, thank you for your service. --Martin Urbanec (talk) 17:39, 22 June 2022 (UTC)

Green Yoshi@svwikinews

User has not made an edit or logged action in the last 6 months, and was notified 1 month ago: [17] Please remove sysop. Also see disclosures above. Rschen7754 00:13, 22 June 2022 (UTC)

Done @Green Yoshi: Thank you for your service. --Martin Urbanec (talk) 17:43, 22 June 2022 (UTC)

Popperipopp@svwikinews

User has not made an edit or logged action in the last 6 months, and was notified 1 month ago: [18] Please remove sysop. Also see disclosures above. Rschen7754 00:13, 22 June 2022 (UTC)

Done @Popperipopp: Thank you for your service. --Martin Urbanec (talk) 17:43, 22 June 2022 (UTC)

Calandrella@svwikinews

User has not made an edit or logged action in the last 6 months, and was notified 1 month ago: [19] Please remove sysop. Also see disclosures above. Rschen7754 00:13, 22 June 2022 (UTC)

Done @Calandrella: Thank you for your service. --Martin Urbanec (talk) 17:43, 22 June 2022 (UTC)

Micke@svwikinews

User has not made an edit or logged action in the last 6 months, and was notified 1 month ago: [20] Please remove sysop. Also see disclosures above. Rschen7754 00:13, 22 June 2022 (UTC)

Done @Micke: Thank you for your service. --Martin Urbanec (talk) 17:43, 22 June 2022 (UTC)

Kizule@srwiki

Hello, I would like to request removing sysop and bureaucrat rights on all Serbian projects. Best regards, Kizule (talk) 10:45, 22 June 2022 (UTC)

24 hours period isn't needed. Kizule (talk) 10:52, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
Done Skipping 24 customary waiting period on request.--Martin Urbanec (talk) 17:36, 22 June 2022 (UTC)

RobertL & Rxy@testwikipedia

Former administrators. AlPaD (talk) 12:46, 24 June 2022 (UTC)

Done Ruslik (talk) 20:52, 24 June 2022 (UTC)

Eta Carinae@ptwiki

Dear colleagues. In June 22nd, my term as oversight has expired. Please remove my rights on ptwiki. I do not intend to get a renew. Best regards. Eta Carinae (talk) 20:32, 29 June 2022 (UTC)

Done @Eta Carinae: Thank you for your service. --Martin Urbanec (talk) 21:08, 29 June 2022 (UTC)

Miscellaneous requests

[email protected]

Not done Rollback rights are managed by local bureaucrats, not stewards. --Martin Urbanec (talk) 09:45, 31 May 2022 (UTC)

LiseWagner69@frwiki

Confirmed user rights needed. See VRT ticket. Thanks Ruthven (msg) 20:24, 14 June 2022 (UTC)

Done--Vituzzu (talk) 20:26, 14 June 2022 (UTC)

Temporary permissions (expired and rejected requests only)