Jump to content

Steward requests/Permissions/2015-06

Add links
From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki

Administrator access

[email protected]

Status:    Not done

Laos wikipedia not have neatness because have troll has editing many article in laos wikipedia and not have admin for manager problem, please appoint me to admin, thank you--Laomonarchrestore (talk) 08:43, 16 May 2015 (UTC)

Please link to where you have posted to your community your wish to undertake admin duties. We would expect there to be at least a week between a nomination and a close to give a community time to respond.  — billinghurst sDrewth 10:26, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
Ok, sir click here--Laomonarchrestore (talk) 05:23, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
  • {{Inprogress}} Discussion should remain open until May 24. -- Avi (talk) 13:57, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
    • I reacted in the village pump there. Although I applaud having a Lao user being admin there; I am afraid the user has barely contributed sofar has not asked in Laotian to become an admin and judging on his username and userpage cannot be expected to be neutral with regards to issues in Laos today. Waerth (talk) 11:53, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
  • I note that no one has responded to his post on that wiki and the only other admin on that wiki has been inactive since 2013. Given the concerns Waerth raises above, I am uncomfortable granting even temporary adminship. MBisanz talk 02:38, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Thank you for all comment, although i have userpage and username that don't neutral but i'll don't have biased for sure, i want wikipedia have neutral about the truth and knowledge for laos people in next days, like many countries in asean (such as thai,myanmar,cambodia,malaysia and vietnam) that using wikipedia for refer in their report and article--Laomonarchrestore (talk) 06:11, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
    • I have proposed that Laomonarchrestore maybe place links to vandalism (and maybe also other requests he has like pagemoves) on a single page and then the stewards can do something for him. Just under the notion of assume good faith as I do not think there is a Lao reading steward. I think I might be the inactive admin on lo.wikipedia but those rights were taken already. Alternatively ask th.wikipedia if they have someone that can read Laotian. The scripts are sorta similar. Someone from the border areas of thailand might be able to read it. Waerth (talk) 10:04, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
      @Waerth and Laomonarchrestore: If there are edits for protected pages required, then they should be discussed on the wiki, and when discussion is complete requests should be added to Steward requests/Miscellaneous (one of purposes of that page and the functions of stewards and global admins).  — billinghurst sDrewth 08:35, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Not done There is enough opposition to the request that affording access to the toolset at this time is not warranted. Issues requiring an administrator should be noted at the Steward/GS request page at Steward requests/Miscellaneous. Thank you for volunteering. -- Avi (talk) 19:06, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

Shibuki [email protected]

Status:    Not done

I'm applying a sysop right on Wiktionary but no b-crats(bureaucrats)there.Last 2 b-crats are revoked by a local voting.--Shibuki 803 (talk) 13:24, 23 May 2015 (UTC)

 on hold, request made to community 23 May, until 30 May  — billinghurst sDrewth 15:13, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
Not done, only comment on RfA is in opposition. Please take that advice and apply later. Ajraddatz (talk) 17:34, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

badr [email protected]

Status:    Not done

(please give me apermanent adminship because the community have voted for me before. and community now is larger than before،AND i like wiktionary, ITS every thing for me and he is help me in my study ، regards Badr alkabir (talk) 18:20, 6 June 2015 (UTC)

 On hold until 12 Jun I would think that we would look to a one year term.  — billinghurst sDrewth 11:10, 7 June 2015 (UTC)
Weird, I don't find RfA or discussion about this on here ar:wikt:ويكاموس:الميدان I've read all section yet still can't find it.--AldNonymousBicara? 18:29, 7 June 2015 (UTC)
i forgot, and put error address, so i'll be back next year nomination, with greetings--Badr alkabir (talk) 16:55, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
Correct link seems to be this one, and per the community voting and your comment marking this as Not done. --Stryn (talk) 17:04, 10 June 2015 (UTC)
OK ((what goes up must come down)) next time, with greetings--Badr alkabir (talk) 18:25, 10 June 2015 (UTC)

Dan Koehl@svvoy

Status:    Not done

As noted on the usertalk, Dans temporary sysop-access expire june 19. It is holiday season in Sweden now and the user tells he is on "Ljusterö" on his userpage. Therefor I propose that you extend his temporary access until a RfA has been filed and we get response from the local crat, a month would probably be enough. -- Innocent bystander (talk) 11:09, 16 June 2015 (UTC)

You have a local 'crat, so please handle this locally. We have already taken action once, and if you elected a 'crat then you have requested to have that responsibility onwiki. Normal processes should follow for stewards, if we have that involvement. If your local 'crat has acted then please let us know so we can remove the requirement to remove the rights.  — billinghurst sDrewth 13:42, 16 June 2015 (UTC)

User Parintar

Status:    Not done
@Parintar: you have to make a local announcement there first. --Stryn (talk) 10:13, 13 June 2015 (UTC)
stale request please resubmit any request after seeking approval of your community.  — billinghurst sDrewth 11:14, 21 June 2015 (UTC)

[email protected]

Status:    Withdrawn

Please give me sysop access for one day, to clean up and fix the interface, thank you. Mjbmr (discussion • contribs) 07:11, 19 June 2015 (UTC)

Given w:en:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mjbmr and the indefinite block on fawiki I'm not sure this is a good idea. --Rschen7754 19:35, 20 June 2015 (UTC)
At the same time, the user has two sysop roles and for which we hear no complaints. @Mjbmr: Please indicate what pages you are wishing to edit, and the types of editing that you are looking to undertake.  — billinghurst sDrewth 11:17, 21 June 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for mentioning that, it's not required anymore. Mjbmr (discussion • contribs) 17:04, 21 June 2015 (UTC)
Request withdrawn per user. MBisanz talk 02:31, 22 June 2015 (UTC)

[email protected]

Status:    Locally handled

We request to evaluate this vote and give admin rights to v:cs:user:Kusurija. Regarding local policy, this is a work for bureaucrat, but 10 days have passed from the end of the vote and nothing is happening. The rule says that the vote could be prolonged if crat thinks it’s needed, but that should be announced. Nothing was announced and according my opinion, there is no need to prolong it.

Local policy call for quorum, i.e. if there are 30+ users who can vote (15 edits in the main ns prior the start of vote - max 90 days back) 20+ makes quorum; if less than 28 users can vote, voters must be 70%+1. This is counted from For/Against/Abstain. Actually, there are 12|0|13 - For|Against|Abstain, which is 25 in total. Two of them Jinxx and Poncrlenka, does not have proper amount of edits, thus there are 23 valid voters voting. For whatever range from 23 to 29 valid voters you got that 23 is more than 70%+1 and for the range of 30+ 23 is more than 20 so this vote is valid.

The policy than sais: if there are 3/4 of votes for candidate from For/Against, candidate was elected. So there are 10 valid votes, 3/4 is 7.5 but the candidate got 10 For so the election was successful for him.--Juandev (talk) 19:05, 24 June 2015 (UTC)

There is a local bureacrat who is active, so we are not authorized to override the local functionary. v:cs:Uživatel:Danny B. should be explicitly asked to handle this or explain why it hasn't been handled yet. -- Avi (talk) 19:33, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Danny B. was gently informed/asked (very gently, because this b'crat/admin tends to block for either gentle impertinence against him, so we wikiversity editors are little afraid of him), but his answer was that "wait to see it done". But we had been waiting for 10 days, but nothing happened, nor was explained. --Kusurija (talk) 20:37, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
If the community believes that DannyB is not fulfilling his duties responsibly, they should locally discuss if there is a consensus to remove his privileges. Our job is to implement community consensus in cases where there isn't any other option. We have to be very careful not to exceed our mandate so that we don't lose the trust of the greater Wikimedia community. I don't know if this is appropriate, but perhaps a local discussion whether there is consensus to treat stewards as local crats under certain conditions may be an idea. -- Avi (talk) 21:28, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Understood.--Juandev (talk) 06:47, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
Task was solved on cs.wikiversity. So this request can be removed. Thanks. --Kusurija (talk) 04:06, 26 June 2015 (UTC)
Marked as locally handled. --Stryn (talk) 05:10, 26 June 2015 (UTC)

Bureaucrat access

[email protected]

Status:    Not done

Stryn I was requesting bero flag but my brother Meno25 told me that its difficult according to the status of arabic wiktionary.Meta don't give bero flag ti temporarry admins.Finally the decision is for meta admins. Regards--1339861mzb (talk) 07:53, 31 May 2015 (UTC)

If I understand that correctly; you were asking of a bureaucrat rights on ar.wiktionary although your temporary adminship will be expired in these days. --Stryn (talk) 19:43, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
yes. Exactly sorry for poor english language. How can i became a permanent admin and have bureaucrat flag. Please help me. With full regards--1339861mzb (talk) 12:36, 1 June 2015 (UTC)
The community is too small for bureaucrats and for permanent admins as well, I would say. If you want to prolong your adminship on the wiki, you should start a request for adminship there. --Stryn (talk) 17:28, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

CheckUser access

[email protected]

Status:    Done

Teles was reelected checkuser in Portuguese Wikipedia for more a one year term. Érico Wouters (msg) 23:40, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

Done. No change is necessary. --MF-W 23:48, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

Oversight access

Leon [email protected]

Status:    Not done

Successful voting. 26 favorable votes and one abstention (100%) Vhaslhv (talk) 18:17, 6 June 2015 (UTC)

All I can see is just 20 support votes.--AldNonymousBicara? 19:06, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
Not done - OS policy requires at least 25 votes in favor. —MarcoAurelio 20:22, 6 June 2015 (UTC)

Leon saudanha@ptwikipedia

Status:    Done

Please, grant Leon saudanha access to Oversight tools on Portuguese Wikipedia. He has been chosen by local community vote (link above), and is already identified to the foundation. Thanks in advance.—Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 01:43, 11 June 2015 (UTC)

Done Thank you for volunteering. -- Avi (talk) 01:56, 11 June 2015 (UTC)

Removal of access

[email protected]

Status:    Not done

Please remove the long-inactive bureaucrat flag. I asked the user on 2015-03-29 with no answer for long time. Jusjih (talk) 01:41, 23 May 2015 (UTC)

Is he not currently active in both editing and at least administrative actions, though? -- Mentifisto 16:27, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
Not anymore after 2015-02-15 [2].--Jusjih (talk) 23:09, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Without a policy to the difference, why would we not be using AAR as the judgment for removal rather than the non-answering of a question?  — billinghurst sDrewth 10:56, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
Not done per Billinghurst. --Vituzzu (talk) 13:58, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

555@wikidatawiki

Status:    Done

This user has not made at least 5 admin actions over the last six months. Please remove administrator rights for inactivity. Rschen7754 00:02, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

Done. -- Mentifisto 00:11, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

Alan ffm@wikidatawiki

Status:    Done

This user has not made at least 5 admin actions over the last six months. Please remove administrator rights for inactivity. Rschen7754 00:02, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

Done. -- Mentifisto 00:11, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

PMG@wikidatawiki

Status:    Done

This user has not made at least 5 admin actions over the last six months. Please remove administrator rights for inactivity. Rschen7754 00:02, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

Done. -- Mentifisto 00:11, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

@[email protected]

Status:    Locally handled

Under en.wp policy, administrators have their bit removed after 1 year of inactivity. @pple fulfils this requirement, but I'm unable to remove the admin bit as a bureaucrat (I think due to the @ in their name). Would a Steward please be able to take care of this? Cheers WormTT 10:20, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

Just try removing user rights via user id. In this case, "#3685614" at en:Special:UserRights. Regards, Vogone (talk) 10:35, 1 June 2015 (UTC)
Service. —DerHexer (Talk) 10:37, 1 June 2015 (UTC)
Now done - didn't know you could do it that way. Thanks for the help. WormTT 12:13, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

[email protected]

Status:    Not done

Good afternoon, I ask immediately take right sypos Jkb and unblock user Auvajs. Jkb block groundless and he write false summary of block. Auvajs only write question. Thank.--Sapiens123456 (talk) 13:49, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

Not done (please please please don't use automatic translators when writing here) you should ask -jkb- and other local sysops to review the block if you believe it's wrong. --Vituzzu (talk) 13:57, 1 June 2015 (UTC)
After having been marked as done and for the record: disturbing and harassing edits on the project like this are extremely high at present - cs wiktionary and cs wikiversity users try to export their conflicts cross wiki to cs wikisource. The user Auvajs has been blocked for continuing sockpuppetting. Two socks are known, I'm waitig for some CU check and will block them all at once. Regards -jkb- 14:51, 1 June 2015 (UTC)
Thats your POV -jkb-. You have block user indef for a question, wheather there is policy regarding admins. Is the CU check transparent?--Juandev (talk) 17:31, 1 June 2015 (UTC)
I have no idea who is this Sapiens123456 and honestly I'd like to know too. -jkb-: you "forgot" to mention one important fact: I have not been blocked for continuing sockpuppetting. I was (see the difference?) blocked for it in 2006 and I admit I really was making lots of troubles back than. However since the Czech Wikipedia ArbCom decided I was allowed one account only I strictly adhered to it for some 7 years and didn't use another account till the ArbCom upheld my ban of creating new user accounts. So I must say your above message is formulated in such a way that it's clearly intended to make me harm which I'm not able to consider any differently than a kind of a personal attack. Please stop with that! Your block on @cs.wikisource is totally inappropriate but more of this soon.--Auvajs (talk) 15:12, 1 June 2015 (UTC)
Just FYI: Sapiens123456 is definitely a prolific sockpuppeteer, I'm running some investigations but I'm already pretty sure of my findings. --Vituzzu (talk) 18:57, 1 June 2015 (UTC)
Do it slowly but properly, we have time. You could find some more. Cheers -jkb- 19:05, 1 June 2015 (UTC)
My IP adres use 100 people. --Sapiens123456 (talk) 19:17, 1 June 2015 (UTC)
Facts: Auvajs has been blocked indef because he (only) asked if there are any rules for sysops at cs.wikisource (here; everything is in Czech of course). -jkb- reacted immediately and said Auvajs had made "subversion of the project, transferring conflicts from project to project, trolling and offensive provocation", so "continuing sockpuppetting" is not true (see at Auvajs´s edit history). That was all. Because at cs.wikisource edit only few people ("Czech world" is small you know) some users discuss this situation at cs.wikipedia (cs:Wikipedie:Pod lípou (sesterské projekty)#Bezprecedentní blokování správcem -jkb- na Wikizdrojích). Many of them are really upset and three of them (including Sapiens123456) ask -jkb- to remove his sysop rights - his reaction? Nothing (cs:s:Diskuse s uživatelem:-jkb-#Výzva). He says he knows two socks but where are they? Nobody knows. Maybe I´m not right but what I can see? The most massive abuse of sysop rights I´ve ever seen (OK, I´ve been wikipedian only for two years). I think that you cannot remove his rights if there is no consent of community at cs.wikisource, and there can´t be something like this, so this statement is made just to be fair. Regards. --Vlout (talk) 18:23, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
"The most massive abuse of sysop rights I´ve ever seen" Yes. I agree with Vlout.(I´ve been wikipedian for seven years). --Martin Kotačka (talk) 06:22, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
What you say may or may not be right. The decision about admin rights is undertaken by the community, not by stewards, so please address your concern to the community csWS for that community's discussion. Plus you all know better than to have the conversation like this on this page. So please have it locally at csWS, or take it to an RFC, this is a drama-free page  — billinghurst sDrewth 11:58, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
See Requests for comment/cs.wikisource admins. --Auvajs (talk) 13:05, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
Link update ^^ following linked page moved to main ns.  — billinghurst sDrewth 13:28, 3 June 2015 (UTC)

[email protected]

Status:    Done

Hello. I am the owner of the bot which runs under SergoBot account. This accaunt was granted with sysop grant to perform some special task. As the task was succesfully finished, I ask for taking sysop flag from my bot's account. Thank you Sergento (talk) 06:48, 4 June 2015 (UTC)

Done, Linedwell (talk) 07:54, 4 June 2015 (UTC)

لا روسا@ar.wikipedia

Status:    Done

Please remove my sysop flag, thank you.--لا روسا (talk) 08:17, 8 June 2015 (UTC)

 On hold until 08:17, 9 June 2015. QuiteUnusual (talk) 10:10, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
Done, einsbor talk 10:00, 9 June 2015 (UTC)

Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry@enwikipedia

Status:    Done

Per this ArbCom decision, please remove the CheckUser and Oversight rights of Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry. For the enwiki Arbitration Committee, --L235 (talk) enwiki 17:41, 9 June 2015 (UTC)

Just in case y'all need it, I confirm this request as a sitting arbitrator. Courcelles 17:48, 9 June 2015 (UTC)
Done. Thanks for their past work. Ajraddatz (talk) 18:11, 9 June 2015 (UTC)

[email protected]

Status:    Done

No bureaucrat logs after 2012-09-26. No answer to my inquiry on 2015-04-29. No other comments to flag removal discussion on 2015-05-22. Jusjih (talk) 00:19, 9 June 2015 (UTC)

Are you requesting only bureaucrat flag removal or sysop as well? Ruslik (talk) 19:25, 9 June 2015 (UTC)
To remove bureaucrat flag only. Thanks.--Jusjih (talk) 20:17, 9 June 2015 (UTC)
Done. Ajraddatz (talk) 07:42, 10 June 2015 (UTC)

[email protected]

Status:    Locally handled

As per the regulations of huwiki, the admin, who is inactive for more than a year, loses his rights. eLVe is inactive for more than a year now, please remove his rights. Burumbátor (talk) 18:03, 9 June 2015 (UTC)

eLVe was active in September 2014. Ruslik (talk) 19:22, 9 June 2015 (UTC)
However there're no admin action since 29 May 2014. @Burumbátor: Please give the link of policy about what is inactivity in huwiki.--GZWDer (talk) 02:56, 10 June 2015 (UTC)
Per w:hu:Speciális:Szerkesztői csoportok jogai, I believe HuWiki bureaucrats can remove admin and crat tags, so this should be handled locally. -- Avi (talk) 04:47, 10 June 2015 (UTC)
Not done per Avi. As much as I dislike it, local bureaucrats are able to desysop/decrat on huwiki, so you should ask any hu:Special:ListUsers/bureaucrat for this. Thanks for your understanding. —MarcoAurelio 10:21, 10 June 2015 (UTC)

[email protected]

Status:    Done

Hi. According to the local policies, Cobalttempest has not enough administrative actions to be a sysop or a 'crat on eswiki. Requerimment is 50 admin actions on past two years. Please remove his both bureaucrat and administrator flags. Thanks. BetoCG (talk) 05:18, 11 June 2015 (UTC)

Done, einsbor talk 12:12, 11 June 2015 (UTC)

User רחל1@hewikipedia

Status:    Done

Please remove my sysop rights. רחל1 (talk) 04:55, 12 June 2015 (UTC)

Done. --Stryn (talk) 05:33, 13 June 2015 (UTC)

[email protected]

Status:    Not done

Hy team. Please remove my admin rights on Armenian Wikipedia. I am very busy now for concentrating on Wikipedia project. Best regards, --Arman musikyan (talk) 07:04, 12 June 2015 (UTC)

 On hold for 24 hours per standard practice. Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 07:28, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Sorry, team. Please don't remove my admin access. My plans have been changed and now I have enough time to work at Armenian Wikipedia as an admin. We have got only 9 admins, who have to look after about 1000 editors'. I need help others. I apologize for my request. Cheers, --Arman musikyan (talk) 19:43, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Not done as the user withdrew their request. --Stryn (talk) 05:34, 13 June 2015 (UTC)
Thanks so much, Stryn --Arman musikyan (talk) 05:35, 13 June 2015 (UTC)

Leinad@plwikipedia

Status:    Done

As per local rules, Leinad's CheckUser rights are to be removed. I see his last checkuser activity on May 27, 2014 which exceeds the 365 day period. Wojciech Pędzich Talk 10:47, 14 June 2015 (UTC)

Done :-( Please thank him for his efforts in a long-held role.  — billinghurst sDrewth 10:57, 14 June 2015 (UTC)

80686@alswikipedia

Status:    Done
Done —MarcoAurelio 13:21, 15 June 2015 (UTC)

tufor@global

Status:    Done

Hello! Please remove my global rollback rights. For some time now I don't have enough time to do cross-wiki work and it's not going to change in following months. The fact I don't use these rights really bother me. I'm sorry guys. Love ya, tufor (talk) 16:33, 13 June 2015 (UTC)

On hold for 24 hours, per standard practice. Ajraddatz (talk) 16:51, 13 June 2015 (UTC)
Done, thanks for your help. --Stryn (talk) 17:07, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
Thanks, Stryn. tufor (talk) 19:11, 14 June 2015 (UTC)

[email protected]

Status:    Not done

As per the regulations of huwiki, the admin, who is inactive for more than a year, loses his rights. eLVe is inactive for more than a year now, please remove his rights. Burumbátor (talk) 18:03, 9 June 2015 (UTC)

eLVe was active in September 2014. Ruslik (talk) 19:22, 9 June 2015 (UTC)
However there're no admin action since 29 May 2014. @Burumbátor: Please give the link of policy about what is inactivity in huwiki.--GZWDer (talk) 02:56, 10 June 2015 (UTC)
Per w:hu:Speciális:Szerkesztői csoportok jogai, I believe HuWiki bureaucrats can remove admin and crat tags, so this should be handled locally. -- Avi (talk) 04:47, 10 June 2015 (UTC)
Please see the removal of access policy on huwiki in case of inactivity. It says, briefly: If admin has NO admin edit for six months, and has less than 10 admin edits for the past 1 year, he loses his rights. We discussed with him, and he is at peace with such development. No huwiki bureaucrat has removed admin rights so far. --Burumbátor (talk) 10:31, 15 June 2015 (UTC)
@Burumbátor, Avraham, GZWDer, and Ruslik0: Not done - When huwiki voted to have their bureaucrats to be able do desysop/debureaucrat, huwiki revoked our ability to perform those actions there unless on emergencies. You'll have to ask huwiki bureaucrats to comply with the policy. We'd like to help, but your community decided to exclude us from this task. This should be handled locally, as much as I dislike bureaucrats being able to remove rights. Thanks for your understanding. —MarcoAurelio 13:34, 15 June 2015 (UTC)
Clear. Thanks for you ever giving consoderation to this matter. --Burumbátor (talk) 18:49, 15 June 2015 (UTC)
No problem. If huwiki ever decides to have steward perform this tasks again we will be glad to do it. Best regards. —MarcoAurelio 22:53, 15 June 2015 (UTC)

Ivan [email protected]

Status:    Not done

Please, remove adminrights this admin. Oleg3280 (talk) 12:38, 15 June 2015 (UTC)

  1. Just to clarify, – while I explicitly refused to oppose filing this request (see 118265), there was no formal discussion of revoking my permissions on the project as of yet.
  2. While Oleg3280 is of course welcome to start such a discussion (on b:ru:Викиучебник:Общий форум), I doubt it will lead to any specific decision being taken given the low activity at the project – both in general, and especially when it comes to project-wide discussions.
  3. Thanks for your consideration. And sorry for the noise.
— Ivan Shmakov (d ▞ c) 13:10, 15 June 2015 (UTC)
Not done. There's neither a resignation from Ivan Shmakov nor a successful request for rights removal on the project. We will not remove rights unless requested to do so by the community or the user by an explicit resignation or an emergency desysop. None of this are met here to the best of my understanding. —MarcoAurelio 13:29, 15 June 2015 (UTC)

Tail@lvwikipedia

Status:    Done

According to a community decision, administrators who have made less than 10 administrative action within the last 6 months are to be notified of the situation. Within the next 3 months, they have to explain their absence and decide whether they want to carry on. Should they fail to do that, their administrative rights are to be removed. Tail was notified of the situation on February 19 and did not respond. SpeedKing (talk) 13:26, 19 June 2015 (UTC)

Done but the bureaucrat flag remains as that wasn't specified (do say if there was consensus anywhere, though) and seems to be ambiguous in the discussions on the voting page too... -- Mentifisto 17:56, 19 June 2015 (UTC)

Yyy@lvwikipedia

Status:    Done

According to a community decision, administrators who have made less than 10 administrative action within the last 6 months are to be notified of the situation. Within the next 3 months, they have to explain their absence and decide whether they want to carry on. Should they fail to do that, their administrative rights are to be removed. Yyy was notified of the situation on February 19 and did not respond. SpeedKing (talk) 13:26, 19 June 2015 (UTC)

Done but the bureaucrat flag remains as that wasn't specified (do say if there was consensus anywhere, though) and seems to be ambiguous in the discussions on the voting page too... -- Mentifisto 17:56, 19 June 2015 (UTC)

Zummis@lvwikipedia

Status:    Done

According to a community decision, administrators who have made less than 10 administrative action within the last 6 months are to be notified of the situation. Within the next 3 months, they have to explain their absence and decide whether they want to carry on. Should they fail to do that, their administrative rights are to be removed. Zummis was notified of the situation on February 6 and did not respond. SpeedKing (talk) 13:26, 19 June 2015 (UTC)

Done. -- Mentifisto 17:56, 19 June 2015 (UTC)

Tail@lvwikipedia

Status:    Done

The first five comments of the community discussion indicate that there was a consensus to treat bureaucrat rights the same way as sysop rights. Please remove Tail's bureaucrat flag. --SpeedKing (talk) 08:08, 21 June 2015 (UTC)

Presumably this is a follow-up to the removal of the admin rights for inactivity at Special:PermanentLink/12469095, to request the removal of 'crat rights.  — billinghurst sDrewth 11:11, 21 June 2015 (UTC)

Yyy@lvwikipedia

Status:    Done

The first five comments of the community discussion indicate that there was a consensus to treat bureaucrat rights the same way as sysop rights. Please remove Yyy's bureaucrat flag. --SpeedKing (talk) 08:08, 21 June 2015 (UTC)

Presumably this is a follow-up to the removal of the admin rights for inactivity at Special:PermanentLink/12469095, to request the removal of 'crat rights.  — billinghurst sDrewth 11:12, 21 June 2015 (UTC)

Old WMF staff accounts@mediawiki

Status:    Done
Status:    Done
Status:    Done
Status:    Done

These users are no longer working for WMF and and thus their office accounts are locked. So no reason for keeping their adminship. GZWDer (talk) 18:21, 26 June 2015 (UTC)

Done Jalexander--WMF 18:50, 26 June 2015 (UTC)

دالبا@fa.wikipedia

Status:    Done

Hi. Please remove my sysop access on Persian Wikipedia. Thanks. Dalba 15:02, 25 June 2015 (UTC)

 On hold for 1 day per standard practice. --Stryn (talk) 15:57, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
Done. Thanks for your service.--Jusjih (talk) 03:25, 27 June 2015 (UTC)

User Vacio@hywiki

Status:    Done

I am not active (enough) on Armenian Wikipedia, too busy IRL, so I want to stop my admin access for now. vacio 22:58, 26 June 2015 (UTC)

 On hold 24h per standard procedure for self-requests. Linedwell (talk) 01:06, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
Done - Taketa (talk) 06:58, 28 June 2015 (UTC)

[email protected]

Status:    Done

Hi. According to the local policies, Gusgus has not enough administrative actions to be a sysop or a 'crat on eswiki. Requerimment is 50 admin actions on past two years. Please remove his both bureaucrat and administrator flags. Thanks. BetoCG (talk) 22:15, 29 June 2015 (UTC)

removed, einsbor talk 10:31, 30 June 2015 (UTC)

Temporary permissions (expired and rejected requests only)

Matma Rex@global

Per [3]. --Rschen7754 09:47, 3 July 2014 (UTC)

removed Ajraddatz (talk) 04:47, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

User [email protected]

Status:    Done

The reason why I would like to have Adminship in Bengali Wiktionary is because this project is less popular and I think it is for absence of an active admin in here. Priority wise there are lot of works needed to be done like templates and gadgets. Most of them are not working properly. Structure of the Articles are also very much in random order. As I am an active editor in bn.wiktionary for last 3 years I have tried to encourage other editors from our community to edit here but they always complain it is very cumbersome to edit in here. Sujay25 (talk) 20:34, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

Done Granted for 4 months to expire on 2015-06-07. --MF-W 00:51, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
extended Ajraddatz (talk) 03:12, 5 June 2015 (UTC)

[email protected]

Status:    Done

18:18, 7 December 2014 Rschen7754 (talk | contribs | block) changed group membership for User:Ladsgroup@fawikivoyage from autopatroller, IP block exempt, patroller, rollbacker and transwiki importer to autopatroller, IP block exempt, patroller, rollbacker, transwiki importer and administrator (Special:Permalink/10711747 for 6 months) --MF-W 00:54, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

expired --Stryn (talk) 14:20, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
removed --Stryn (talk) 16:30, 10 June 2015 (UTC)

[email protected]

Status:    Done

I have been administrator of Kyrgyz Wkipedia for last two years. Now I want to ask for a permanent admin right. Thanks, --Chorobek (talk) 01:51, 12 December 2013 (UTC)

With just one vote I'm afraid permanent adminship can't be given. But it is Done Granted for 1 year and 6 months to expire on 2015-06-12. . --MF-W 16:48, 12 December 2013 (UTC)
Removed —MarcoAurelio 16:32, 12 June 2015 (UTC)

[email protected]

Status:    Done

The project needs regular maintenance. - Joxemai (talk) 15:32, 7 December 2014 (UTC)

 On hold until 14th December--Shanmugamp7 (talk) 07:18, 8 December 2014 (UTC)
Done Granted for 6 months to expire on 2015-06-14. Ajraddatz (talk) 03:29, 14 December 2014 (UTC)
removed and extended. —MarcoAurelio 16:30, 12 June 2015 (UTC)

[email protected]

Status:    Done

Thanks in advance.--Abbas 11:03, 28 November 2014 (UTC)

  • Done Granted for 6 months to expire on 2015-05-28. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. -- Trijnsteltalk 15:30, 28 November 2014 (UTC)

Note: please see Steward_requests/Permissions#1339861mzb.40ar.wiktionary. --Stryn (talk) 17:28, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

extended --Stryn (talk) 18:08, 21 June 2015 (UTC)

Joachim Mos@ndswiktionary

Status:    Done

I was elected als Admin last year, get the Admin-rights, but I get no massage, that it will end, so it ends automatly. Now I have made a new election, but it seems, nobody is interested in it. There are only two Users aktiv in the wiktionary, but no Admin is aktiv or do something. So I have only one vote for to be a Admin, my own. Can you please give me the admin-rights unlimited? Massages please at: https://nds.wiktionary.org/wiki/Benutzer_Diskussion:Joachim_Mos Sorry my English, it's not good, I know. Thank's --Joachim Mos (talk) 13:44, 14 June 2014 (UTC)

Done Granted for 1 year to expire on 2015-06-14.
--M/ (talk) 14:25, 14 June 2014 (UTC)
removed Ajraddatz (talk) 07:48, 14 June 2015 (UTC)

분당선M@kowikinews

Status:    Done

User request of temp sysop. Was open for +7 days. — Revi 13:41, 13 December 2014 (UTC)

Done Granted for 6 months to expire on 2015-06-14. Ajraddatz (talk) 03:30, 14 December 2014 (UTC)
removed Ajraddatz (talk) 07:48, 14 June 2015 (UTC)

Dan [email protected]

Status:    Done

Since I started to edit on sv.wikivoyage almost a year ago, I seem almost to be the only contributor, its a dead wiki (list of active users). Lately, I have structured with categories, found all the pages with speed delete wish, etc, theres a need of administration and to build up the infrastructure, and try to recruite users. I am prepared to take the challenge to try to build up this wiki, and keep it active, delete pages and user pages with delete request a year ago etc, and for all this I need bureaucrat or admin rights, but theres presently no existing community at all who can vote, after a weeks nomination. Dan Koehl (talk) 17:52, 18 March 2015 (UTC)

 On hold till 19 March 2015. Ruslik (talk) 19:44, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Done Granted for 3 months to expire on 2015-06-19. As your wiki is so small, I wonder how Riggwelter became the only bureaucrat at the first place, that I do not advise anyone having the flag while having too few active users.-- Jusjih (talk) 03:56, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Thank you, wish me good luck in this challenge! Dan Koehl (talk) 04:02, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

Was there any attempt at all to contact the bureaucrat to ask him to do this request locally? --MF-W 10:43, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

No personal contact from my side (I dont know about user user Mippzon), but my nomination was up for a week, as well as another user Mippzon has been for almost a year. The bureaucrat has only been active two days since April 2014, after observing :Openbk message about loosing user rights due to inactivity. Dan Koehl (talk) 14:24, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Removed —MarcoAurelio 09:42, 24 June 2015 (UTC)

[email protected]

Status:    Done

I had been an active contributor to Arabic Wikinews and was granted temporary admin rights several times, last of them for one year, expired about two weeks ago. I am far less active in the project in the last months but I still visit it from time to time to perform cleanup. I wish to renew my temporary admin access. Thanks. PICAWN (talk) 18:05, 28 June 2014 (UTC)

Done Granted for 1 year to expire on 2015-06-29. Continuing administrator, another 12 months  — billinghurst sDrewth 04:12, 29 June 2014 (UTC)
removed --Stryn (talk) 05:26, 29 June 2015 (UTC)

Xusinboy [email protected]

Status:    Done

Please renew for as long as possible. Reasons: normal wiki cleanup --Xusinboy Bekchanov (talk) 18:14, 28 March 2015 (UTC)

Done Granted for 3 months to expire on 2015-06-30. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. -- Jusjih (talk) 00:57, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
removed --Stryn (talk) 13:00, 30 June 2015 (UTC)


Miscellaneous requests

आयातक के अधिकार हेतु (For wikipedia importer rights) चक्रपाणी

Status:    Done

में प्रायः पेज अनुवाद करता हूँ और मुझे प्रायः पेज आयत करने की अवश्यक्ता पड़ती है , thanks, --चक्रपाणी (talk) 00:58, 10 June 2015 (UTC)

Moved from Steward requests/Global permissions#Requests for other global permissions.--GZWDer (talk) 02:54, 10 June 2015 (UTC)
Hi चक्रपाणी, thanks for your request. Have you discussed getting these rights with the local community? Please link to that discussion, or start one if necessary. Also, is this a request for transwiki importer rights (uses the basic Special:Import interface with a pre-selected list of wikis to import from) or full importer with xml-upload capability? Ajraddatz (talk) 03:17, 10 June 2015 (UTC)
He is asking for importer rights on hiwiki. On hiwiki, his nomination can be found at hi:विकिपीडिया:चौपाल#विशेषाधिकार निवेदन. He has been supported by two sysops of hiwiki (me and one other one.). I think there shouldn't be any problem to give him this right for 3 months. If he will work well then we would like to continue his right for future.☆★Sanjeev Kumar (talk) 20:20, 10 June 2015 (UTC)

@Ajraddatz: This is a request for transwiki importer rights that uses the Import interface with a pre-selected list of wikis to import from.-- चक्रपाणी (talk) 12:39, 12 June 2015 (UTC)

Thanks, Done Granted for 3 months to expire on 2015-09-12. Ajraddatz (talk) 15:58, 12 June 2015 (UTC)

धन्यवाद / Thank you -- चक्रपाणी (talk) 23:48, 12 June 2015 (UTC)

User Tchoř@cs.wiktionary

Status:    Done

During the vote on Milda's desysop on Czech Wiktionary, I was asked by several users for voluntary reconfirmation. Because of the atmosphere of suspicion at that time (e.g. possible sockpuppeting; admins and bureaucrats being wildly accused of being biased) and rules on adminship still only in preparation, I have agreed with the community on two step reconfirmation (first reconfirmation of sysop rights, then in case of success reconfirmation of bureaucrat rights) with the voting evaluation being done by the stewards as an independent authority. The voting has ended, so now I ask you if you could evaluate linked reconfirmation. Thanks in advance.--Tchoř (talk) 14:07, 12 June 2015 (UTC)

It this the first reconfirmation? (one for sysop rights) Ruslik (talk) 19:53, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Yes, reconfirmation of sysop (see en:wikt:správce). JAn Dudík (talk) 20:04, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Done reconfirmed. Ruslik (talk) 18:10, 13 June 2015 (UTC)
Could you tell us, how you have evaluted the vote?--Juandev (talk) 20:56, 13 June 2015 (UTC)

[email protected]

Status:    Done

I'm holding an edit-a-thon event at Machala. We're expecting around 20 people to participate, so I'm requesting the noratelimit permission to help create their accounts. Edjoerv (talk) 20:38, 16 June 2015 (UTC)

Done, assigned account creator right. Please indicate when this right is no longer needed. Savhñ 20:53, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
...and removed again, though it seems you did not use the right. Savhñ 21:10, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

[email protected]

Status:    Not done

Admin -jkb- banned me indef but I never did anything wrong to cs.wikisource (on the contrary I added quite a lot of useful content). -jkb- blocked me for posing a question on site rules. The question was formulated in a polite way. -jkb- blocked me because he doesn't like me, probably because in 2006 I supported his archenemy who he had serious wars with. (This user is still blocked indef on cs.wikisource despite the fact he only did few edits on cs.wikisource and none of them was disruptive in any way. This is just to show that -jkb- uses blocks to stop his personal enemies from editing, not to protect the project.) In the RfC -jkb- provided no explanation at all why should a question on site rules be "subversion of the project, transferring conflicts from project to project, trolling and offensive provocation". He mentioned some sockpopping but I was definitely not sockppupeting on cs.wikisource (I did it only in 2006 on cs.wikipedia). I request that I'm ublocked on cs.wikisource. Auvajs (talk) 15:52, 20 June 2015 (UTC)

Not within the Stewards' scope. Please attempt discussing it locally through the appropiate means. Savhñ 19:43, 20 June 2015 (UTC)
How can I discuss it locally if I'm blocked indef there? WTF? I already discuss it here on Meta (see RfC), the results seems evident: -jkb- made a huge mistake and clear misuse of adminship, didn't provide any reasons to support this ban (it's clear since they are none) but I'm still banned. As far as I know it is within stewards scope since they have means to unblock me. --Auvajs (talk) 20:54, 20 June 2015 (UTC)
Yes, that is an important question dear steward. How the user could discuss it locally, when locally blocked?--Juandev (talk) 08:17, 21 June 2015 (UTC)
Try the user's talk page at meta. Preferentially asking that your user talk page at csWS be restored.  — billinghurst sDrewth 11:03, 21 June 2015 (UTC)
As you can see, I already asked -jkb- here on meta: User_talk:-jkb-#Unban request @cs.wikisource, but he simply ignores my request. So I started the RfC. Now, what else can I do? Are admins supposed to ban people who ask for admin rules and method of establishment of admins? Is it OK for admins to ban users they don't like, just because they can? And are there supposed to be admins with no legitimity, after all? --Auvajs (talk) 15:31, 21 June 2015 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Steward_requests/Permissions/2015-06&oldid=24924631"