Jump to content

Steward requests/Bot status/2009-03

Add links
From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki

Global bot requests

Global bot status for SassoBot

Status:    Done

I have over 51,000 edits and already have flags on als, an, ar, ast, ba, be, bh, ca, ceb, cs, de, en, eo, es, et, fr, he, hu, id, ig, io, it, ja, ka, lb, mg, ms, nl, nn, pl, pt, ru, sah, simple, sl, sr, th, uk, vec, vo, wuu, yo, zh, zh-min-nan, zh-yue, zu. Djsasso 13:42, 5 March 2009 (UTC)

I approve of this user's bot. The contributions that it has made over many of the Wikipedias that it has made the changes to have been very helpful and right on target. I definitely believe that this user will use the global bot flag to its' fullest potential. Cheers, Razorflame 17:40, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
SassoBot is well-behaved. -- sj | help translate |+ 01:22, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
I have checked bot edits in some of wikis , for me it seems that is doing accurate so i am Support Support with flagging the bot --Mardetanha talk 19:45, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

done, long term contributions, flags on many wikis, not blocked, consensus here, best regards, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 08:41, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

Global bot status for Rubinbot

Status:    Done

Bot has over 63000 edits, flagged on ru.wiki, uk.wiki, be.wiki, zh-yue, tt.wiki, yi.wiki, en.wiki, wa.wiki, sq.wiki, vec.wiki, sv.wiki, ar.wiki, fr.wiki, de.wiki, sl.wiki, vi.wiki, bn.wiki, an.wiki, ast.wiki, az.wiki, af.wiki, ro.wiki, it.wiki, bar.wiki, es.wiki. It works with interwiki and global bot flag will be really helpful. Thank you! Rubin16 18:58, 12 March 2009 (UTC)

Done, I don't see any problems here and since no objections had been made. Best regards, ---birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 20:02, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

Global bot status for ViskonBot

Status:    Not done

Thank you! Wisconsus 17:56, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

Hello Wisconsus, IMHO this bot has not enough cross-wiki (and overall) edits and does thus not fulfill the requirements (the bot must already be active on several wikis), best regards, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 18:02, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
I agree. --Daniel Mayer (mav) 22:52, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
I agree too. Marking as Not done, and you're welcome to try again in a few months when you have botaccount on more wikis and more edits. Laaknor 23:47, 27 March 2009 (UTC)

Global bot request for TXiKiBoT

Status:    Done
  • Global user: TXiKiBoT (edits (alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA)
  • Discussion: Hello everyone. I would like to ask you to approve global bot status to my bot working on interwiki links. I'm an experienced user, with almost 3 years working on it for the basque wikipedia, and more than 2 years for other wikipedias such as english, french and german. Nowadays, TXiKiBoT has a bot flag in more than 100 Wikipedias, with more than 4.7M edits altogether.

Thank you. TXiKi 11:47, 25 March 2009 (UTC)

Looks ok to me, leaving this open some days so people can comment if they wish to, best regards, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 15:35, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
Spacebirdy: This user has blocks on a few Wikipedias that will need to be rectified before it can become a global bot. I would like to suggest that the user asks Anrie on af.wikipedia, Girdi on ce.wikipedia, and Kemmótar on lmowiki, and also have the user run Special:MergeAccount as well to take care of the several unattached accounts. Cheers, Razorflame 20:05, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
I don't see a problem with these blocks, there are other global bots that have blocks on some wikis, the blocks were not set because it had mal edits or something, just because some people have itchy fingers with unflagged bots, best regards, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 20:31, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
You're right, Spacebirdy. The blocks on cewiki and afwiki were because my bot didn't have a bot flag, but it was perfectly working on interwikis (I've recently requested for an unblock on these 2 wikis). For lmowiki, you can see an explanation here, with a long list of block requests. The change of admins/bureaucrats in late 2007 decided to block my bot. It was automatically creating articles on this wikipedia, requested by the old admins; anyway, the bot worked well. TXiKi 09:04, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
Looks good to me too and I don't see the blocks as an issue due to above explanation. --Daniel Mayer (mav) 22:55, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
I agree with Daniel, and have given the rights and marked as Done Laaknor 23:54, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
Hmmm, apparantly the form for giving access doesn't work right now... But I would have given the access if I could :P Laaknor 00:02, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
There it worked. Done Laaknor 00:10, 28 March 2009 (UTC)

Bot status requests

SpaceBirdyBot@kswiktionary

Status:    Done

Many thanks in advance, best regards, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 12:15, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

Done. --Meno25 12:37, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

SpaceBirdyBot@sawiktionary

Status:    Done

Many thanks in advance, best regards, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 12:15, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

Done and announced on the wiki. --Meno25 12:47, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

SpaceBirdyBot@smwiktionary

Status:    Done

Many thanks in advance, best regards, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 12:15, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

Done and announced on that wiki. --Meno25 12:54, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

SpaceBirdyBot@sowiktionary

Status:    Done

Many thanks in advance, best regards, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 12:15, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

Done --Thogo (talk) 13:26, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

SpaceBirdyBot@zuwiktionary

Status:    Done

Many thanks in advance, best regards, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 12:15, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

Done --Thogo (talk) 13:34, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

VolkovBot@zuwiktionary

Status:    Done

Many thanks in advance, best regards, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 12:15, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

Done --Thogo (talk) 13:36, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

SpaceBirdyBot@ikwiktionary

Status:    Done

Many thanks in advance, best regards, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 12:15, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

Done --Thogo (talk) 13:37, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

Interwicket@ikwiktionary

Status:    Done

Many thanks in advance, best regards, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 12:15, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

Done --Thogo (talk) 13:38, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

SpaceBirdyBot@mywiktionary

Status:    Done

Many thanks in advance, best regards, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 12:15, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

Done --Thogo (talk) 13:45, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

VolkovBot@mywiktionary

Status:    Done

Many thanks in advance, best regards, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 12:15, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

Done --Thogo (talk) 13:45, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

Interwicket@mywiktionary

Status:    Done

Many thanks in advance, best regards, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 12:15, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

Done --Thogo (talk) 13:45, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

RoggBot@mywiktionary

Status:    Done

Many thanks in advance, best regards, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 12:15, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

Done --Thogo (talk) 13:45, 1 March 2009 (UTC)


Interwicket@sswiktionary

Status:    Done

Many thanks in advance, best regards, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 12:15, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

Done --Daniel Mayer (mav) 17:50, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

SpaceBirdyBot@sswiktionary

Status:    Done

Many thanks in advance, best regards, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 12:15, 1 March 2009 (UTC)


Done --Daniel Mayer (mav) 19:20, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

SpaceBirdyBot@urwiktionary

Status:    Done

Many thanks in advance, best regards, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 12:15, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

Done. The backlog has been long, but the community there is too small. Best wish.--Jusjih 19:51, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

VolkovBot@urwiktionary

Status:    Done

Many thanks in advance, best regards, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 12:15, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

Done. The backlog has been long, but the community there is too small. Best wish.--Jusjih 19:52, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

SpaceBirdyBot@omwiktionary

Status:    Done

Many thanks in advance, best regards, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 12:15, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

One vote so far but the local bot request page was orphaned. I just linked it from Talk:Fuula Dura (Main Page). --Daniel Mayer (mav) 18:37, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
Please see wikt:om:special:listbots, that is where they are linked from, thanks, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 18:41, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
Novice users (which are going to dominate smaller wikis) are not necessarily going to be a aware of special pages like that (and if special pages are counted, no page could ever be truly considered orphaned). Best to also have a standard wikilink from a place where novice users might notice it. Even w/o the wikilink, I'm still inclined to grant all the bot requests you have placed here that have at least one local vote for. I'd like to give local users a few days to a week to comment on the previously-orphaned bot request pages that have no votes on them yet. --Daniel Mayer (mav) 18:56, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
But they are very aware of the bots and every bot-owner has his contact info on his pages, they would have contaced us long ago if there had been any problem or if there had been any people at all. I find this very pointy, but please do add links wherever, it will not make any difference, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 18:58, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
I don't intend to be pointy - I'd just like us to make these pages easier for local users to find. --Daniel Mayer (mav) 19:08, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
Granted --Mardetanha talk 21:47, 1 March 2009 (UTC)


VolkovBot@omwiktionary

Status:    Done

Many thanks in advance, best regards, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 12:15, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

One vote so far and the local bot request page was orphaned. I just linked it from Talk:Fuula Dura (Main Page). --Daniel Mayer (mav) 17:58, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
Granted --Mardetanha talk 21:44, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

Interwicket@omwiktionary

Status:    Done

Many thanks in advance, best regards, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 12:15, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

One vote so far and the local bot request page was orphaned. I just linked it from Talk:Fuula Dura (Main Page). --Daniel Mayer (mav) 17:59, 1 March 2009 (UTC)


Granted --Mardetanha talk 21:45, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

SassoBot@bhwikipedia

Status:    Done

This wiki subscribes to automatic approval of interwiki bots. I have been editing for over a week so I now qualify. I already have flags on als, an, ar, ast, ba, be, ca, cs, de, en, eo, es, et, fr, he, hu, id, ig, io, it, ja, mg, nl, pt, ru, sah, simple, sl, sr, sw, th, vec, vo, wuu, yo, zh, zh-min-nan, zh-yue, zu. -Djsasso 15:16, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

Done. Dorgan 15:20, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

Interwicket@klwiktionary

Status:    Done

Local request had been made twice, first time on 21.02-2009 by another user, which I did not see, and opened another request accidentally. Thanks in advance, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 21:07, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

Done. --Erwin(85) 21:57, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

Interwicket@angwiktionary

Status:    Done

Note, that wikty does use the standard bot policy and the bot has both >100 edits and edits >7 days, thanks, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 21:52, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

Done. --Erwin(85) 22:08, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

SpaceBirdyBot@tpiwiktionary

Status:    Done

Many thanks in advance, best regards, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 12:15, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

Local request was made in July. One vote so far but local bot request page was orphaned. It is now linked from the local Talk:Main Page. --Daniel Mayer (mav) 18:12, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

Done. Dorgan 22:02, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

Interwicket@tpiwiktionary

Status:    Done

Many thanks in advance, best regards, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 12:15, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

Local request was made in July. One vote so far and local bot request page was orphaned. It is now linked from the local Talk:Main Page. --Daniel Mayer (mav) 18:13, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

Done. Dorgan 22:04, 3 March 2009 (UTC)


SpaceBirdyBot@uzwiktionary

Status:    Done

Many thanks in advance, best regards, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 12:15, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

No votes so far but request was made in July. --Daniel Mayer (mav) 19:26, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
Why is that a 'but', --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 21:02, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
No votes = bad sign, contrast ("but") with "request was made in July" = good sign. Meaning, nobody has commented but they have had more than enough time to comment. Now there is a vote of support. Request granted. --Daniel Mayer (mav) 03:40, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

SpaceBirdyBot@roa-rupwiktionary

Status:    Done

Many thanks in advance, best regards, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 12:15, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

Local request was made in July. One vote so far but local bot request page was orphaned. It is now linked from the local Talk:Main Page. --Daniel Mayer (mav) 18:18, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

Database roa-rupwiktionary does not exist or is not local. Dorgan 22:09, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

Please enter manually roa_rupwiktionary in special:userrights [1], see also [2] which can be found in the Steward_handbook#Database_prefixes, best regards, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 09:27, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

Done. There is a '_' between the roa and rup, not a '-'. :) Dorgan 09:34, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

Yes, that is the domain, the database prefixes are not always the same as the domain, when there is a - it is usually _ also wikipedia becomes wiki, etc. Best regards, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 10:05, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

Interwicket@roa-rupwiktionary

Status:    Done

Many thanks in advance, best regards, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 12:15, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

Local request was made in July. One vote so far but local bot request page was orphaned. It is now linked from the local Talk:Main Page. --Daniel Mayer (mav) 18:18, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

Database roa-rupwiktionary does not exist or is not local. Dorgan 22:09, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

Please enter manually roa_rupwiktionary in special:userrights [3], see also [4] which can be found in the Steward_handbook#Database_prefixes, best regards, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 09:28, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

Done. Dorgan 09:34, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

VolkovBot@roa-rupwiktionary

Status:    Done

Many thanks in advance, best regards, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 12:15, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

Local request was made in July. One vote so far but local bot request page was orphaned. It is now linked from the local Talk:Main Page. --Daniel Mayer (mav) 18:19, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

Database roa-rupwiktionary does not exist or is not local. Dorgan 22:09, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

Please enter manually roa_rupwiktionary in special:userrights [5], see also [6] which can be found in the Steward_handbook#Database_prefixes, best regards, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 09:28, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

Done. Dorgan 09:34, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

SpaceBirdyBot@jvwiktionary

Status:    Done

Many thanks in advance, best regards, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 12:15, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

Local request was made in July. No votes so far and local bot request page was orphaned. I linked it from Dhiskusi:Kaca Utama (Talk:Main Page). --Daniel Mayer (mav) 18:02, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
Done. A local user commented, and I moved the requests to the community discussion page. —Pathoschild 21:58:11, 04 March 2009 (UTC)

SpaceBirdyBot@bnwiktionary

Status:    Done

Many thanks in advance, best regards, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 12:15, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

Local request was made in July. No votes so far and local bot request page was orphaned. It is now linked from আলাপ:প্রধান পাতা (Talk:Main Pagee). --Daniel Mayer (mav) 18:06, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
Done. —Pathoschild 22:34:51, 04 March 2009 (UTC)

Interwicket@bnwiktionary

Status:    Done

Many thanks in advance, best regards, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 12:15, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

Local request was made in July. No votes so far and local bot request page was orphaned. It is now linked from আলাপ:প্রধান পাতা (Talk:Main Pagee). --Daniel Mayer (mav) 18:07, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
Well, the birdy request was in July, Interwicket more recently. Same difference though. Robert Ullmann 13:20, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
Plus the pages are not orphaned, they are all linked from 'special:listbots' and not unusual pages where on wikts botrequests are made, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 13:23, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
Done. —Pathoschild 22:35:09, 04 March 2009 (UTC)

SpaceBirdyBot@zawiktionary

Status:    Done

Many thanks in advance, best regards, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 12:15, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

Local request was made in July. No votes so far and local bot request page was orphaned. It is now linked from the local Talk:Main Page. --Daniel Mayer (mav) 18:11, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
Done. There is no active community. I moved it to the community portal, and redirected all the likely discussion pages to that. —Pathoschild 22:52:33, 04 March 2009 (UTC)

SpaceBirdyBot@tswiktionary

Status:    Done

Many thanks in advance, best regards, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 12:15, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

Local request was made in July. No votes so far but local bot request page was orphaned. It is now linked from the local Talk:Main Page. --Daniel Mayer (mav) 18:21, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
Done. There is no active community. I moved the bot flag request page to the community portal, and redirected all the likely discussion pages to that. —Pathoschild 23:02:12, 04 March 2009 (UTC)

VolkovBot@tswiktionary

Status:    Done

Many thanks in advance, best regards, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 12:15, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

Local request was made in July. No votes so far but local bot request page was orphaned. It is now linked from the local Talk:Main Page. --Daniel Mayer (mav) 18:21, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
Done. There is no active community. I moved the bot flag request page to the community portal, and redirected all the likely discussion pages to that. —Pathoschild 00:07:59, 05 March 2009 (UTC)

SpaceBirdyBot@tiwiktionary

Status:    Done

Many thanks in advance, best regards, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 12:15, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

Local request was made in June. No votes so far and local bot request page was orphaned. It is now linked from the local Talk:Main Page. --Daniel Mayer (mav) 18:28, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
Done. There is no active community. I moved the bot flag request page to the community portal, and redirected all the likely discussion pages to that. —Pathoschild 00:34:02, 05 March 2009 (UTC)

SpaceBirdyBot@tgwiktionary

Status:    Done

Many thanks in advance, best regards, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 12:15, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

Local request was made in July. No votes so far and local bot request page was orphaned. It is now linked from the local Talk:Main Page. --Daniel Mayer (mav) 18:35, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
Done. There is no active community. I moved the bot flag request page to the community portal, and redirected all the likely discussion pages to that. —Pathoschild 01:11:17, 05 March 2009 (UTC)

Interwicket@jvwiktionary

Status:    Done

I assigned a bot flag to this bot along with the aboverequested SpaceBirdyBot, per local request. —Pathoschild 22:03:10, 04 March 2009 (UTC)

RobotGMwikt@bnwiktionary

Status:    Done

I assigned a bot flag to this bot along with the aboverequested SpaceBirdyBot, per local request. —Pathoschild 22:36:58, 04 March 2009 (UTC)

RobotGMwikt@tswiktionary

Status:    Done

I assigned a bot flag to this bot, per local request. —Pathoschild 00:09:56, 05 March 2009 (UTC)

Interwicket@tswiktionary

Status:    Done

I assigned a bot flag to this bot, per local request. —Pathoschild 00:15:10, 05 March 2009 (UTC)

Darkicebot@euwikipedia

Status:    Done

No action from a bureaucrat in several weeks and my bot has been editing here for over a week without any changes in its' bot status. Thank you for your time, Razorflame 04:20, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

Crat is active less than two weeks ago. Perhaps try messaging crat. -Djsasso 14:48, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
I have sent Kabri an email today regarding the new requests, best regards, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 09:38, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
I also proposed the standard bot policy on that wiki. —Pathoschild 02:15:59, 05 March 2009 (UTC)
I just proposed allowing global bots on this Wikipedia as well. Cheers, Razorflame 17:49, 5 March 2009 (UTC)

locally, best regards, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 10:12, 5 March 2009 (UTC)

RoggBot@thwiktionary

Status:    Done

Thank you! Roggy 10:02, 5 March 2009 (UTC)

Done. Laaknor 10:07, 5 March 2009 (UTC)

Interwicket@arwiktionary

Status:    Done

I was a bit concerned that this wouldn't be seen, as the link on the page above it is still red, but apparently whatever it is supposed to be works (I followed the instructions ;-) Should be noted that there are two local 'crats, but neither active recently. Robert Ullmann 13:20, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

I wrote Chaos on ar.wikipedia, best regards, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 10:09, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
Chaos flagged it a few hours ago, request done, thank you! Robert Ullmann 14:23, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
Perfect :) --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 14:44, 5 March 2009 (UTC)

Interwicket@glwiktionary

Status:    Not done

Thank you! Two 'crats, inactive (although Aricum did one edit yesterday) Robert Ullmann 15:51, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

Hello I have left Aricum a message and written Prevert an email, if they don't respond in a week we will flag the bot from here, best regards, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 10:12, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
Bear in mind that having requests such as these to fulfill helps local bureaucrats be more active and stay engaged with the community (in addition to editing). So working through the process locally is a good thing. -- sj | help translate |+ 01:20, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

Will be done locally by Prevert, best regards, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 16:31, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

Rubinbot@afwikipedia

Status:    Done

Bot's been editing for a week, that is enough for automatic approval. Thank you! Rubin16 13:16, 5 March 2009 (UTC)

Just under a week since it really started editing; and not yet 100 edits. This can wait another day :) I left a comment on the policy page about updating it so it's clear what 'for a week' means. -- sj | help translate |+ 01:45, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
I see three bureaucrats. Please try to ask them first.--Jusjih 03:07, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
I really don't understand you. It is said that wiki uses standard policy, allows automatic approval. And here is said that "the bot must edit without a bot flag for at least a week or make 100 edits on the applicable wikis for demonstration purposes". So, why can't it be done here ? Rubin16 16:24, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
Hello, please, it is no reason to get excited, sj is right, it had not yet have 100 edits, but it is one week per today, so I granted the status, best regards, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 16:28, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
Thank you Rubin16 16:37, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

Rubinbot@azwikipedia

Status:    Done

Bot's been editing for a week, that is enough for automatic approval. Thank you! Rubin16 13:16, 5 March 2009 (UTC)

AZwiki has its local crat , please follow the local procedure --Mardetanha talk 17:45, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
What's the need ? "If automatic approval is explicitly allowed on the wiki, bot operators can request access directly from stewards." It's allowed and I request the flag here. Rubin16 18:07, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
And 'crat is inactive since July 2008, you can see it yourself Rubin16 18:09, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
Granted --Mardetanha talk 18:18, 5 March 2009 (UTC)

Darkicebot@zeawikipedia

Status:    Done

No action from a bureaucrat in a while, no local bureaucrats that I can find, bot has been editing for more than a week and has made roughly 50 edits. Thanks, Razorflame 18:21, 5 March 2009 (UTC)

User:Steinbach seems to be around on de:wp and the incubator. -- sj | help translate |+
I have sent Steinbach an E-Mail from de.wiki. Best regards, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 05:19, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
Ah, and I wrote him on the incubator, which seemed appropriate. Hopefully he will respond. -- sj | help translate |+ 00:01, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
Thank you very much for the help sj and Spacebirdy! Cheers, Razorflame 00:35, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

Done locally. Thnaks for the help all! Razorflame 03:46, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

Darkicebot@brwikipedia

Status:    Not done

Posted local bot flag request on the 31st of December, 2008, no replies to my bot flag request since then. Darkicebot has made more than 480 edits to this Wikipedia. Not sure if there are any active bureaucrats on this project. Thanks, Razorflame 00:32, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

'Crat Neal is active as of today. You can see who the 'crats are by going to the special pages and then just look at their contribs. Try messaging crats prior to bringing requests here to save time. -Djsasso 02:29, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
Left him a message a couple of weeks ago, no response, left him another message. Razorflame 03:33, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

Done locally. Thanks for the help! Razorflame 20:08, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

Darkicebot@cowikipedia

Status:    Done

Posted local bot flag request on the 31st of December, 2008, no replies to my bot flag request since then. Darkicebot has made more than 230 edits to this Wikipedia. Not sure if there are any active bureaucrats on this project. Thanks,

No crats on this wiki. I proposed standard bot policy and global bots. -Djsasso 02:35, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
Done with regard to long local backlog, considerable bot edits, but no local bureaucrat.--Jusjih 03:41, 8 March 2009 (UTC)


Darkicebot@bhwikipedia

Status:    Done

No action from a bureaucrat in a while, no local bureaucrats that I can find, bot has been editing for more than a week and has made roughly 50 edits. Thanks, Razorflame 18:24, 5 March 2009 (UTC)

No bureaucrats, and the bot-to-human ratio on bh is awfully high these days. Bot policy wasn't clear, so I cleaned up the past proposals to implement automatic policies; can't hurt to wait a bit longer. -- sj | help translate |+ 02:06, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
I have taken an interest in local bot policy on this wiki, and made some suggestions there; so I should not be the one closing this request. spacebirdy, if you could respond to this request and the ones below, I would be obliged. -- sj | help translate |+ 00:10, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

done, best regards, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 07:46, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

Robbot@bhwikipedia

Status:    Done

No local bureaucrat, no clear local bot policy. These three bots have been editing for more than a week; meanwhile the local wiki is dead and has had no local editors in that time. Over the past year local editors seem not to use or read the Community Portal where bot requests and the like are made. There is likely a language and wiki-culture barrier b/t the casual users/editors of the site and the interwiki linkers and others leaving announcements in English on the CP. We should find someone to help improve local feedback. Meanwhile, these bots are clogging up RC and making it useless for tracking actual community editing. -- sj | help translate |+ 02:24, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

done, best regards, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 07:46, 9 March 2009 (UTC)


TXiKiBoT@bhwikipedia

Status:    Done

See above. -- sj | help translate |+ 02:24, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

done, best regards, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 07:46, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

Escarbot@bhwikipedia

Status:    Done

See above. -- sj | help translate |+ 02:24, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

done, best regards, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 07:46, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

ArthurBot@bhwikipedia

Status:    Done

See above. A global bot, but the wiki hasn't implemented a bot policy yet. -- sj | help translate |+ 02:24, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

done, best regards, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 07:46, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

Interwicket@mswiktionary

Status:    Done

Implements correct iwiki sort order not in "framework" (bug ticket open for a while now, no response at all). Thank you! Robert Ullmann 10:24, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

Done. Please create a patch file for this bug and I'll commit it to the repository. There's no alphabetic_revised for the Wiktionary family in the repository yet, so I'm assuming you made one. The Wikipedia list probably includes some languages for which there's no Wiktionary project. --Erwin(85) 10:58, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
I have no idea how to create a patch file. I just copied the pedia list, as extra codes in the "putfirst" list have no effect. (which is good enough for a private copy ;-) Should include dodde_order as well, set for sv.wikt (another bug in tracker). Robert Ullmann 13:42, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

Darkicebot@bgwikipedia

Status:    Not done

Posted local bot flag request on the 31st of December, 2008, only one reply on the 3rd of January 2009 by a non-bureaucrat. Not sure if any of the local 'crats are active. Darkicebot has made over 900 edits to this Wikipedia. Thanks, Razorflame 00:30, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

'Crats are active as of today. I have been waiting there as well. As far as I can tell the crats there tend to do a mass +bot every few months. Maybe message Nik and ask him to look at all our request sitting there. -Djsasso 02:27, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
Done. Cheers, Razorflame 03:35, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
I would also note that local policy requires Community approval of at least 3 positive votes is needed. which is probably why our request have not been done. As they don't have many people !voting on requests. -Djsasso 04:21, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

Hello, both local crats are not inactive, please contact them, thanks, best regards, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 08:07, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

Darkicebot@fywikipedia

Status:    Not done

No local active bureaucrats, bot has made 100 edits on this Wikipedia. Thanks for your time, Razorflame 04:04, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

Has a crat that was active only 10 days ago. Try messaging Thuen. -Djsasso 04:17, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

Please contact the local crat, thanks, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 08:11, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

BenopatBot@liwikisource

Status:    Done

Thank you! Benopat 12:59, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

done, best regards, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 08:13, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

Darkicebot@mlwikipedia

Status:    Not done

Not sure if there are any local bureaucrats. Darkicebot has made more than 100 edits on this Wikipedia and a local is begging for the flag to be given. Thanks, Razorflame 20:16, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

Please contact one of the three (two active) local crats, thanks, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 20:30, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
Now done locally. Thanks, Razorflame 14:11, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

Darkicebot@astwikipedia

Status:    Done

No action from a bureaucrat in a while, bot has made more than 100 edits and has been editing here for more than a week. Thanks for your time, Razorflame 04:24, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

This crat responds if you message email him. -Djsasso 14:39, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
I have send the local crat an email regarding the new requests now, best regards, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 09:41, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for the help, Spacebirdy! Razorflame 17:45, 5 March 2009 (UTC)

done, no response from the local crat to my email and last edit late october 2008. Best regards, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 10:47, 11 March 2009 (UTC)

Darkicebot@zh-classicalwikipedia

Status:    Not done

No action from a bureaucrat in a while, bot has made more than 100 edits and has been editing here for more than a week. Thank you for your time, Razorflame 04:29, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

Doesn't look like they even have a crat. Why not help implement standard bot policy so that automatic approval will help others. -Djsasso 14:42, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
Standard bot policy proposed, best regards, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 09:49, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
Standard bot policy accepted. Global bots approved. This request is now obsolete. Razorflame 18:30, 11 March 2009 (UTC)

RoggBot@slwiktionary

Status:    Done

Thank you! Roggy 18:25, 11 March 2009 (UTC)

Done --Meno25 18:39, 11 March 2009 (UTC)

Interwicket@iewiktionary

Status:    Done

Thank you! Malafaya 23:10, 11 March 2009 (UTC)

Done --Meno25 23:49, 11 March 2009 (UTC)

Interwicket@wawiktionary

Status:    Done

Many thanks in advance, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 11:40, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

Done --Meno25 22:03, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

SpaceBirdyBot@wawiktionary

Status:    Done

Many thanks in advance, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 11:40, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

Done --Meno25 22:04, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

[email protected]

Status:    Done

Thank you! Abigor talk 21:52, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

Bot Flag Granted --Mardetanha talk 22:17, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

VolkovBot@pntwikipedia

Status:    Not done

This bot is starting to clog up the recent changes of the newest Wikipedia. Thanks, Razorflame 19:55, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

I propossed standard bot policy and global bot policy. -Djsasso 20:36, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
Hello, please open a local request or we cannot flag the bot, thanks, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 08:14, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
Local request made. Thanks, Razorflame 03:55, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
This wiki now allows global bots so this bot no longer needs a local flag. -Djsasso 17:43, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

SieBot@pntwikipedia

Status:    Not done

This bot is starting to clog up the recent changes of the newest Wikipedia. Thanks, Razorflame 19:55, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

I propossed standard bot policy and global bot policy. -Djsasso 20:37, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
This wiki now allows global bots so this bot no longer needs a local flag. -Djsasso 17:44, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

Darkicebot@pntwikipedia

Status:    Not done

This bot is starting to clog up the recent changes of the newest Wikipedia. Thanks, Razorflame 20:44, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

You might as well just wait for a couple days, because stewards can't do it until a local request has been made. And my proposal for global bots only has a few days to go and most of these people are global bots so unless it gets rejected all of them will just globalize. -Djsasso 01:23, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
A local request has been made. That is what the link in the discussion section of this request was for. Thanks, Razorflame 03:55, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
You miss the point, the request has to sit for over a week before a steward will usually look at it. Thus, the bot policy propossal will probably go through before that point. -Djsasso 13:15, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
This wiki now allows global bots so this bot no longer needs a local flag. -Djsasso 17:44, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

JAnDbot@pntwikipedia

Status:    Not done

This bot is starting to clog up the recent changes of the newest Wikipedia. Thanks, Razorflame 20:44, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

This wiki now allows global bots so this bot no longer needs a local flag. -Djsasso 17:44, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

TechBot@simplewiki

Status:    Done

I want the bot flag on this user to fix interwiki links. The wiki accepts automacic approval Techman224Talk 03:01, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

Done. —Pathoschild 03:21:02, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

DirlBot@szlwikipedia

Status:    Done

Thank you! Chesnok 16:34, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

done, best regards, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 11:53, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

two bots @siwiki

Status:    Not done
Status:    Not done

Both Darkicebot and NobelBot are interwiki bots, and need no discussion prior to granting flags on this project as per local policy. Thank you! Kylu 17:10, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

Darkicebot is a global bot so they no longer needs a local flag as that wiki approves global bots. -Djsasso 17:16, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
Ah, whoops. :) Kylu 17:32, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
NobelBot does not yet fulfill the requirements per bot policy, best regards, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 19:54, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
Hello Kylu, I am closing this because NobelBot does not seem to become active anytime soon, please feel free to leave a note here again as soon as it has either >100 edits or had been editing for a week, kind regards, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 12:46, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

RoggBot@hywiktionary

Status:    Done

All conditions are fully. Thank you! Roggy 02:13, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

done, best regards, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 12:52, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

RoggBot@uzwiktionary

Status:    Done

Thank you! --Roggy 02:21, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

done, also granted botstatus for Interwicket, which had not yet been done but requested locally, best regards, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 12:53, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

Darkicebot@lijwikipedia

Status:    Done

This Wikipedia allows for automatic approval. Darkicebot has already made the required amount of edits. Thank you, Razorflame 03:30, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

Hello, done for Darkicebot, there are many other bots editing there, they should be flagged as soon as they reach editing >7days, best regards, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 13:06, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
Thank you very much Spacebirdy! Razorflame 16:21, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
Alot of them will probably globalize once the global bots request finishes in I think 3 days. -Djsasso 13:06, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

Interwicket@tkwiktionary

Status:    Done

Many thanks in advance, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 12:45, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

Done --Meno25 13:30, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

TechBot@lijwikipedia

Status:    Done

Bot meets 100 edit requirements and accepts automatic approval. Thanks. Techman224Talk 21:07, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

Done --Meno25 21:13, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

Interwicket@kuwiktionary

Status:    Done

There are two 'crats, one with no edits since 2006, on with none since 2006 except one in 2008. I'm not sure the discussion page is very visible to whatever users are active. (?) Robert Ullmann 13:28, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

Done. The local bureaucrats don't are actives. Alex Pereira falaê 13:51, 19 March 2009 (UTC)


Interwicket@tewiktionary

Status:    Done

Presently running noflag. No 'crats on this wikt; request opened 16.2.9. Thanks, Robert Ullmann 13:42, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

Done --Meno25 13:50, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

TechBot@be-x-oldwikipedia

Status:    Not done

Automanic approval requested. Thanks! Techman224Talk 18:14, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

Has been done locally. --Erwin 18:18, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
I've haven't requested it, I guess someone saw my bot and gave me the bot flag. That's fine. Techman224Talk 13:18, 20 March 2009 (UTC)

TechBot@simplewikibooks

Status:    Not done

There are no local bureaucrats, and the community is very small. Thanks. Techman224Talk 01:51, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

It has been open for one day but there is a big change there will be no more votes. Please grant the botbit. Abigor talk 06:03, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
Hello, the wiki does not use the standard bot policy so the usual time the community should have to add their opinions is one week. Also the local request link does not work, please fix this, thanks, best regards, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 11:51, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
b:simple:WB:ST. Both active sysops have edited with their approval; there are pretty much no other active editors. Microchip08 @simpleWB 17:45, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
Please see the top of this page and "instructions", I am sorry but we have these rules here, Techman224 propose the bot policy which will allow to facilitate the granting of botstatus for interwikibots much easier. Thanks for Your understanding, best regards, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 12:49, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

Just proposed the standard bot policy. Techman224Talk 21:00, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

I want to withdraw this request. I have decided to run my bot only on the Wikipedias for now. Techman224Talk 22:37, 20 March 2009 (UTC)

TechBot@uzwikipedia

Status:    Done

Automatic approval requested, Thank you! Techman224Talk 03:32, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

done, best regards, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 18:06, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

DirlBot@ugwikipedia

Status:    Done

Thank you! Chesnok 16:34, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

Hello, the bot does not yet fulfill the policy, we can leave this request open until it does, best regards, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 19:58, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
Done. —Pathoschild 21:31:09, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

NobelBot@crh wikipedia

Status:    Done

Thank you! Don Alessandro 21:42, 20 March 2009 (UTC)

not yet 7 days editing or >100 edits, if it edits tomorrow it will be 7 days, best regards, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 18:06, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
if it edits tomorrow it will be 7 days
It is, as far as I understand. Don Alessandro 13:15, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
Done--Jusjih 19:45, 22 March 2009 (UTC)

LinkFA-Bot@pdc wp

Status:    Done

Thank you! Guandalug 14:07, 22 March 2009 (UTC)

Done --Thogo (talk) 14:18, 22 March 2009 (UTC)

TechBot@scwikipedia

Status:    Done

This bot has moade over 100 edits, and there is no community. I'm requesting automanic approval. Thanks. Techman224Talk 12:42, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

Hello, this wiki does not suscribe to automatic approval, please open a local request, thanks, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 13:03, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
As a side note, I have just propossed standard bot policy etc there. -Djsasso 13:27, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
I'll wait until the standard bot policy is in place, for now, I'll start an discussion. Techman224Talk 20:48, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
done, best regards, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 18:40, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

TXiKiBoT@kwwikipedia

Status:    Done

Many thanks. --Kw-Moon 15:05, 22 March 2009 (UTC)

I would like to suggest to you that you request global bot status for your bot. I believe that your bot would easily pass it as it has over 4,700,000 edits already. That would solve most of the bot requests on other wikipedias :P. Cheers, Razorflame 17:23, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
Done also for kw:User:Robbot, best regards, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 18:43, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

Xqbot@pdcwiki

Status:    Done

Vote was necessary to additionally allow intrawiki activity. Thank you. --Marbot 13:32, 25 March 2009 (UTC)

Done. Alex Pereira falaê 13:51, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
Thank you --Marbot 15:11, 25 March 2009 (UTC)

Luckas-bot@brwiktionary

Status:    Done

--Lucas Nunes 23:27, 25 March 2009 (UTC)

Done. The local backlog dates from 2008-11-20. There are too few local active users. No vote also means no objection as Interwicket is a bot without any local vote received. Best wish after all.--Jusjih 01:49, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

Luckas-bot@csbwiktionary

Status:    Done

--Lucas Nunes 23:27, 25 March 2009 (UTC)

Done --Meno25 07:42, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

Luckas-bot@hywiktionary

Status:    Done

--Lucas Nunes 23:27, 25 March 2009 (UTC)

Done --Meno25 07:48, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

Luckas-bot@slwiktionary

Status:    Done

--Lucas Nunes 23:27, 25 March 2009 (UTC)

Done --Meno25 07:49, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

Luckas-bot@stwiktionary

Status:    Done

--Lucas Nunes 23:27, 25 March 2009 (UTC)

Done --Meno25 07:51, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

Luckas-bot@swwiktionary

Status:    Done

--Lucas Nunes 23:27, 25 March 2009 (UTC)

Done --Meno25 07:52, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

Luckas-bot@klwiktionary

Status:    Done

--Lucas Nunes 23:27, 25 March 2009 (UTC)

Done --Meno25 07:54, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

Luckas-bot@liwiktionary

Status:    Done

--Lucas Nunes 23:27, 25 March 2009 (UTC)

Done --Meno25 07:56, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

Luckas-bot@lowiktionary

Status:    Done

--Lucas Nunes 23:27, 25 March 2009 (UTC)

Done --Meno25 07:58, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

Luckas-bot@tewiktionary

Status:    Done

--Lucas Nunes 23:27, 25 March 2009 (UTC)

Done --Meno25 08:02, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

Luckas-bot@thwiktionary

Status:    Done

--Lucas Nunes 23:27, 25 March 2009 (UTC)

Done --Meno25 08:02, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

Luckas-bot@urwiktionary

Status:    Done

--Lucas Nunes 23:27, 25 March 2009 (UTC)

Done --Meno25 08:02, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

Luckas-bot@ttwiktionary

Status:    Done

--Lucas Nunes 23:27, 25 March 2009 (UTC)

Done --Meno25 08:02, 26 March 2009 (UTC)


Luckas-bot@cvwikipedia

Status:    Done

I've already contacted the crat, but I haven't received an answer. --Lucas Nunes 23:27, 25 March 2009 (UTC)

Done. --Daniel Mayer (mav) 00:07, 27 March 2009 (UTC)

Luckas-bot@astwiktionary

Status:    Done

Bot policy should be implemented there, but as I've requested local bot status, I'd like to get it. --Lucas Nunes 17:08, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

Done. --Daniel Mayer (mav) 00:19, 27 March 2009 (UTC)

Luckas-bot@kkwiktionary

Status:    Done

--Lucas Nunes 17:08, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

Done. --Daniel Mayer (mav) 00:23, 27 March 2009 (UTC)

Luckas-bot@piwikipedia

Status:    Done

--Lucas Nunes 23:27, 25 March 2009 (UTC)

I would like to approve this bot, but I just wonder if the edits are good enough.--Jusjih 01:41, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
Done seems fine to me, flagged. --Meno25 11:27, 28 March 2009 (UTC)

Techbot@roa-rupwikipedia

Status:    Done

Requesting automatic approval. Thank you! Techman224Talk 02:13, 28 March 2009 (UTC)

Done --Meno25 11:19, 28 March 2009 (UTC)

Luckas-bot@hsbwiktionary

Status:    Done

--Lucas Nunes 14:50, 28 March 2009 (UTC)

Done --Meno25 19:11, 28 March 2009 (UTC)

Luckas-bot@kywiktionary

Status:    Done

--Lucas Nunes 14:50, 28 March 2009 (UTC)

Done --Meno25 19:11, 28 March 2009 (UTC)

TechBot@quwikipedia

Status:    Done

Requesting automatic approval. I think this wiki accepts automatic approval, per this. Thank you! Techman224Talk 20:38, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

Automatic approval is not yet implemented, only proposed. Please wait until either it is implemented or one week after your local request, which would be on 28th. --Thogo (talk) 14:17, 22 March 2009 (UTC)

done, best regards, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 15:21, 29 March 2009 (UTC)

XeBot@arwikinews

Status:    Done

Nice Regards! Orango 20:44, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

Hello, this is confusing, the original request had been made for TrBot, not XeBot, so the supporter supported another bot, [8], please clarify Your edit, thanks, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 18:45, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
Spacebirdy, I create a new robot (XeBot) after voting began, But the two of me (I mean TrBot and XeBot), i create a redirect to User:XeBot in TrBot page with TrBot account for identify my proprietary of the two robots [9], thankyou --Orango 11:42, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
Done, thanks for the explaination, best regards, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 15:20, 29 March 2009 (UTC)

TechBot@yiwikipedia

Status:    Done

Reached 100 edits. Thank you! Techman224Talk 17:32, 30 March 2009 (UTC)

Done --Meno25 21:42, 30 March 2009 (UTC)

TechBot@arcwikipedia

Status:    Done

Automatic Approval. Thank you! Techman224Talk 22:31, 29 March 2009 (UTC)

Hello, the bot is not yet editing for >1 week or having >100 edits, please see Bot_policy#Automatic_approval, we can leave this here open until it has enough edits, but only if it continues to edit there, best regards, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 22:41, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
The bot now has 100 edits. Techman224Talk 16:41, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
Done --Meno25 00:59, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

TechBot@xhwikipedia

Status:    Done

Bot has been editing for seven days. Thank you! Techman224Talk 22:41, 29 March 2009 (UTC)

Done.--Jusjih 00:15, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

Removal of bot status

Retrieved from "https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Steward_requests/Bot_status/2009-03&oldid=5438124"