Jump to content

Steward requests/Permissions/2017-12

Add links
From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki

Administrator access

[email protected]

Status:    Not done

For permanent... Thanks! --►Cekli829 20:08, 17 October 2017 (UTC)

At least 15 voters out of 19 aren't actually active at az.wikibooks. So, there's no room for permanent adminship. I'm also doubtful about a temporary one because of your recent sysop abuse at az.wiki. --Vituzzu (talk) 20:20, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
İdarəçilik səlahiyyətimdən sui-istifadə məsələlərindən söhbət belə gedə bilməz. Kimlərsə narazıdırlarsa, onlar AzVikinin lokal xüsusiyyətlərinə bələd olmayan istifadəçilərdir. Sui-istifadə ilə bağlı məsələləri ötən dəfə də əsaslandırmışdım. Bloklanmış istifadəçinin blokunu isə sırf Sizə görə açdım. "az.wikibooks"da istifadəçilərin aktiv olmaması isə çox normal bir haldır. Çünki heç kəsi bu layihəyə məcbur cəlb edə bilmərik. Amma qeyd edim ki, səs verən istifadəçilər digər vikilayihələrdə kifayət qədər aktivdir. --►Cekli829 05:30, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
Blocking someone only because they find a copyright violation by you is a clear abuse, worth even desysopping IMHO. --Vituzzu (talk) 07:10, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
Axı müəlliflik hüquqlarının pozulmasından söhbət belə gedə bilməz. Müvafiq qurum öz razılığını hətta məktub şəklində də mənə göndərmişdir. --►Cekli829 11:24, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
Apart from the matter (in which you're anyway wrong) the block you made was an abuse. --Vituzzu (talk) 13:08, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
Mən bloklama səbəbini Sizə izah etmişdim. Səbəb qeyd olunan məsələlərdən qaynaqlansa da, onu bloklamağıma səbəb bilavasitə onun məni vandalizmdə ittiham etməsi olmuşdur. Bəlkə Sizə bloklama müddəti uzun görünə bilər, mən də elə ona görə kifayət qədər vaxt keçdikdən sonra, həm də Sizin tələbinizə uyğun olaraq onun bloku açdım. Amma nəzərinizə çatdırım ki, AzVikidə hazırda qüvvədə olan Bloklama qaydalarına görə "Bloklama müddəti idarəçi tərəfindən sərbəst olaraq təyin edilir." --►Cekli829 13:45, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
Dear Vituzzu, in azwikibooks very few active users. And Cekli is one of them. In the voting of Araz Yaguboglu many of the voters also were not active users in azwikibooks. You give him sysop status. These users are mostly active in azwikipedia. To support our projects outside azwikipedia, we thus choose administrators there. Cekli was elected. You can give him sysop status in azwikibooks. With best regards: --Sortilegus (talk) 19:01, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
Yep, Araz Yaguboglu has no records of sysop abuse, while votes were definitely insufficient for permanent adminship they were for a temporary one. --Vituzzu (talk) 17:20, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
Səsvermə nəticələrinin qəbul olunması üçün nə qədər zamana ehtiyac var? --►Cekli829 18:15, 28 October 2017 (UTC)
Sualımı təkrar vermək istəyirəm: Səsvermə nəticələrinin qəbul olunması üçün nə qədər zamana ehtiyac var? --►Cekli829 18:25, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
Closed as Not done --Vituzzu (talk) 16:43, 6 December 2017 (UTC)

Pbsouthwood@wikimania2018wiki

Status:    Done

I am the local chapter organising committee member responsible for the Wikimania 2018 website. As such I will probably need admin access until after Wikimania 2018. Currently admin on English Wikivoysge. · · · Peter (Southwood) (talk): 11:00, 9 December 2017 (UTC)

@Pbsouthwood: Done, best regards. —MarcoAurelio (talk) 11:12, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
Thanks, · · · Peter (Southwood) (talk): 11:31, 9 December 2017 (UTC)

User AKA_MBG@ruwikiversity

Status:    Done

Permanent adminship requested.

There are 10 support votes. + 5 support votes in the section Questions, which were not counted because they (5 editors) are my students in Petrozavodsk State University. See my last report about our work with students at GLAM: WikiProjects of students of Petrozavodsk State University.

There are two admins in Russian Wikiversity. But only one admin visited our project during last year (not very often, at my sorrow). There is a lot of admin's work to be done in this project. Andrew Krizhanovsky (talk) 17:32, 9 December 2017 (UTC)

Done Ruslik (talk) 19:00, 9 December 2017 (UTC)

Stalinjeet [email protected]

Status:    Done

I want temporary Adminship. Stalinjeet Brar (talk) 15:52, 7 December 2017 (UTC)

 On hold till 10 December 2017. Ruslik (talk) 19:34, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
Done Ruslik (talk) 18:36, 11 December 2017 (UTC)

Keete_37@azwiki

Status:    Not done

Keete 37 was elected as the sysop. However, the rules were distorted, It was alleged that Keete 37 was not elected in the election. Keete 37 protested. White Demon wrote that Keete 37 was elected in the election. Baskervill wrote that Keete 37 was elected in the election. But that was not taken into account. The questions were not answered. Exact comments have been deleted 1, 2, 3, Al.xonder was blocked because he wrote a comment. 3, Aydinsalis was blocked because he wrote a comment. I told my opinion, so they blocked me. Others have also been blocked, so no one can say the truth. Please make a decision. Çim Çen In (talk) 10:03, 9 December 2017 (UTC)

Hello, Keete 37 is not an admin so we can't remove the admin rights. Stryn (talk) 12:06, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
+ I think this is a community dispute that should be solved by using its local venues or RFC. Suggest closing as declined, referring to local venues or RFC. —MarcoAurelio (talk) 12:22, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
This was discussed 2 times. But as I mentioned, they hindered the debate. The questions remained unanswered. The people who asked questions were blocked. We will not have normal discussions. If a new discussion is required, let's discuss again, if you want it. Give quarantine that the participants will not be blocked. Or, check the discussion. Çim Çen In (talk) 12:53, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
MarcoAurelio, I do not protest. I did as you said: Requests for comment/Administrator access (Keete 37). I Suggest closing as declined. But I do not believe that there will be a result. Thanks. Çim Çen In (talk) 13:21, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
Not done, per discussion. Stryn (talk) 17:36, 19 December 2017 (UTC)

[email protected]

Status:    Not done

Burada Vituzzu haqsızlıq edib. Yenidən baxılmasını tələb edirəm. Səsvermədə 19 dəstək, sadəcə 1 əleyhinə səs olub. Vituzzunun Not done etməsinin heç bir əsası yoxdur. Mənim vikikitabda əvvəlki idarəçilik fəaliyyətim dövründə heç bir problem yaşanmamışdır. --►Cekli829 07:40, 15 December 2017 (UTC)

@Cekli829: your activity in the Wikimedia projects is a problem. I have complained about your actions above. But you did not participate in the discussion: Requests for comment/Administrator access (Keete 37). Why do not you want to prove you're right? Justice is a good thing. But how much wrong have you done? Çim Çen In (talk) 10:39, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
@Çim Çen In, Sizin Vikipediyada aktiv fəaliyyətiniz yoxdur. Güvənilə biləcək, etibarlı istifadəçi deyilsiniz. Aydın məsələdir ki, Siz qlobal bloklanmış Aydinsalisin maraqlarına uyğun müzakirələr aparmağa çalışırsınız. Vikipediyanın işini pozan belə müzakirələrdə iştirak etmək isə heç məqsədəuyğun deyil. --►Cekli829 07:31, 19 December 2017 (UTC)
@Cekli829: Keete 37 was elected as the sysop. However, the rules were distorted, It was alleged that Keete 37 was not elected in the election. You have an exceptional role in this work. Now, please prove that this is not a fraud. Aydinsalis was blocked because he wrote a comment. You insulted him. You threatened to arrest him. In fact, you were supposed to be global blocked. But you have deceived META. You have provided false information. Çim Çen In (talk) 16:57, 19 December 2017 (UTC)
Not done. It was already declined and nothing changed since then. Stryn (talk) 17:37, 19 December 2017 (UTC)

Pavliukdanila@ruwikibooks

Status:    Not done

Please give me the admin flag on a temporary basis for innovations in Wikibooks. This project is nearly idle, and there is only one admin, so vote for the issuance of the flag no one. The remaining the administrator does not want to give anyone any flag. Under his leadership, the Wikibooks does not develop. September was not created by any article in this wiki, there is no documentation, no normal bots, forums to improve not created. On the talk page I cited what you want to improve. Also, there was no written new documentation for discussion for the issue of the flag. It would be possible to apply for the closure of the wiki, but still not potranno. I want to draw at least a small number of participants and that at least was a small community. Flag is required for a temporary period: 3-4 months. For what? - In order to try to restore the wiki to improve it, because right now it is just abandoned and is in the power of one administrator --Pavliukdanila (talk) 13:26, 19 December 2017 (UTC)

Unfortunately we can't grant you the admin flag because there is one oppose vote and no support votes at all. Stryn (talk) 17:39, 19 December 2017 (UTC)
@Stryn, In this project, no community, then vote no one. There is only one active participant (administrator), who opposes, in order to remain one administrator.--Pavliukdanila (talk) 23:52, 19 December 2017 (UTC)
We can keep this on hold until 25 December, but there are already 3 oppose votes. Stryn (talk) 10:00, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
Then let's close the topic, refuse to flag --Pavliukdanila (talk) 10:39, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
Not done. Stryn (talk) 13:13, 20 December 2017 (UTC)

User Rzuwig@wikimania2018wiki

Status:    Done

I would like to request for sysop & TA flag. I want to help translate and marking pages for translation. I am administrator on plwiki, wikidata. Also I was sysop on wm2015 and wm2017. Rzuwig► 13:11, 20 December 2017 (UTC)

Done. Stryn (talk) 13:16, 20 December 2017 (UTC)

BukhariSaeed@urwikibooks

Status:    Done

I need sysop rights for few days to delete these kind of pages.--Bukhari Talk 11:54, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

Your two indefinite blocks require some explanation. Ruslik (talk) 18:28, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
Both because of edit waring and sock puppetry (that was my initial time).--Bukhari Talk 19:09, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
@BukhariSaeed: Done for 14 days. Ruslik (talk) 19:11, 23 December 2017 (UTC)

AlvaroMolina@wikimania2018wiki

Status:    Done

Hi, I would like to request administrator and translation administrator permissions on the Wikimania 2018 wiki to help with maintenance and help with bookmarking for translation. Thanks. —Alvaro Molina (✉ - ✔) 15:57, 20 December 2017 (UTC)

 On hold till 27 December 2017. Ruslik (talk) 18:06, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
Done Ruslik (talk) 19:06, 27 December 2017 (UTC)

محمد9088@arzwiki

Status:    Not done

(your remarks) I want requests adminstrator محمد9088 (talk) 17:12, 26 December 2017 (UTC)

Pestering multiple stewards about giving you local administrator rights isn't going to make them grant it to you. Especially when your discussion link goes to your user page instead of actual discussion. --Wiki13 talk 17:18, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
You should ask arz:user:Ghaly, who is a bureaucrat, to grant you this permission. Ruslik (talk) 18:35, 26 December 2017 (UTC)

@Ruslik0: I need requets adminstrator and This User Ghaly Stoper--محمد9088 (talk) 20:46, 26 December 2017 (UTC)

Comment Comment note this requests 1 2 3 4 --Alaa :)..! 20:05, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
Not done Since there is an active bureaucrat you should ask them. Ruslik (talk) 20:29, 29 December 2017 (UTC)


Bureaucrat access

محمد9088@arwiktionary

Status:    Not done

(your remarks) محمد9088 (talk) 12:42, 27 December 2017 (UTC) HI I need Request Bureaucrat and D'ont Bureaucrats in Arabic Wiktionary--محمد9088 (talk) 12:42, 27 December 2017 (UTC)

I suppose you don't. But you need to first start a local request anyway. --MF-W 14:49, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
You've been blocked before on ar.wiktionary (as an editor there, I know)--possibly for this type of hat collecting. I wouldn't recommend adminship or bureaucrat rights at this time. --Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 15:53, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
Not done. Read the instructions. Stryn (talk) 19:44, 27 December 2017 (UTC)

CheckUser access

Martin Urbanec@cswiki

Status:    Done

48 support, 12 against = 80%. JAn Dudík (talk) 20:51, 6 December 2017 (UTC)

Comment Comment Email send to Martin Urbanec wrt info needed for cu-l/cu wiki, waiting for a reply. Trijnsteltalk 23:02, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
I've replied, but I'll re-post it publicly. My mail's [email protected], IRC nick@freenode is Urbanecm, IRC cloak@freenode is wikimedia/Martin-Urbanec. By the way, such info is on my user-page ;). Best, --Martin Urbanec (talk) 12:07, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
 On hold pending discussion. Trijnsteltalk 17:55, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
Done. I've talked to Katherine and she personally approves pursuant the Board resolution on policy making of 2016. —MarcoAurelio (talk) 06:02, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
@MarcoAurelio: Thanks a lot! How can I access the checkuser wiki and #wikimedia-privacy/#wikimedia-checkuser at IRC? All required info should be above. Best, --Martin Urbanec (talk) 10:55, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
Easy: wait until I give you access. ;-) Now Done as well. Welcome email etc are on the way. Trijnsteltalk 22:01, 12 December 2017 (UTC)

[email protected]

Status:    Done
Translation of User Elph message: "Hello Alaa, I hope you are fine. After a little period I come back, so please return all my flags again (Sysop, Bureaucrat, CU). There's no solution to Wikipediholism. Thanks" --Alaa :)..! 14:59, 14 December 2017 (UTC)
 On hold pending discussion. RadiX∞ 02:05, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
Why it needs so long time to be done?--Abbas 06:21, 17 December 2017 (UTC)
Done, but please think about it better before you ask for removal. It costs us a lot of work - think about removal of checkuser-l etc - only to see that you request restoration of the rights only five(!) days after your 'wikibreak'. So next time it's possible we might not be so nice to you. Trijnsteltalk 19:04, 17 December 2017 (UTC)

Alex Shih@enwikipedia

Status:    Done

Newly elected enwiki arbitrator, confidentiality agreement. Callanecc (talk) 04:08, 23 December 2017 (UTC)

All done. RadiX∞ 03:20, 24 December 2017 (UTC)

Premeditated Chaos@enwikipedia

Status:    Done

Newly elected enwiki arbitrator, confidentiality agreement. Callanecc (talk) 04:08, 23 December 2017 (UTC)

All done. RadiX∞ 03:20, 24 December 2017 (UTC)

RickinBaltimore@enwikipedia

Status:    Done

Newly elected enwiki arbitrator, confidentiality agreement. Callanecc (talk) 04:08, 23 December 2017 (UTC)

All done. RadiX∞ 03:20, 24 December 2017 (UTC)

Worm That Turned@enwikipedia

Status:    Done

Newly elected enwiki arbitrator, confidentiality agreement. Callanecc (talk) 04:08, 23 December 2017 (UTC)

All done. RadiX∞ 03:20, 24 December 2017 (UTC)

جار الله@arwiki

Status:    Done

--Alaa :)..! 17:07, 29 December 2017 (UTC)

@جار الله: Please sign the confidentiality agreement --Alaa :)..! 17:18, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
Done.--جار الله (talk) 18:52, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
@جار الله: I've send you an email, please take a look at it & reply. Trijnsteltalk 22:52, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
@جار الله: James told me you probably signed the wrong agreement (OTRS). You need to sign the "General confidentiality agreement for nonpublic information" (see point two of the steps to follow on the how-to-page, the first agreement). So please try again and then come back to us. Thank you. Trijnsteltalk 23:58, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
@Trijnstel: Now i signed "General confidentiality agreement for nonpublic information", thank you.--جار الله (talk) 08:27, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Comment Comment @Trijnstel:Diff. --Alaa :)..! 10:32, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
All Done now. Congrats and good luck with the buttons! Trijnsteltalk 11:09, 31 December 2017 (UTC)

Oversight access

Alex Shih@enwikipedia

Status:    Done

Newly elected enwiki arbitrator, confidentiality agreement. Callanecc (talk) 04:09, 23 December 2017 (UTC)

All done. RadiX∞ 03:21, 24 December 2017 (UTC)

BU Rob13@enwikipedia

Status:    Done

Newly elected enwiki arbitrator, confidentiality agreement. Callanecc (talk) 04:09, 23 December 2017 (UTC)

All done. RadiX∞ 03:21, 24 December 2017 (UTC)

Premeditated Chaos@enwikipedia

Status:    Done

Newly elected enwiki arbitrator, confidentiality agreement. Callanecc (talk) 04:09, 23 December 2017 (UTC)

All done. RadiX∞ 03:21, 24 December 2017 (UTC)

RickinBaltimore@enwikipedia

Status:    Done

Newly elected enwiki arbitrator, confidentiality agreement. Callanecc (talk) 04:09, 23 December 2017 (UTC)

All done. RadiX∞ 03:21, 24 December 2017 (UTC)

Worm That Turned@enwikipedia

Status:    Done

Newly elected enwiki arbitrator, confidentiality agreement. Callanecc (talk) 04:09, 23 December 2017 (UTC)

All done. RadiX∞ 03:21, 24 December 2017 (UTC)

Removal of access

GrafZahl@enwikisource

Status:    Done

Please remove sysop bit; GrafZahl failed confirmation due to inactivity. Hesperian 01:33, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

Done. Thanks for his/her service. RadiX∞ 02:41, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

TalBot@enwikisource

Status:    Done

TalBot is GrafZahl's admin bot; please remove both sysop flag and bot flag. Hesperian 01:33, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

Done for admin status. The bot flag should be handled locally. RadiX∞ 02:43, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Roger that, thank you. Hesperian 06:26, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

Fomafix@wikidatawiki

Status:    Done

Fomafix has not made the required 5 admin actions in the last 6 months. Please remove sysop. Rschen7754 02:24, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

Done. Thanks for his/her service. RadiX∞ 02:34, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

OneLittleMouse@ruwiki

Status:    Not done

Please remove sysop and checkuser in no action required. 69.197.162.68 04:20, 2 December 2017 (UTC)

here. 69.197.162.68 04:23, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
Not done. Seems this request comes from a blocked open proxy, while it needs to come from OneLittleMouse himself. Trijnsteltalk 18:56, 2 December 2017 (UTC)

Ziko@dewiki

Status:    Done

Ziko was granted sysop rights only for being member in the arbitration committee of dewiki (Schiedsgericht). His term has ended 30/11/2017. He has not candidated for another term. See timeline of membership in the arbitration committee: https://de.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Schiedsgericht/timeline&action=edit -- Dschungelfan (talk) 14:15, 2 December 2017 (UTC)

No. Btw: German arb-com members get their sysop rights with a fixed ending when granted by a bureaucrat. There is no need to de-sysop them here at Meta. NNW (talk) 17:57, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
Done Ruslik (talk) 17:58, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
@Ruslik0: As I wrote above there is no need for a steward to de-sysop any arb-com member at de:wp. In this case it is even worse as all old members will stay members for a further month. Ziko needs to have his rights. NNW (talk) 18:28, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
I am sorry, I did not notice you comment (it was posted almost at the same time). Any bureaucrat can reinstate it. Ruslik (talk) 18:45, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
Of course they can. I thought you would repair this mistake by yourself. I'll go and ask the crats at de:wp, job creation scheme. NNW (talk) 19:14, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
Rights are back, with fix end like bevore. Thx --Itti (talk) 20:42, 2 December 2017 (UTC)

Legoktm@itwiki

Status:    Done

I was given these rights for testing a bug, I no longer need them. Legoktm (talk) 08:05, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Thanks for your testing services :-) – Ajraddatz (talk) 08:08, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Elph@arWikipedia

Status:    Done
 On hold for 1 day, standard for resignation of advanced permissions. Trijnsteltalk 21:06, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
Done. —MarcoAurelio (talk) 20:18, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
Thank you. --Abbas 22:17, 9 December 2017 (UTC)

Patchfinder@dawiki

Status:    Done

No edits since May 1, 2017 and no logged actions since April 30, 2017. User notified November 8, 2017, Please remove sysop flag. Christian Giersing (talk) 12:38, 10 December 2017 (UTC)

Done. -- Mentifisto 16:12, 10 December 2017 (UTC)

श्रीहरि@mrwiki

Status:    Done

No edits since 4 August 2010 and no logged actions since 6 December 2007. User notified November 12, 2017, Therefore requesting for the removal of sysop flag Tiven2240 (talk) 08:57, 11 December 2017 (UTC)

I am an admin and 'crat on w:mr. I have confirmed the above and request de-sysop'ing of user श्रीहरी.
Thanks.
अभय नातू (talk) 16:00, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
Done Ruslik (talk) 18:11, 12 December 2017 (UTC)

NordNordWest@commons

Status:    Done

I think five years as a sysop are enough. Please remove my sysop flag. NNW (talk) 10:05, 13 December 2017 (UTC)

 On hold for 1 day, standard for resignation of advanced permissions. Defender (talk) 13:50, 13 December 2017 (UTC)
Done. Thank you for your work. RadiX∞ 02:03, 15 December 2017 (UTC)

Messina@dewiki

Status:    Not done

Since globally banned users shouldn't hold rights and the fact that this user has been banned by means of the above RfC I propose that this user's autoreviewed and editor rights be stripped. Thanks Sau226 (talk) 05:45, 15 December 2017 (UTC)

Note: User:Sau226 dewiki sysops are capable of performing this request. — xaosflux Talk 05:51, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
Thank you for the reminder however I do not speak German (unfortunately) and do not want to accidentally use the wrong words on wiki --Sau226 (talk) 09:14, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
The user is locally blocked and global locked. No need to remove the mentioned rights, and also no reason per dewiki policy. --Krd 10:16, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
Not done It is not technically possible for a steward to remove these rights without making themselves a local sysop first. Ruslik (talk) 19:10, 15 December 2017 (UTC)

Basvb@nlwiki

Status:    Done

Dear Stewards, please remove the admin bit from Basvb on nlwiki. Basvb has made less than 250 contributions over the past year. As such he no longer meets the activity guidelines. See also his own edit [4]. Sincerely, nlwiki bureaucrat Taketa (talk) 19:01, 18 December 2017 (UTC)

Done with thanks for his service on nlwiki. RadiX∞ 00:52, 19 December 2017 (UTC)

Matiia@enwikipedia

Status:    Done

The election is over, so the CU rights should be removed. --Rschen7754 00:22, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

Done--Vituzzu (talk) 00:30, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

RadiX@enwikipedia

Status:    Done

The election is over, so the CU rights should be removed. --Rschen7754 00:22, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

Done--Vituzzu (talk) 00:30, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

Shanmugamp7@enwikipedia

Status:    Done

The election is over, so the CU rights should be removed. --Rschen7754 00:22, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

Done--Vituzzu (talk) 00:30, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

Jayprakash12345@hiwikipedia

Status:    Not done

Now I am no longer to patroll. So please remove it. I want to give my most of the time on Wikimedia Phabricator.-Jayprakash >>> Talk 06:36, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

Not done. Please ask locally. Local sysops should take care of this. :) RadiX∞ 01:11, 22 December 2017 (UTC)

Максим Підліснюк@global

Status:    Done
Done Ruslik (talk) 11:56, 24 December 2017 (UTC)

Base@uawikimedia

Status:    Done

Please remove my bureaucrat and administrator flags. According to the Board decision linked only Board and Audit Committee members hold those flags (a specific per-user Board decision can be made to give administrator flag to other user, which is not the case). I wasn't reelected to any of the governing bodies on the AGM we are having now. --Base (talk) 13:23, 24 December 2017 (UTC)

Done ~ Nahid Talk 13:52, 24 December 2017 (UTC)

Звірі@uawikimedia

Status:    Done

Please remove the user's bureaucrat and administrator flags. According to the Board decision linked only Board and Audit Committee members hold those flags (a specific per-user Board decision can be made to give administrator flag to other user, which is not the case). The user wasn't reelected to any of the governing bodies on the AGM we are having now --Base (talk) 13:23, 24 December 2017 (UTC)

Done ~ Nahid Talk 13:52, 24 December 2017 (UTC)

Taras r@uawikimedia

Status:    Done

Please remove the user's bureaucrat and administrator flags. According to the Board decision linked only Board and Audit Committee members hold those flags (a specific per-user Board decision can be made to give administrator flag to other user, which is not the case). The user wasn't reelected to any of the governing bodies on the AGM we are having now --Base (talk) 13:23, 24 December 2017 (UTC)

Done ~ Nahid Talk 13:52, 24 December 2017 (UTC)

Максим Підліснюк@uawikimedia

Status:    Done

Please remove the user's bureaucrat and administrator flags. According to the Board decision linked only Board and Audit Committee members hold those flags (a specific per-user Board decision can be made to give administrator flag to other user, which is not the case). The user wasn't reelected to any of the governing bodies on the AGM we are having now. --Anatoliy (talk) 19:41, 24 December 2017 (UTC)

Done. -- Mentifisto 20:35, 24 December 2017 (UTC)

OneLittleMouse@ruwiki

Status:    Not done

Please remove sysop and checkuser in abusing rights. --77.37.135.26 14:01, 25 December 2017 (UTC)

I'm not a steward, but based on what should it be removed? Unless you have proof that he has abused his rights this request is likely to being denied. --Wiki13 talk 14:07, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
@Wiki13: stewards can rights wikipedia. --77.37.135.26 14:10, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
IP globally blocked. Stryn (talk) 14:21, 25 December 2017 (UTC)

PediAki@arwiki

Status:    Not done

(ملاحظاتكم) PediAki (talk) 15:36, 26 December 2017 (UTC)

@PediAki: you don’t seem to have any rights on arwiki... so what exactly is your request? Trijnsteltalk 23:28, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
@Trijnste: wich right you say... .
Not done - no further context or information provided, nothing to action here. – Ajraddatz (talk) 17:15, 27 December 2017 (UTC)

Magalhã[email protected]

Status:    Done

Conform Activity criterium administrators have to make at least 250 edits in one year to stay administrator. Magalhães does not comply to that criterium any more. Please remove admin bit. The Banner (talk) 14:35, 27 December 2017 (UTC)

Based on that criteria he still has today to make edits or he loses it. Thats because the last 250 edits go back to December 27th, 2016, a year ago. Please put this on hold for atleast a day more. --Wiki13 talk 14:40, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
You better check his edits. Edit number 250 was this one: "27 dec 2016 09:17 (wijz | gesch) (+126) Wikipedia:Wikiproject/Gendergap/100wikiwomen-2016". Dutch time or Irish time, at this hour of the day that is more than a year ago. The Banner (talk) 16:42, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
In such circumstances we usually ask a local bureaucrat (if any) to confirm. --Vituzzu (talk) 17:01, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
(local crat) I'm afraid Wiki13 is misinterpreting our policy. The policy states 250 edits in twelve months, not 250 edits within 12 months and a bit. Natuur12 (talk) 17:19, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
Done - I've removed the sysop bit, with thanks for their past work. – Ajraddatz (talk) 18:11, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
We have always waited until the next day until we removed, so I don't see why that should have been an issue here. And no I'm not misinterpreting that policy, Natuur12. I'm just stating what has always been the case, and I believe the way this has been handled goes against the 'spirit' (if you know what I mean with this) of this policy. I'll rest my case with this said, as what's done is done. --Wiki13 talk 18:52, 27 December 2017 (UTC)

einsbor@global

Status:    Done

Please remove my steward flag. Due to time limitations I am just unable to be as active as I should be. einsbor talk 22:42, 30 December 2017 (UTC)

What the... Can't you think about it for a short while, maybe? Trijnsteltalk 23:00, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Seeing your email I realize you already thought about it. So hereby Done, but I'll miss you as my colleague. Trijnsteltalk 11:25, 31 December 2017 (UTC)

Temporary permissions (expired and rejected requests only)

[email protected]

Status:    Done

Hi, right now in Pashto wiki (ps.wiki) we have just one admin and I think we need more admins, and I suggest Bukti.khan for this admin access, he is very active user in our wiki project.--Ibrahim khashrowdi (talk) 08:47, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

Done Granted for 6 months to expire on 2017-10-04. --MF-W 14:38, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
Removed —MarcoAurelio (talk) 20:39, 9 December 2017 (UTC)

Wikicology@global

Status:    Done

Temporary GIPBE until 22 Nov. – Ajraddatz (talk) 19:39, 13 November 2017 (UTC)

removed Stryn (talk) 19:16, 6 December 2017 (UTC)

Benoit [email protected]

Status:    Done
Hello. Wikipetcia Atikamekw (atj:Otitikowin) just got out from the incubator, where I was a test-admin for several months. StevenJ81 put me sysop on the new wiki (atj:User:Benoit Rochon), which is ending in 3 days. But I would like to know if I can be sysop again for another 6 months, until the new Wiki community gets organized better.
While we are there, we started a vote for new sysops on atj.wp a week ago and there are two persons that are elected: atj:User:Nehirowisiw and atj:User:Bilbo40. Is it possible to grant them at the same time? We plan that I will train them Wednesday 28th. Thank you in advance. Benoit Rochon (talk) 14:04, 26 June 2017 (UTC)
For the record, I did not do that, because I am not a steward and do not have those rights. MF-Warburg did that. StevenJ81 (talk) 14:33, 26 June 2017 (UTC)
Also for the record, User:Nehirowisiw and User:Benoit Rochon were both test-admins on the project at Incubator, so have some experience using the mop. StevenJ81 (talk) 14:40, 26 June 2017 (UTC)
You need to make a request for adminship on the wiki for yourself as well. I created separate section for the other two candidates below. --MF-W 15:38, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
Thank you MF-W. But I don't want to become permanent admin, neither I want to ask the local community to vote on my case. Only thing is that new namespaces just kicked in few hours ago, and there's a lot of cleaning that need to be done... and I only have 2 days left on the initial sysop, would it be possible to extend for at least couple weeks ? Best, Benoit Rochon (talk) 20:43, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
(stalker) @Benoit Rochon: The initial two weeks he gave you were extraordinary; that doesn't usually happen. Maybe MF-W will just give you two more weeks. But I'd encourage you to go through the process, get approbation from the community, keep the mop three months just to get the wiki off on the right foot, and then you don't need to renew the rights when they next come up. StevenJ81 (talk) 14:19, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
Hello MF-W, you can see the request for adminship here: atj:Wikipetcia:Ke nanakatisitc#Benoit Rochon. Also I created separate section for two more local candidates. Thank you. Best Benoit Rochon (talk) 13:58, 5 July 2017 (UTC)

Done Granted for 3 months to expire on 2017-10-05. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. --MF-W 15:01, 5 July 2017 (UTC)

Removed —MarcoAurelio (talk) 06:22, 12 December 2017 (UTC)

DonCamillo@hawiki

Status:    Done

Hello, the Wikipedia in Hausa language doesn't have a user community strictly speaking right now and of course no local permissions procedure. I'm one of the only contributors, working together with Wikimedia Nigeria in order to increase contributions from Hausa speakers, and able to speak basic Hausa. I'm a quite experienced user (19 k+ edits) and was an administrator on fr.wikipedia from 2006 to 2015 (desysoped at my own request). The admin tools would be useful in order to fight vandalism on ha.wikipedia, improve the main page, etc. Thanks for your help. DonCamillo (talk) 10:25, 28 June 2017 (UTC)

Hello. Please post a local announcement on their village pump stating that you intend to become an administrator there. If there's a dedicated request page, please do so there and link your application on the village pump so it is visible. Once you've done so, please link back to us the announcement or the formal request you made there. Thank you. Regards, —MarcoAurelio 12:07, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
Of course! Here is the announcement. Best regards, --DonCamillo (talk) 14:42, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
 On hold until 5 July. Stryn (talk) 16:15, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
Done Granted for 3 months to expire on 2017-10-05. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. -- Stryn (talk) 12:52, 5 July 2017 (UTC)
Extended —MarcoAurelio (talk) 06:22, 12 December 2017 (UTC)

[email protected]

Status:    Done

I'm going to ask for another 3 months to maintain the wiki. No objections in discussion. --Amanojaku (talk) 02:27, 5 July 2017 (UTC)

Done Granted for 3 months to expire on 2017-10-05. -- Stryn (talk) 12:54, 5 July 2017 (UTC)
Removed —MarcoAurelio (talk) 06:23, 12 December 2017 (UTC)

[email protected]

Status:    Done

For extending --Wargo (talk) 11:59, 8 February 2017 (UTC)

Done Granted for 8 months to expire on 2017-10-08. MBisanz talk 12:11, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
Removed —MarcoAurelio (talk) 06:23, 12 December 2017 (UTC)

Gurbakhshish [email protected]

Status:    Done

My adminship rights have ended now and i want to be it permanent. I am one of the active editor of Punjabi Wikipedia and am currently working on Wikipedia and Wikidata. There is lot of Punjabi content to be improved and created on Wikidata. Thank you kindly. Gurbakhshish chand (talk) 06:46, 9 October 2016 (UTC)

Done Granted for 1 year to expire on 2017-10-11. --MF-W 20:58, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
Extended —MarcoAurelio (talk) 06:24, 12 December 2017 (UTC)

स@hiwikibooks

Status:    Done

--स (talk) 14:28, 11 July 2017 (UTC)

Done Granted for 3 months to expire on 2017-10-11. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. ~ Nahid Talk 17:26, 11 July 2017 (UTC)
Removed —MarcoAurelio (talk) 06:24, 12 December 2017 (UTC)

[email protected]

Status:    Done

The community has reached a consensus to extend User:Cobija's term for another six months--Vito Genovese 16:03, 12 April 2017 (UTC)

Done Granted for 6 months to expire on 2017-10-12. -- Stryn (talk) 16:11, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
Removed —MarcoAurelio (talk) 06:25, 12 December 2017 (UTC)

Miscellaneous requests

Geograf22@azwiki

Status:    Not done

Azerifactory is an sysop on Azerbaijani Wikipedia. 'User:Azerifactory' these are shared account. Although there is clear and consistent evidence. He wrote here: I unblocked Garabekir ([5]). Garabekir thanked him for that ([6]). But in fact Baskervill unblocked Garabekir ([7]). Azerifactory wrote a few days also later: " I unblocked Garabekir "([8]) ?! The issue was discussed ([9] and [10]). But Azerifactory can not answer it. He also insulted me ( I don't answer enquiries to socks). This is the level of our managers. They always insult us, then they block us. I think that might be the case: Sefer azeri. There may be others. Can you help clarify this please. Thanks. Geograf22 (talk) 03:42, 30 November 2017 (UTC)

I'm an admin in Azerbaijani wikipedia and Geograf22 is sockpuppet of banned user known as Aydinsalis. Proof https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Aydinsalis --Azerifactory (talk) 07:56, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
Azerifactory, this is not an Azerbaijani Vikipedia. You can not lie here. You need to prove every word that you say. In this link there is no evidence. Here we are talking about you. Do you have any ideas to answer my question? Or again insulting and slander? Geograf22 (talk) 08:26, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
Is there some reason you're so desperate to be blocked? Because anyone with as much experience as you have should know all you're achieving by posting this all over the place is drawing more attention to it ensuring you'll be blocked. Could you not just stay away from all wikimedia projects on your volition? Nil Einne (talk) 02:05, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
@Nil Einne: I tried to answer your questions as best I can: here. Still, there was no answer to my question. That's why I came here. So what else could I do. Who else can answer my question? After the answer, I will explain other things in greater detail. Geograf22 (talk) 07:39, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Not done that's not even a SRP. --Vituzzu (talk) 09:06, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

Xaosflux@testwiki - Importers

Status:    Done

For import testing, I am a current importer on enwiki. — xaosflux Talk 16:06, 20 December 2017 (UTC)

Done. Try to not break anything :-) – Ajraddatz (talk) 06:49, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Steward_requests/Permissions/2017-12&oldid=24950929"