Jump to content

Steward requests/Permissions/2018-08

Add links
From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki

Administrator access

علاء@ar.wikinews

Status:    Done
Done masti <talk> 10:27, 8 August 2018 (UTC)
Thanks @Masti: —Alaa :)..! 10:38, 8 August 2018 (UTC)

Godric ki Kothri@hiwiki

Status:    Done

Please grant permanent admin right as per RFA. Thanks. आर्यावर्त (talk) 01:00, 9 August 2018 (UTC)

Done Ruslik (talk) 20:43, 9 August 2018 (UTC)

Alex [email protected]

Status:    Done

His candidacy ran for 7 days, as requested, and has not encountered any opposition. I believe it can now be closed.--Strainu (talk) 13:30, 13 August 2018 (UTC)

Done. Wiki looks big enough for perma-sysop. — regards, Revi 13:38, 13 August 2018 (UTC)

Icem4k@nywikipedia

Status:    Not done

I would like to request to be an admin at the Chi-Chewa Wikipedia to fix basic things, translate the main page of the site and also import stuff. I cannot provide a local discussion because there's hardly anyone active there. Chabota (talk) 20:39, 12 August 2018 (UTC)

Still you should put a notice on a village pump or other appropriate forum and wait for one week. Ruslik (talk) 20:45, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
Ruslik Thank you will do so. Chabota (talk) 20:56, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
Doesn't seem to happen, closing as not done. Stryn (talk) 08:19, 16 August 2018 (UTC)

Wasami007@zhwikiversity

Status:    Done

This user requests sysop rights. Local discussion not possible as there's no community yet, but this user is a sysop in beta Wikiversity. GZWDer (talk) 23:44, 7 August 2018 (UTC)

@GZWDer: he should open a local discussion page to grant the sysop flag , even there's no contributes in the local discussion we'll grant him sysop flag after 7 days from the beginning of the local discussion! --Alaa :)..! 08:32, 8 August 2018 (UTC)
I have moved the discussion here.--GZWDer (talk) 08:47, 8 August 2018 (UTC)

 On hold until 15 August --Alaa :)..! 09:11, 8 August 2018 (UTC)

Done Granted for 3 months to expire on 2018-11-15. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. — regards, Revi 07:48, 15 August 2018 (UTC)

FrankyLeRoutier@frwikinews

Status:    Not done

Bonjour à tous, j'aimerais obtenir les statuts d'administrateur et de bureaucrate à la suite du vote communautaire, j'estime le résultat légitime malgré le faible nombre d'avis, il y a très peu de contributeurs actif sur ce projet actuellement et j'aurais sans doute dû mettre des messages sur ceux qui sont toujours là mais j'ai pas voulu faire du démarchage, j'ai déjà eu par le passé le statut d'administrateur voici mon journal d'opération sur Wikinews j'ai mis plusieurs messages au bureaucrate Grondin sans avoir eu de réponse. Cordialement. FrankyLeRoutier (talk) 01:08, 17 August 2018 (UTC)

Revenant de vacances, j'ai pu examiner la candidature. Au regard de la prise de décision concernant l'élection des administrateurs et des bureaucrates, aucune des conditions n'a été remplie. J'ai répondu sur la page de candidature.-- Bertrand GRONDIN  → (Talk) 15:23, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
Merci beauccoup, donc dossier clos. Amicalement. FrankyLeRoutier (talk) 21:39, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
Not done. Local bureaucrat is active and can handle this. Matiia (talk) 04:47, 19 August 2018 (UTC)

Mass request@zhwikiversity

Details inside
夢蝶葬花@zhwikiversity
Status:    Not done

夢蝶葬花 （留言 / Leave a message） 00:09, 15 August 2018 (UTC)

Blissghost@zhwikiversity
Status:    Not done

夢蝶葬花 （留言 / Leave a message） 00:09, 15 August 2018 (UTC)

Hyijun@zhwikiversity
Status:    Not done

夢蝶葬花 （留言 / Leave a message） 00:09, 15 August 2018 (UTC)

Leiem@zhwikiversity
Status:    Not done

夢蝶葬花 （留言 / Leave a message） 00:09, 15 August 2018 (UTC)

WQL@zhwikiversity
Status:    Not done

夢蝶葬花 （留言 / Leave a message） 00:09, 15 August 2018 (UTC)

Xiplus@zhwikiversity
Status:    Not done

夢蝶葬花 （留言 / Leave a message） 00:09, 15 August 2018 (UTC)

Bowleerin@zhwikiversity
Status:    Not done

夢蝶葬花 （留言 / Leave a message） 00:09, 15 August 2018 (UTC)

-Zest@zhwikiversity
Status:    Not done

夢蝶葬花 （留言 / Leave a message） 00:09, 15 August 2018 (UTC)

Koala0090@zhwikiversity
Status:    Not done

夢蝶葬花 （留言 / Leave a message） 00:09, 15 August 2018 (UTC)

Taiwania Justo@zhwikiversity
Status:    Not done
Cohaf@zhwikiversity
Status:    Not done
Richard923888@zhwikiversity
Status:    Not done
黄启塬@zhwikiversity
Status:    Not done
NHC@zhwikiversity
Status:    Not done
Adsa562@zhwikiversity
Status:    Not done
Yannmaco@zhwikiversity
Status:    Not done
Stang@zhwikiversity
Status:    Not done
ArthurLau1997@zhwikiversity
Status:    Not done
Kuon.Haku@zhwikiversity
Status:    Not done
林立云@zhwikiversity
Status:    Not done
Hamish@zhwikiversity
Status:    Not done
宋世怡@zhwikiversity
Status:    Not done
UserZx@zhwikiversity
Status:    Not done
ZackTseng@zhwikiversity
Status:    Not done
行到水穷处@zhwikiversity
Status:    Not done
Jyxyl9@zhwikiversity
Status:    Not done
Sanmosa@zhwikiversity
Status:    Not done
Kanashimi@zhwikiversity
Status:    Not done
Mass zhwikiversity requests were marked on hold. — regards, Revi 07:54, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
I know that communities are generally self-managed. But zhwikiversity is a brand-new project, just spun off from Beta, and I seriously question whether that many sysops are really necessary. StevenJ81 (talk) 13:38, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Based on the discussion with other stewards (this was the reason I put it on hold), I am declining this mass request for A/IA. We are in favor of the (miraculous) growth of the wikis, but this wiki is barely two weeks past the wiki's creation, and our assessment is that zhwikiversity is not yet at the stage where you need 29 admins. I ask that zhwikiversity choose the most trusted candidate, 2-4 preferably, but no more than 5. The same applies to int-admin. — regards, Revi 14:01, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
  • @-revi:can we at least have 10. Many of the candidates have other wiki sysop/patroller duties/school work (these are the strongest candidates). We need every manpower.--Cohaf (talk) 17:51, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
  • @-revi:@StevenJ81:I agree with Cohaf's opinion that we need at least 10 admins. What's worse, 10 may be not enough, because most of candidates are still busy students now. When they start a new term, they may become much more inactive. On the contrary, enthusiastic users mightn't mind whether there were active admins or not, and this must cause a large amount of work for only 5 admins. Mass admins or backlog? If you do want to limit the number, I suggest restart the discussion after 3 months; but before that, can we get the authority to finish early tasks.--Blissghost (talk) 19:09, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
    • Come on. Where do all these users suddenly come from? Did 100 vandals appear suddenly as well? --MF-W 19:58, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
      • I've got to admit: One thing made me nervous about recommending this project for approval: Enormous numbers of edits at Beta had been made by anonymous users. So it's entirely possible that all of these folks are the "anonymous users" from Beta.
That having been said, let me share some numbers here: Currently, v:zh:Special:ActiveUsers gives a list of about 80 users, of whom about 30 had more than 10 actions. (And you're one of them, MF-W.) The most users that the zh test at Beta ever had in any given recent month was about 16, including "Anonymous".
Are any stewards or GS fluent enough in Chinese to look this over? Otherwise, I'm inclined to pick the three people from among the applicants above who were most active while this test was still at Beta and flag them for no longer than 1–3 months—none as IA, and none before 27 August. StevenJ81 (talk) 21:28, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
@StevenJ81: As I can see, no steward know any Chinese. Maybe you may consider picking the first 10 (if possible, or at least first 5) users to be zh.wikiversity sysops. Sænmōsà 00:29, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
Maybe we can flag those (max 5, again) who were active during betawikiversity, but I'm not convinced that the zhwikiversity is different from any other new wikis that this unprecedented 29 admins are really justified. — regards, Revi 02:01, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
Agree. One more number: Not counting the big multilingual wikis like Commons, Meta and Wikidata, there are something like 25 projects in the entire WMF world with that many sysops. StevenJ81 (talk) 03:20, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
@-revi: I disagree with the max. no. of 5: comparing with other wikis, ratio of sysops to other users are commonly 1:10, and you now fixed the no. of sysops to 5, which means the ratio is now 1:16, which means the no. of sysops in the Wikiversity is not sufficient. I strongly recommend to increase the no. of sysops to 8 to 10, to fulfill the ratio of 1:10. Sænmōsà 04:07, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
Sorry, I'm not willing to negotiate, and actually if other steward closed this, you'd have to choose 1 or 2 among them. — regards, Revi 04:11, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
(withdrawn speech) Sænmōsà 13:10, 23 August 2018 (UTC)
@Sanmosa: Strong oppose: Currently no consensus have been made over the community. I think Samosa's behavior is inappropriate and confusing.--Panzer VI-II (talk) 04:53, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
(withdrawn speech) Sænmōsà 13:10, 23 August 2018 (UTC)
It's obvious that only a few users have joined the discussion while different opinions exist. Having not joined the discussions (for I'm busy these days) doesn't mean that I haven't viewed the pages on the zh-Wikiversity.--Panzer VI-II (talk) 05:03, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
(withdrawn speech) Sænmōsà 13:10, 23 August 2018 (UTC)
Provided you have community consensus for 5 or less (int)admins, I can flag them subject to usual conventions. — regards, Revi 06:59, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
  • @-revi and StevenJ81:we got to know about the project based on the notice on the centralized discussion noticeboard on zhwiki and will like to lend a hand. I cannot speak for others but to label us as anon, I did not anon edit before, am a patroler at zhwiki, etc. Since zhuniversity is so prominently, even the recent changes at zhwiki included a link to zhuni, vandals , lta can follow the same and appear. I will hope for 10 or not least 8. --Cohaf (talk) 07:29, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
    • @Cohaf: Thank you for that explanation. I was simply speculating about where all of you might have come from, and whether or not any of you ever contributed to the zhwikiversity while it was still at Beta Wikiversity. No insult was intended, by any means. But the fact that a big announcement was made at zhwiki explains a lot.
@Sanmosa: Ordinarily, consensus is the most important piece of this. But given that the wiki and community are brand new, I think you are actually correct that steward trust is going to be a component of the decision at this stage of the game. (Put another way, is there a real, functioning community yet whose consensus we can accurately measure?) Given that, then ...
@-revi: You're the steward, not me. But let me suggest the following four individuals as representing a reasonable place to start for now:
  • User:Stang. This user is one of the five users who were very active on the zhwikiversity test project at Beta from the beginning of 2018 until the project was spun off. This user, in fact, is the only applicant who is a sysop (custodian) on Beta Wikiversity; the user is also a 'crat and sysop on zhwiki. So this user knows how to use mops.
  • User:夢蝶葬花. (In case I miscopied, that's the first person on the list above.) This user is also one of the five users who were regularly active at Beta. This user is sysop and IA on zhwikivoyage.
The other three of the five active users from Beta have not applied so far. Among everyone else who has applied, several have light rights like patroller and rollbacker on some zh projects, and a couple made a handful of edits at Beta. But only two others have sysop experience somewhere:
  • User:Xiplus. This user is sysop and IA on zhwiki, and sysop on zhwiktionary.
  • User:Kanashimi. This user is sysop on zhwikinews and on test.wikipedia.
So unless the community has a real problem with any of these four, that's probably where I'd start, were it my decision to make. (All applied for sysop; all but Stang also applied for IA.) StevenJ81 (talk) 16:04, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
  • @StevenJ81:please hold for community discussion. For information, the patroller flag on zhwiki is autopatrol, patrol, file mover as well as page mover combined into one. For roll backer it's page mover, rollback as well as abuse filter private. Each application will undergo a mini RFA where questions are asked as well as votes tallied, community play a role. it's not the enwiki PERM where no community input is allowed. These are not minor rights but important rights and we are listed on the list of administrative personal online chart at zhwiki. I will personally be contended with a curator flag but then this must be on hold. Early community consensus does not tally with your recommendations totally although Xiplus is definitely in. If need be, can grant him the flag.--Cohaf (talk) 16:14, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
No worries, I'm not going to grant the permissions overnight, and I trust other steward not to do so. — regards, Revi 16:18, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
In any event, it's -revi's decision to make, not mine. I was providing information. (Side note: the one applicant I would suggest is not eligible, even if the community supports, is User:UserZx. That user has a grand total of 156 edits across all projects. So unless there is editing history under a different name somewhere, in general that user would be considered too inexperienced.) StevenJ81 (talk) 16:23, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
nonsense rant
  • @Cohaf: Mea maxima culpa. No rant necessary. I'm convinced that the trust level involved with those two rights sets on zhwiki is just about the same, if not exactly the same, as RfA. There's still the issue of experience with the toolkit itself. After all, patrollers and rollbackers cannot delete pages, block users, revision-delete, and other such things. In that sense, even on zhwiki, patrollers and rollbackers do not have experience with the full toolbox.
Look, ultimately, the decision here is -revi's, and the community's, not mine. But if my opinion is worth anything, I need to point out that Stang and 夢蝶葬花 worked hard to get zhwikiversity to the point where it could be approved and spun off. In my opinion—and it's only my opinion, of course—your community is not established and stable enough to decide that they don't deserve a role. Remember: you would not have a zhwikiversity now if it weren't for them. StevenJ81 (talk) 21:23, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
  • (edit conflicted)@StevenJ81:I fully support them and was in the process of removing the rant with this edit summary "removed rant as it's a little too much retrospectively and does not help in discussion, sorry for inconveniences caused" pardon me for carrying local issues here and sorry for the one additional nonsense ping you have to bear. I collapsed my discussion to prevent this being too long (I would like it removed but can't since it is replied to).To be crystal clear, I'm fully in support for Stang/夢蝶葬花, the former I interacted very frequently in CAT:CSD and AFD as well as numerous admin requests and is one of the zhwiki admins I am closest to and I enjoyed seeking help from him. As the latter, we participated in AFD, policy making together and there is no one ounce of doubt they can be a good sysop. In fact, the community is trying to nominate 夢蝶葬花 also. The rest of the proposed nominees are, for clarity is -Zest/WQL. (i.e. 4 additional sysops proposed now are 夢蝶葬花,Xiplus,WQL,-Zest).And to be clearer, the level of trust for rollbackers/patrollers is much lowerthan RFA, I'm just comparing the application process vis-a-vis other project, in fact, no RFA succeeded for a year already--Cohaf (talk) 21:28, 16 August 2018 (UTC)

Icem4k@nywikipedia

Status:    Done

I would like to request to be an admin at the Chi-Chewa Wikipedia to fix basic things, translate the main page of the site and also import stuff. I posted on our local discussion but there's hardly anyone active there. If you check the last edits you see that its mostly me making edits at the moment am very active on simple and english and i really want to help this grow as well.

 On hold until 23 August 2018 Ruslik (talk) 20:54, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Done Granted for 4 months to expire on 2018-12-23. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. -- MBisanz talk 01:22, 23 August 2018 (UTC)
@MBisanz and Ruslik Thanks for the granting me to be the admin on my local wiki chi-chewa now am asking for extra rights on to be an importer i wish to import some templates when i try to make that action i keep getting this message No wikis from which to import have been defined and direct history uploads are disabled.--Chabota (talk) 14:45, 24 August 2018 (UTC)

Klein_Muçi@sqwikiquote

Status:    Done

Three supports and no disagreement. Liridon (talk) 12:45, 17 August 2018 (UTC)

Done Granted for 3 months to expire on 2018-11-17. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. -- --Alaa :)..! 13:17, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
Thank you! :) - Klein Muçi (talk) 14:12, 17 August 2018 (UTC)

ThiênĐế98@viwisource

Status:    Done

Four supports and no disagreement. Thanks. Tuyenduong97 (talk) 15:18, 17 August 2018 (UTC)

Done Granted for 6 months to expire on 2019-02-18. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. Ruslik (talk) 20:57, 18 August 2018 (UTC)

Janak [email protected]

Status:    Done

Hi, I am a active editor on Doteli Wikipedia. I am making permanent admin request at the Doteli Wikipedia(dty) to fix the basic things, manage the main page. Thank you. - Janak Bhatta (talk) 02:42, 21 August 2018 (UTC)

Original request on wrong section: Special:PermaLink/18316498#[email protected]. Regards, — TBhagat (contribs | talk) 05:28, 21 August 2018 (UTC)

Done Granted for 6 months to expire on 2019-02-23. — regards, Revi 08:55, 23 August 2018 (UTC)

أحمد ناجي@ar.wiktionary

Status:    Done

Hi. This is request per local discussion for renewal of user:أحمد ناجي temporary adminship as it near expiration. Please grant him temporary adminship for 6 months period. Kind Regards--مصعب (talk) 22:56, 22 August 2018 (UTC)

Done Granted for 6 months to expire on 2019-02-23. — regards, Revi 08:58, 23 August 2018 (UTC)

[email protected]

Status:    Done

User:Gnangbade, who already several times was temporal sysop of kbp.wikipedia, requests to renew his sysop status. If it is possible, please set this for as long as possible. This user is the main initiator of this wiki project and one of the main keepers. It will be less unnecessary bureaucracy if he would have sysop status permanently. Hugo.arg (talk) 08:42, 23 August 2018 (UTC)

Done Granted for 1 year to expire on 2019-08-23. — regards, Revi 08:59, 23 August 2018 (UTC)

DARIO [email protected]

Status:    Done

Hi, please could you assign permanent adminship as per consensus in the vote? This is the third time that I request. I am a permanent global sysop with over 100,000 editions [1] distributed in four hundred projects of the Wikimedia Foundation. I am also a sysop on Wikivoyage (pt) and Wikipedia (pt). In addition to the normal editions as editor I have more than 25,000 administrative editions as sysop in two hundreds of projects. Thank you. DARIO SEVERI (talk) 05:09, 22 August 2018 (UTC)

Done. NB that I didn't give you permanent adminship because of your numerous qualities, but because numerous users who regularly seem to contribute to pt.n supported your request. --MF-W 19:36, 25 August 2018 (UTC)

[email protected]

Status:    Done

How to become a permanent admin? I hope I.. ShiminUfesoj (talk) 17:42, 23 August 2018 (UTC)

Done Granted for 1 year to expire on 2019-08-25. For permanent adminship, there usually needs to be a bit of a larger local community. --MF-W 19:39, 25 August 2018 (UTC)

Küñ[email protected]

Status:    Done

Having been notified that my rights were to expire (under my former account Diego Grez-Cañete) I asked the community if there was a problem in having my rights transferred from that account over my current one. So far there has not been opposition after over two weeks. In fact, I just want to confirm I want to retain my right, but have it transferred. Thanks in advance {{subst:User:Fire in the Hole/sign}} 03:25, 26 August 2018 (UTC)

Transferred sysop from Diego to the current one. — regards, Revi 06:53, 26 August 2018 (UTC)

[email protected]

Status:    Done

Hello. I was elected sysop in local election (3:0:0) during a 2 weeks as per vote rule in Korean Wiktionary. Thanks. --Garam (talk) 06:02, 26 August 2018 (UTC)

Done Granted for 3 months to expire on 2018-11-26. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. — regards, Revi 06:48, 26 August 2018 (UTC)

[email protected]

Status:    Not done

Hello! Our problem is to upload a file to the local Wikipedia. Only administrators can upload files to local Wikipedia now. Everybody agrees on the forum. Please, give users the right to upload files. Thank you! -- Malikxan (talk) 13:07, 26 August 2018 (UTC)

We can't grant such rights. You need to ask configuration changes in Phabricator, read Requesting wiki configuration changes. And I'm not sure will they change configuratios for upload. Stryn (talk) 13:47, 26 August 2018 (UTC)

-Zest@zhwikiquote

Status:    Done

Request temp sysop.--Zest (talk) 05:33, 27 August 2018 (UTC)

Done Granted for 3 months to expire on 2018-11-27. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. Ruslik (talk) 20:17, 27 August 2018 (UTC)

[email protected]

Status:    Done
Status:    Done
  • Both candidates were approved by the community by 4/0/0.
  • Both recently completed three-month admin terms. However, I believe they can be granted one-year terms this round, for the following reasons:
    • Chabi has experience as a sysop not only here but also on jamwiki and (using the account Katxis) on ladwiki. He was test-sysop on Incubator for both jamwiki and lfnwiki. He knows how to use the tools.
    • Cgboeree has less sysop experience. But he is literally the world's leading expert on this language (having created it). The community respects his opinions and decisions. Moreover, FWIW (and I've looked), I see no evidence whatsoever that lfnwiki (or any other project here) reports on him in any other than a neutral POV. So I see no harm to the project, and plenty of benefit, to allowing him the stability of a full-year term. StevenJ81 (talk) 22:18, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
      • Done Granted for 1 year to expire on 2019-08-30. I daresay I ignored your comments about why these users can be given one-year terms, as stewards should not grant shorter or longer terms depending on what they think of the candidates' merits, but based on whether or not the participation in the RFAs justifies permanent adminship. --MF-W 22:41, 30 August 2018 (UTC)

Ruthven@napwiki

Status:    Done

Temporary adminship's expiring. Can you please grant me adminship for 6-12 months this time? Thanks --Ruthven (msg) 14:17, 19 August 2018 (UTC)

 On hold till 2018-08-28. — regards, Revi 14:20, 19 August 2018 (UTC)
Done Granted for 1 year to expire on 2019-08-30. --MF-W 15:44, 30 August 2018 (UTC)

Interface administrator access

Épine@ckbwiki

Status:    Done

Interface administrator user right request for Épine ▸ épine talk♬ 13:35, 30 July 2018 (UTC)

Done – Ajraddatz (talk) 16:16, 30 July 2018 (UTC)

Calak@ckbwiki

Status:    Done

Interface administrator user right request for Calak ▸ épine talk♬ 13:35, 30 July 2018 (UTC)

Done – Ajraddatz (talk) 16:16, 30 July 2018 (UTC)

TmY e12@trwikiquote

Status:    Done

I did not understand because my English is not very good. If do not need to apply at local Wiki. Can I get the privilege of the interface-admin within the time I am a sysop? --TmѰ e12 Talk 21:49, 3 August 2018 (UTC)

Done Ruslik (talk) 08:05, 5 August 2018 (UTC)
Thanks --TmѰ e12 Talk 10:50, 5 August 2018 (UTC)

Mass request@zhwikiversity

Details inside
Xiplus@zhwikiversity
Status:    Not done
WQL@zhwikiversity
Status:    Not done
-Zest@zhwikiversity
Status:    Not done
夢蝶葬花@zhwikiversity
Status:    Not done
Wasami007@zhwikiversity
Status:    Not done
Bowleerin@zhwikiversity
Status:    Not done
Kanashimi@zhwikiversity
Status:    Not done

Yuriy_kosygin@zhwikivoyage

Status:    Done

3 supports, and no oppose or neutral. 夢蝶葬花 (☎) 14:32, 16 August 2018 (UTC)

Granted to expire with the adminship. — regards, Revi 14:37, 16 August 2018 (UTC)

夢蝶葬花@zhwikivoyage

Status:    Done

3 supports, and no oppose or neutral. 夢蝶葬花 (☎) 14:32, 16 August 2018 (UTC)

Granted to expire with the adminship. — regards, Revi 14:40, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
@-revi: My administrator is appointed until 2018-11-26, not 2018-11-8. Can you re-edit the authorization time? Thank you.--夢蝶葬花 (☎) 14:50, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
Fixed. Probably confused with Yuriy. — regards, Revi 14:51, 16 August 2018 (UTC)

Xavier Dengra@cawikiquote

Status:    Done

Two active admins of the project would be able to edit sitewide CSS/JS pages per community discussion. --Docosong (talk) 20:28, 18 August 2018 (UTC)

Done Ruslik (talk) 20:51, 18 August 2018 (UTC)

Docosong@cawikiquote

Status:    Done

Two active admins of the project would be able to edit sitewide CSS/JS pages per community discussion. --Docosong (talk) 20:28, 18 August 2018 (UTC)

Done Ruslik (talk) 20:52, 18 August 2018 (UTC)

Xavier Dengra@cawikibooks

Status:    Done

Only active admin of the project would be able to edit sitewide CSS/JS pages per community discussion. --Docosong (talk) 20:28, 18 August 2018 (UTC)

Done. Matiia (talk) 04:43, 19 August 2018 (UTC)

[email protected]

Status:    Done

Openbk (talk) 22:40, 19 August 2018 (UTC)

Done. Interface-admin bundled to sysop. — regards, Revi 07:59, 20 August 2018 (UTC)

Mxn@viwikibooks

Status:    Done

Four approvals and no disapprovals in two weeks. This right will be used sparingly; see statistics from the past year. Most of the time, I end up editing this wiki's interface messages, sitewide scripts, and gadgets to synchronize them with the Vietnamese Wikipedia and Vietnamese Wiktionary, where I serve as a bureaucrat. My account is protected by 2FA and I only log into my account from devices I own. – Minh Nguyễn 💬 04:53, 21 August 2018 (UTC)

Done, best regards. —MarcoAurelio (talk) 15:09, 21 August 2018 (UTC)

Mxn@viwikisource

Status:    Done

Five approvals and no disapprovals in two weeks. This right will be used sparingly; see statistics from the past year. Most of the time, I end up editing this wiki's interface messages, sitewide scripts, and gadgets to synchronize them with the Vietnamese Wikipedia and Vietnamese Wiktionary, where I serve as a bureaucrat. My account is protected by 2FA and I only log into my account from devices I own. – Minh Nguyễn 💬 04:58, 21 August 2018 (UTC)

Done, best regards. —MarcoAurelio (talk) 15:09, 21 August 2018 (UTC)

Bureaucrat access

Klein Muçi@sqwikiquote

Status:    Not done

I've been a member of Wikipedia sq for more than 5 years and lately I've been participating in other projects too, like Wikidata and Meta-Wiki. Unfortunately, a lot of our communities in Albanian aren't exactly thriving with activity. Wikiquotes sq hasn't had new articles since many months ago (the only new one is the one I created when I first joined it) and all its bureaucrats have been removed from their position a long time ago because of their inactivity for more than two years. I find the project very easy to use and it's kinda sad it's been dead for a long time. I made a local request there but since it doesn't have any active bureaucrats I thought I should request it here. - Klein Muçi (talk) 05:26, 6 August 2018 (UTC)

The community is not large enough to grant bureaucrat access in it. Less than 100 articles, 2 active users monthly and no sysop(s) --Alaa :)..! 06:29, 6 August 2018 (UTC)
@علاء: Oh, I thought the community should had bureaucrats first and then sysops. My bad. So, I should make a request for a sysop instead? - Klein Muçi (talk) 09:48, 6 August 2018 (UTC)
@Klein Muçi: Yes, you should open a discussion for 7 days on the village pump, then apply the request here on Meta. Best --Alaa :)..! 15:16, 6 August 2018 (UTC)

[email protected]

Status:    Not done

Per community discussion WAN233 (talk) 09:49, 9 August 2018 (UTC)

I doubt that the community is large enough to have bureaucrats. Ruslik (talk) 20:39, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
lzh:維基大典:會館 has too many backlog complex discussions that need to be handled properly.They are all the best administrator at zh-classical wikipedia.Interface-admin needs to be elected.There will be many people in the election.Local bureaucrats can make community work efficiently--WAN233 (talk) 14:47, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
Agreed, a community with only 4 sysops doesn't need bureaucrats. --MF-W 15:33, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
+1. Complex discussions can be handled by a uninvolved admin and we can grant the Interface-admin requests. Matiia (talk) 02:45, 15 August 2018 (UTC)

Marking all 3 as not done. --MF-W 01:13, 17 August 2018 (UTC)

[email protected]

Status:    Not done

Per community discussion WAN233 (talk) 09:49, 9 August 2018 (UTC)

丁子君@zh-classical.wikipedia

Status:    Not done

Per community discussion WAN233 (talk) 09:49, 9 August 2018 (UTC)

Jawikiversity

Status:    Done

By 2 pros and no cons in our village-pump discussion, we have a consensus that both of our active custodians should have interface-admin access. Thank you. --Kanjy (talk) 10:01, 25 August 2018 (UTC)

Do you really need it? You have never edited any js/css pages. アルトクール has edited them a couple of times. Ruslik (talk) 19:52, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
Ping @Kanjy: --Alaa :)..! 09:45, 26 August 2018 (UTC)
Yes, I would like to edit CSS/JS on ja.wikiversity, as well as I did on ja.wiktionary and ja.wikibooks. Recently I feel that we need several input-aiding gadgets and related styles for some kind of educational materials, such as for math equations. I speak JS (of versions defined as ES5.1 -- ES2017 only) and CSS (up to level 3).
Of course such a small wiki as ours need not edit CSS/JS pages very often. However, as the meta page “Interface administrators” writes, we discussed that we should have at least two interface-admins. Thank you. --Kanjy (talk) 11:14, 26 August 2018 (UTC)
Please grant the access to them. Kanjy is an experienced user and a former global sysop. --rxy (talk) 11:22, 26 August 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for clarifying. Done for both. Stryn (talk) 11:59, 26 August 2018 (UTC)

zhwikiquote

Status:    Done
Status:    Done

Request temp Interface administrator.--Zest (talk) 05:36, 27 August 2018 (UTC)

For how long? Ruslik (talk) 20:08, 27 August 2018 (UTC)
For 3 months,thanks.Zest (talk) 03:08, 28 August 2018 (UTC)
Done Ruslik (talk) 17:59, 31 August 2018 (UTC)

CheckUser access

Oversight access

[email protected]

Status:    Done

Please, attribute to me oversight permission for one year, according votation on this page. Teles, Defender and RadiX can confirm, if necessary. Thanks! Stanglavine (talk) 16:47, 27 August 2018 (UTC)

Done. @RadiX: please add Stanglavine to mail:oversight-wp-pt. Trijnsteltalk 19:28, 27 August 2018 (UTC)
@Trijnstel: Done as well. RadiX∞ 02:22, 28 August 2018 (UTC)

Removal of access

Wagino 20100516@wikidata

Status:    Done

Inactive per policy. Stryn (talk) 11:29, 1 August 2018 (UTC)

Done. Matiia (talk) 21:37, 1 August 2018 (UTC)

Ireas@dewiki

Status:    Done

Per local inactivity policy. User has been inactive for more than one year. He was informed about the upcoming removal of access 90 days ago. -- Dschungelfan (talk) 07:32, 3 August 2018 (UTC)

Done, Linedwell [talk] 05:11, 4 August 2018 (UTC)

[email protected]

Status:    Not done

According to local policy If an administrator within 3 months doesn't make 500 edits and 50 sysop actions, sysop rights will be removed without voting. In several three-month periods he has not made the required 500 edit (January-March, February-April, March-May, April-June, also 17 April to 17 July). There is also consensus in KaWiki, please have a look at the last activities in this discussion. Deu. 06:26, 31 July 2018 (UTC)

Keep local discussion to local. — regards, Revi 02:58, 1 August 2018 (UTC)
Strong oppose — If you look at the latest statistics of the admin, you can understand that it is active, so it was not necessary for the removal of the flag in this time. At the moment there is no reason to remove the rights, or is there a law that you can apply later, when the administrator active? --Mehman 97 16:06, 31 July 2018 (UTC)
Dear Mehman, you as a Georgian Wikipedian could participate in this discussion. Mehman's argument has already been discussed locally and there is a democratic consensus: All responding users demand the removal of administrative rights. Namely: Giorgi13, Surprizi, Beqabai, Gobrona, Giorgi Balakhadze, გიორგი ჩუბინიძე, Zangala, SHOTHA, Fiqriasidamonize, პაატა შ and me. The only opponent in KaWiki was user David1010. Deu. 16:36, 31 July 2018 (UTC)
Dear DEU, if Mr. MIKHEIL were not an active administrator at the moment, I would also agree with you, but he is active. So I see no reason to deprive him of his rights. You had to apply then when the fact was fixed, and not after that. --Mehman 97 16:58, 31 July 2018 (UTC)
Also, dear DEU, the link that you presented to us is the forum of arbitration, and the forum where the question of removing the full authority of the administrator should be resolved is here, so let's solve this issue democratically by means of voting. So the issue in the local wikipedia on this issue is not resolved, and you alone should not decide this problem! --Mehman 97 17:12, 31 July 2018 (UTC)
Hi people, this page is not for the discussion whether the removal should happen or not. Please discuss it locally. Thanks! — regards, Revi 17:15, 31 July 2018 (UTC)
Dear Mehman, it is unfortunate that you did not participate in local discussion, even though you were informed about the discussion. Okay, it's clear that you're a second opponent with user David1010. As I said, your argument has already been discussed locally. In addition, according to the local rules, I first applied in KaWiki on 18 July. At that moment, MIKHEIL was not sufficiently active for half a year. That's why the local users agree that admin rights should be removed. @-revi, it was already discussed locally. Deu. 17:20, 31 July 2018 (UTC)
Dear DEU, I repeat, the page you submitted to us is a forum, and not a page where the issue of removing rights should be decided. Let's then democratically decide on the page of removing the admin's rights this issue, by voting. That's how the question will be solved. --Mehman 97 17:29, 31 July 2018 (UTC)
Dear Mehman, it has already been said that this is not a suitable place for such discussion. After the local policy If an administrator within 3 months doesn't make 500 edits and 50 sysop actions, sysop rights will be removed without voting. It does not even matter where the discussion took place. All the above users have expressed their own opinion and there is already a democratic consensus. You can discuss the matter further locally. Deu. 17:39, 31 July 2018 (UTC)
Dear DEU, you do not want to understand me or do it on meaningly? I tell you where the law that the administrator should lose his rights when he is active? if he was not active and because of this he should lose his rights, then give us this law and I will agree with you. Yes, perhaps it's time to discuss this locally. --Mehman 97 17:48, 31 July 2018 (UTC)
By decision of the majority of Georgian Wikipedians, MIKHEIL remains the administrator of the Georgian Wikipedia. Please refuse and close this request. Thanks --Mehman 97 20:25, 8 August 2018 (UTC)

Not done --MF-W 15:34, 10 August 2018 (UTC)

Recent [email protected]

Status:    Done

Per local inactivity policy. He has been informed on his userpage about the same. Thanks. Leaderboard (talk) 15:35, 7 August 2018 (UTC)

Done Ruslik (talk) 20:20, 8 August 2018 (UTC)
Thanks - QuiteUnusual (talk) 09:25, 10 August 2018 (UTC)

[email protected]

Status:    Done

Unfortunately I haven't been able to meet the activity requirements and respectfully request removal of the oversight permission for security reasons. Thank you in advance, –xeno 19:20, 8 August 2018 (UTC)

Done; best regards. —MarcoAurelio (talk) 20:01, 8 August 2018 (UTC)

[email protected]

Status:    Done

User Piwaiwaka at mi (Māori Wikipedia) Re the comment on my talk page there, I request removal of my administrator rights for reason of inactivity, which I don’t see changing and I believe that the Wikipedia is served better when administrators are members of the currently active community. Thank you Piwaiwaka (talk) 06:13, 10 August 2018 (UTC)

Note to stewards: this needs to be noted at Admin activity review/2017/Data when this is done. --Rschen7754 06:28, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
Dear Piwaiwaka, thanks for your service as an admin. I removed your rights. --MF-W 15:36, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
Clerking note. @Rschen7754: I wasn't sure what you wanted noted at AAR, so I didn't archive. StevenJ81 (talk) 15:18, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
What Rschen wanted is done by MF-W: Special:Diff/18288868 — regards, Revi 15:30, 15 August 2018 (UTC)

[email protected]

Status:    Done

I do not want the permission for Interface administrator access Rapaloux (talk) 09:52, 11 August 2018 (UTC)

Moved to correct section.  On hold for 1 day, standard for resignation of advanced permissions — regards, Revi 11:01, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
Done. — regards, Revi 14:06, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
Merci à toi, l’ami. --Rapaloux (talk) 07:28, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

用心阁@zh.wikipedia

Status:    Done
  • 用心阁 has been inactive longer than 6 months that local policy prescribed, and still be inactive after notified over 1 month. As a local Bcrat I hereby request for removing their sysop flag, Thank you.—AT (talk) 09:28, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
Done. Thank you for the service. — regards, Revi 14:09, 13 August 2018 (UTC)

[email protected]

Status:    Done

(As per administrator removal policy of SD Wiki, admin must make one edit at least in a year, but mentioned user made his last edit almost 16 months ago!.) Arslanali (talk) 13:44, 13 August 2018 (UTC)

Done Ruslik (talk) 20:51, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
Thanks Arslanali (talk) 11:11, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

[email protected]

Status:    Done

He/she has been inactive over the last 3 months on jawiki. Please remove his/her sysop access as per our desysop policy. Thanks in advance. --Penn Station (talk) 01:40, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

Done. — regards, Revi 06:25, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

[email protected]

Status:    Locally handled

Local bureaucrats refused to remove flag from my account at ruwiki. Please, just do it. Vlsergey (talk) 06:25, 10 August 2018 (UTC)

Please hold this request on 3 days, this a emotions. Thanks. // Просьба отложить решение на 3 дня, это на эмоциях на фоне конфликта в рувики. Спасибо. [2] -- dima_st_bk 06:38, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
Being a member of Arbitration Committee (ru:Википедия:Арбитражный комитет), I would like to ask for putting this particular request on hold, as well as any similar requests coming from ruwiki within next a couple of weeks. The thing is there is an active conflict between some sysops, engineers and bureaucrats in ruwiki, which is related to the new technical flag (interface-admin) to be given to a couple of non-technical sysops, and which results into emotional reactions. A couple of active editors already requested to remove their flags in ruwiki, and local bureaucrats indeed refused to do that. Vlsergey is only one of them, and the only one who decided to get in touch with Stewards. But just so you know the order of magnitude, 5 out of 10 existing engineers in ruwiki requested the flags to be removed, so you can only imagine what would happen to the technical side of ruwiki if all of these requests were executed. I believe we will address the issues with the interface-admin flag within next 2 weeks, have the community to approve the related rules and policies, and after that engineers and sysops will be able to make well thought-out decisions. --Good Will Hunting (talk) 06:44, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
6 of 10, and 2 more on hold. --Serhio Magpie (talk) 06:49, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
Not done there's 5 bureaucrats, so it should be handled locally --Alaa :)..! 07:20, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
Additional explanation: Stewards do not perform actions on wikis with ability to self-manage, unless there is emergency ("crat says no" is not an emergency) or all the crats are gone for a long time (at least 6 months - 1 year). Not the case here. — regards, Revi 10:59, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
@-revi and علاء: The following is not meant to suggest that you act contrary to an explicit request from ruwiki's ArbCom at all. But if @Good Will Hunting had not appeared, I do not see where policy would allow anybody to force a user to hold rights that s/he does not want to keep.
We have a 24-hour hold rule here for resignations of rights, and for good reason. But if someone wishes to resign rights on a self-managing wiki, and bureaucrats fail to act within (3 days?)(7 days?)(surely something longer than 24 hours), then in my opinion stewards actually should act. This is not like most other situations where we normally don't want stewards to act when 'crats can. This is a case of a user not being permitted to voluntarily give up rights. And as long as we're satisfied there has been a cooling off period, we should facilitate that. StevenJ81 (talk) 21:22, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
Policy(+"If there are any doubts as to whether or not an action should be performed, stewards should not act unless it is an emergency or there are no active local users to do it.") is that we do not intervene on the projects with active crats, so it's unactionable. — regards, Revi 01:00, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
Question is "What is an active local crat?" I'd argue that if crats are missing from a project for a week (and, let's just say, haven't left a return date on-wiki), that constitutes "no active local users to do it" for this purpose. StevenJ81 (talk) 13:24, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
I agree and have said so already several times in this section, although mostly with regard to sysop resignations from wikis where bureaucrats can remove sysops. I find it ridiculous to refer resigning sysops to such a local bureaucrat, no matter whether active or not. A resignation by itself cannot be controversial (it may very well be "under a cloud", as enwiki likes to say, but it is by definition requested by the affected user), so there is no harm if a steward executes it. On the contrary, a user who really wants to get rid of a usergroup (while the community is trying to convince him to stay and delays acting on the request) can simply start to act rogue to force stewards to remove him. Before going into such childish games, I'd prefer if the rights are simply removed... --MF-W 13:33, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
How comes there is no harm in getting the request executed by a steward, if both local crats and local arbitrators do explicitly confirm they are active, and do confirm they are working on addressing the issue that caused the resignation request, and the user has been active in ruwiki and has not been playing any childish games (at least before you suggested that brilliant idea)? --Good Will Hunting (talk) 06:48, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
If local users want to try to convince someone who wants to resign to change his mind, that is of course a very good thing. But if the user comes back to insist to lose his rights (which he didn't do here, to be clear), what I said applies. --MF-W 01:12, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
I would add: no one was suggesting a time period in such a situation as short as the ordinary 24 hours for routine resignation of user rights. We're talking here about a situation where (a) resignation has been requested, then (b) stewards are told that local sysops and 'crats are trying to address issues, then (c) a reasonable period has passed to allow for the possibility of both (i) getting the local issues addressed and (ii) letting the resigning user have a chance to cool down and change his/her mind; yet (d) the user still wants to resign, and the local bureaucrat refuses. That's a problem. Assuming the period for (c) is at least one week, I think a steward is entirely justified in fulfilling the user's request to resign.
I reiterate what MF-W just said: part of the discussion has been a more general discussion. In this specific case, the user did not come back to insist on resigning, and the stewards properly did not act. StevenJ81 (talk) 16:33, 20 August 2018 (UTC)

User [email protected]

Status:    Done

Please remove admin status. Lucas has been already informed and thanked for his work. Thank you. --Aplasia (talk) 07:49, 22 August 2018 (UTC)

Done. — regards, Revi 07:58, 22 August 2018 (UTC)

[email protected]

Status:    Done

Could NativeForeigner's Oversight permission please be removed at his request. He will be keeping the Checkuser permission. Thank you, Callanecc (talk) 11:07, 22 August 2018 (UTC)

(Speaking out loud mode: Callanecc in en:WP:ARBCOM, elected in en:WP:ACE2017, certified by 3 stewards.) Done. — regards, Revi 11:39, 22 August 2018 (UTC)
Thanks folks. NativeForeigner (talk) 03:41, 23 August 2018 (UTC)

[email protected]

Status:    Done

Could Snowolf's Oversight permission please be removed at his request. Thank you, Callanecc (talk) 11:26, 22 August 2018 (UTC)

Done. — regards, Revi 11:39, 22 August 2018 (UTC)

Zuzanna Janin@global

Status:    Done

Rights expired. (I'd note that there are no user edits on record, so no point in trying to find out if user needs renewal.) -- StevenJ81 (talk) (clerking) 14:40, 22 August 2018 (UTC)

Moved from SRGP. Request concerns GIPBE rights. --Vogone (talk) 14:46, 22 August 2018 (UTC)
Done. — regards, Revi 14:48, 22 August 2018 (UTC)

[email protected]

Status:    Done

User is inactice since 6 December 2017 (i.e more than 8 months) and inactive in administrative actions (7 actions in the last 3 years! (Including bureaucratic activities) So i submitted this Desysoping & debureaucrating request per local discussion and voting. Please remove his sysop and bureaucrat flag. Kind Regards--مصعب (talk) 22:33, 22 August 2018 (UTC)

Done. Please thank him for his past service. — regards, Revi 09:02, 23 August 2018 (UTC)

[email protected]

Status:    Done

Own request, retiring, I want to remove my bureaucrat rights to prevent abusing rights while my account is compromised. Please keep reviewer rights. Marshmallych 16:38, 23 August 2018 (UTC)

Done – Ajraddatz (talk) 17:04, 23 August 2018 (UTC)

[email protected]

Status:    Done

Please remove my sysop rights on nl.wikipedia. Thank you. MoiraMoira (talk) 16:44, 27 August 2018 (UTC)

Please put this request on hold for 24 hours, as it was made under emotional circumstances in the midst of a desysopping process. ErikvanB (talk) 18:20, 27 August 2018 (UTC)
A desysop which is not succesfull. If you, MoiraMoira, will keep this, much more work will go to other mods. Much of your work is unfamilliar to others, you'll create a huge (knowledge)gap. I can only see lots of trouble if you stick to your request. Dqfn13 (talk) 18:46, 27 August 2018 (UTC)
This desysop is still running. A still running desysop is not "not succesfull". The Banner (talk) 18:58, 27 August 2018 (UTC)
And given the current voting ratio and the amount of time left to vote, it's unlikely it won't be "succesfull". Jeroen N (talk) 19:17, 27 August 2018 (UTC)
No reason to explain the desysop vote here, so please refrain from further comments. This request will be on hold until at least 22:00 (UTC). Trijnsteltalk 19:34, 27 August 2018 (UTC)
Actually it should be held for 24 hours per the usual practices. — regards, Revi 19:43, 27 August 2018 (UTC)
Doesn't the 24 hour period only apply to self-requests? The community has now voted to revoke MoiraMoira's sysop rights (see [3] – according to our policy, a sysop needs to have the trust of at least 75% of the community, whereas MoiraMoira has 72,5%). Jeroen N (talk) 22:46, 27 August 2018 (UTC)
Please don't make a big fuzz out of this. It's not like there is a huge urgency with this implementation. Leave it to the stewards. Effeietsanders (talk) 00:27, 28 August 2018 (UTC)
  • This page is not intended to host discussions surrounding local conflicts. Please refrain from further comments. I will keep her request  On hold until 22:00, 28 August 2018 (UTC). Thanks, RadiX∞ 03:21, 28 August 2018 (UTC)
Communicity consensus: https://nl.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Afzetting_moderatoren Where does the policy say that a user that has its rights removed by the community can keep her rights for 24 hours by stewards decission? 62.140.137.83 04:53, 28 August 2018 (UTC)
If there is local consensus to demote, someone from nlwiki (preferably locally trusted) should make a new section with the link to the desysop request. Until then this is treated as self-removal request. — regards, Revi 07:19, 28 August 2018 (UTC)
[email protected] (2)

As per the results of this desysop and the remark of Revi above, I ask the stewards to fulfil the expressed will of the Dutch community. Thanks for doing so, RonnieV (talk) 08:42, 28 August 2018 (UTC)

And done. — regards, Revi 08:49, 28 August 2018 (UTC)

[email protected]

Status:    Done

Due to our policy, I hereby request removal of administrator access due to lack of administrative actions during a 1 year period. Nedops (talk) 12:02, 28 August 2018 (UTC)

Done Ruslik (talk) 20:59, 29 August 2018 (UTC)

Multiple users @plwikimedia

Status:    Done

Additionally, the following user accounts ought to have their bureaucrat access removed

I would like to thank the users who are about to have their userrights removed for their work on the chapter wiki, hope to see them there still. Wojciech Pędzich (WMPL) (talk) 18:12, 29 August 2018 (UTC)

Done. Trijnsteltalk 19:08, 29 August 2018 (UTC)

John Vandenberg@oldwikisource

Status:    Done

Please revoke John Vandenberg's administrator access due to inactivity. --OosWesThoesBes (talk) 09:57, 30 August 2018 (UTC)

Done Ruslik (talk) 20:01, 30 August 2018 (UTC)

Temporary permissions (expired and rejected requests only)

Clerking note. All items archived here from SRAT were checked for the expiration, removal or extension of rights before archival. The expiration, removal or extension may not be explicitly indicated below. StevenJ81 (talk) 18:47, 17 August 2018 (UTC)

Sajmĉ[email protected]

Status:    Done

We would like Sajmĉjo to be administrator. He won the voting 4-0. --Chabi (talk) 10:23, 1 May 2018 (UTC)

Given that this is the initial batch of administrators I suggest to grant temporary adminship for 3/6 months and see how it goes. —MarcoAurelio (talk) 10:40, 1 May 2018 (UTC)
This user was not a test-sysop at Incubator, so I think 3 months would probably be a good start. StevenJ81 (talk) 16:45, 1 May 2018 (UTC)
Done Granted for 3 months to expire on 2018-08-01. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. —MarcoAurelio (talk) 17:34, 1 May 2018 (UTC)

Midleading@zhwikisource

Status:    Done

I have passed RfA voting and get 4 support votes. I can become a permanent Administrators. Midleading (talk) 11:33, 1 February 2018 (UTC)

Done Granted for 6 months to expire on 2018-08-02. Ruslik (talk) 20:56, 2 February 2018 (UTC)

Anoop Rao@knwikipedia

Status:    Done

Only one active admin on wiki at this time. ★ Anoop / ಅನೂಪ್ ✉ © 16:18, 22 January 2018 (UTC)

You should make a request on the local RfA page requesting local adminship on knwiki, not on a bunch of wikis. This wiki has a local bureaucrat, please try to contact them, if (s)he doesn't reply in a while, we can act. Matiia (talk) 17:19, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
@ Matiia last bureaucrat edited wiki was on 2015 w:kn:ವಿಶೇಷ:Contributions/HPNadig . i will make a request on L RFA page. ★ Anoop / ಅನೂಪ್ ✉ © 04:03, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
I know, but he can still come back and handle your request. If (s)he doesn't reply in a few days, we'll grant you admin access in case there's no objections. Matiia (talk) 18:06, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
I just sent an email to the bureaucrat, and if we don't get any answer for say 3 days we can proceed with the request. Stryn (talk) 20:48, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
Done Granted for 6 months to expire on 2018-08-03. -- Stryn (talk) 13:59, 3 February 2018 (UTC)

[email protected]

Status:    Done

@Mahir256: requested adminship on 28 January, 2017 and the result is 3 supports with no oppose or neutral votes till date. Bodhisattwa (talk) 13:12, 7 February 2018 (UTC)

Done Granted for 6 months to expire on 2018-08-07. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. Ruslik (talk) 19:45, 7 February 2018 (UTC)

[email protected]

Status:    Done
Helmoony is a highly trusted, he asked for (Permanent adminship), because he leads now a project to develop ar.wikinews --Alaa :)..! 22:24, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
We can't grant them permanent adminship as arwikinews has a small active community. Matiia (talk) 02:25, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
@Matiia: so for 1 year please. Thanks in advance --Alaa :)..! 09:49, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
Done Granted for 6 months to expire on 2018-08-09. --MF-W 14:29, 9 February 2018 (UTC)

[email protected]

Status:    Done

Hi, could you please give me admin access? Cheers.--Surprizi (talk) 17:40, 8 May 2018 (UTC)

Done Granted for 3 months to expire on 2018-08-10. -- --Alaa :)..! 15:28, 10 May 2018 (UTC)

[email protected]

Status:    Done

I have been administering pt.wikivoyage for a year (and en.wikivoyage for much longer than that, for the record). My adminship has expired; I want to apply for renewal. Ibaman (talk) 14:44, 2 August 2017 (UTC)

 On hold till 9 August 2017. Ruslik (talk) 19:40, 2 August 2017 (UTC)
Done Granted for 1 year to expire on 2018-08-10. --MF-W 06:07, 10 August 2017 (UTC)

[email protected]

Status:    Done

We already had a voting for several users to become administrators and none of them have been granted any rights. Can anybody give Cgboeree administrator rights please? --Chabi (talk) 20:52, 10 May 2018 (UTC)

Done Granted for 3 months to expire on 2018-08-11. -- --Alaa :)..! 11:41, 11 May 2018 (UTC)

WAN233@zh-classical wikipedia

Status:    Done

I have been the admin of Classical Chinese wikipedia for 3 months. During this time I dealted with vandalism and did jobs to help this wiki develop. The local announcement is made today. Thank you very much. WAN233 (talk) 06:01, 7 January 2018 (UTC)

 On hold until 13 February 2018 Ruslik (talk) 19:44, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
Your adminship actually runs until 13 February. Ruslik (talk) 20:00, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
OK,I understand.--WAN233 (talk) 13:58, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
Done Granted for 6 months to expire on 2018-08-13. Ruslik (talk) 19:51, 13 February 2018 (UTC)

Dr. Rajwinder [email protected]

Status:    Done

(I have been working on the Punjabi Wiktionary project for a long time. Which is being done online and offline. In addition to creating some bot applications, a comprehensive database of Punjabi Wiktionary is being developed. The Punjabi Wiktionary is edited on 1852 and wikimedia commons has 2604 edits. My second term is expiring on 09/08/2017. I nominate myself to be a permanent administrator.) --Dr. Rajwinder Singh (talk) 07:55, 9 August 2017 (UTC)

@Dr. Rajwinder Singh: this is a "Removal of access" section. Stryn (talk) 08:29, 9 August 2017 (UTC) moved. Stryn (talk) 17:41, 11 August 2017 (UTC)
Done Granted for 1 year to expire on 2018-08-15. -- Stryn (talk) 15:04, 15 August 2017 (UTC)

स@hi.wikibooks

Status:    Done

One Week has passed. Please give him sysop right.--Jayprakash >>> Talk 04:09, 17 February 2018 (UTC)

Done Granted for 6 months to expire on 2018-08-18. – Ajraddatz (talk) 17:51, 18 February 2018 (UTC)

[email protected]

Status:    Done

Please approve this request noting that it is possible that only 5 or 6 people will see, and less will respond to my notice. There is very little in the form of community here. — The preceding unsigned comment was added by CRC43 (talk)

 On hold until 6 May --Alaa :)..! 10:37, 29 April 2018 (UTC)
@Glacious: the local bureaucrat. @CRC43: I know that the local bureaucrat inactive since 4 months, but please send a notification in Glacious talk page, to see, may respond?! --Alaa :)..! 13:20, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
done CRC43 (talk) 04:23, 10 May 2018 (UTC)

No response from the local bureaucrat since more than 7 days, and he is inactive since 4 months. Done Granted for 3 months to expire on 2018-08-19. -- --Alaa :)..! 14:53, 19 May 2018 (UTC)

أحمد ناجي@arwiktionary

Status:    Done

I request for being admin (For 6 months) at ar Wiktionary and I have 6 votes. Ahmed Najji Talk 19:21, 22 February 2018 (UTC)

Done Granted for 6 months to expire on 2018-08-22. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. Ruslik (talk) 20:23, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
@Ruslik0: Thanks. Ahmed Najji Talk 11:52, 23 February 2018 (UTC)

[email protected]

Status:    Done

ShiminUfesoj (talk) 17:42, 23 May 2018 (UTC)

Done Granted for 3 months to expire on 2018-08-23. -- --Alaa :)..! 18:10, 23 May 2018 (UTC)

Thank you very much, it is a such a great help to improve my home wiki Philippines ShiminUfesoj Philippines 18:17, 23 May 2018 (UTC)

स@hiwikivoyage

Status:    Done

--स (talk) 18:13, 24 February 2018 (UTC)

Done Granted for 6 months to expire on 2018-08-24. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. MBisanz talk 19:21, 24 February 2018 (UTC)

[email protected]

Status:    Done

— The preceding unsigned comment was added by Chabi (talk)

Done Granted for 3 months to expire on 2018-08-24. -- --Alaa :)..! 13:00, 24 May 2018 (UTC)

[email protected]

Status:    Done

Ringer (talk)Ringer (talk) 04:53, 24 May 2018 (UTC)

Done Granted for 3 months to expire on 2018-08-24. -- --Alaa :)..! 12:58, 24 May 2018 (UTC)

ruthven@napwiki

Status:    Done

Small wiki with only one sysop. A couple of more hands can be useful (especially to fight vandalism). Thanks Ruthven (msg) 13:47, 27 May 2018 (UTC)

Done Granted for 3 months to expire on 2018-08-27. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. -- Stryn (talk) 15:49, 27 May 2018 (UTC)

[email protected]

Status:    Done

The project needs new blood, because existing admins seems dead.--JTs (talk) 21:11, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

Done Granted for 3 months to expire on 2018-08-30. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. Ruslik (talk) 18:10, 30 May 2018 (UTC)

[email protected]

Status:    Done

Please grant him the temporary adminship for short period. J.Wong 09:52, 31 May 2018 (UTC)

Done Granted for 3 months to expire on 2018-08-31. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. — regards, Revi 13:12, 31 May 2018 (UTC)

Miscellaneous requests

Retrieved from "https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Steward_requests/Permissions/2018-08&oldid=24907974"