missing her gentle waves

if you don't already know my name, you can call me Os or Oscea!
27 | they/them | black, autistic & queer | U.S. icon: @wasyago piccrew

hey there! i’m os or oscea, if you don’t already know my name. they/them pronouns (and fae/faer, if you’re feeling sweet). i’m a black queer and autistic person based in the central us who is very tired all the time.

this is my personal blog for fun, fandom, and feels. i post a lot about baking, sewing, libraries, birds, and cats. i’m currently into rwby and sonic the hedgehog, and to a much lesser extent overwatch. i can talk for days about nora, tails, or symmetra! right now, i play pikmin, guild wars 2, animal crossing, cozy grove, minecraft, and a few other things. personal posts are tagged #os thinks.

i write but i don’t share it on this blog for complicated reasons. most folks know my ao3 name. additionally, if you enjoy my writing and would like to drop a tip, you can find me on ko-fi by that name. 🩵

doyoulikethissong-poll:

Do you like this song? #260

Yes I like it, I already know it

Yes I like it, first time listening

No I don’t like it, I already know it

No I don’t like it, first time listening

✨ Please reblog the polls to make them reach out to as many people as possible, but KEEP IT SPOILER-FREE to make people listen to the music with an open mind 💖 Artists and titles will be revealed after the poll’s conclusion, check the original post for an update! ✨

(via golddragon387)

aliavian:

image
image

So I made a sequel today… 😂👌

💛❤️🤎💚😎

sirazaroff:

image
image

Hehehe~

the funny thing about having gotten the only gender affirming body mods that i have any plans for so early in life is that now i have to reckon with the fact that any desire for other mods is NOT a side effect of wanting realistic gender confirmation stuff

tropacant:

have some shitty chaotic pride flags ^^

image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image

check out the rest of the flags on my profile since tumblr has a 10 image limit lol as well as the fixed versions of a few of these cuz I’m big dumb

(via karmaraudenfeld)

ruffboijuliaburnsides:

scientia-rex:

plague-of-insomnia:

kawaii-pigeon:

blackheartbiohazards:

alexdoes-arthere:

blackheartbiohazards:

blackheartbiohazards:

blackheartbiohazards:

spellscarred:

blackheartbiohazards:

blackheartbiohazards:

“I don’t want to read this” is totally valid.

“This is disgusting to me” is totally valid.

“I don’t want to read this because it is disgusting to me” is totally valid.

“I don’t think anyone should be allowed to read or write this because it is disgusting to me” is authoritarian.

image

“I don’t think anyone should be allowed to read or write this because it is disgusting to me” is authoritarian.

Bro, blocking someone and then using their tag like this is, all offence, weak as fuck. Like all you had to say was, na bro I don’t promote pedo protags on this here blog, because I wholly agree with the premise of your argument given contexts (i.e., writing abusive relationships to show the evils, great; writing abusive relationships to show the romance, yikes).

This response is so, so comically shitty within the context of that tag, oh my god.

“I don’t think anyone should be allowed to read or write this because it is disgusting to me” is authoritarian.

image

“I don’t think anyone should be allowed to read or write this because it is disgusting to me” is authoritarian.

image

“Censorship of some topics in fiction and art is good and I would be happy if it were to be enacted in a way I approved of”

and

“some things should be banned from ever being written or read about in fiction”

are both authoritarian viewpoints to hold and express, even if you don’t have the power to enact them.

If you hold these viewpoints you are holding authoritarian viewpoints.

DUDE IT’S PEDO FICS EVERYBODY THINKS THEY’RE NASTY

Let me explain this to you in simple terms.

Something being nasty is not a good reason to ban fiction about it.

If we accept that “something being nasty is a good reason to bad fiction about it” then we give a foot in the door for all the people who truly, genuinely believe that queer people are nasty to ban all queer literature.

This is not about defending bad people this is about defending the freedom of good people from tyranny, you moron.

I think if you take it to its logical extreme. Say, banning people from writing stories of sexual abuse. That could then be said “well ANY talk about sexual abuse is bad.”

And from that, you could ban books that talk about it irl. Or books like how to recover after being abuse. If its not something to be discussed AT ALL.

The fact that I’ve seen this post in some form on my dash like 100x and each time there’s new idiots who do not get that you can’t have *some* censorship.

Either you’re for it or you aren’t.

The moment you agree that something should never, ever exist in fiction is the moment that anything can be banned.

Remember a while back how Tumblr banned a bunch of tags, including many popular innocuous ones that even people who are for censorship used and were upset about?

When censorship happens, stuff YOU like can and will be banned. That’s how it works.

Remember how a bunch of people had their accounts terminated here only last year for writing about their own sexual abuse?

When you ban “pedo” topics, say, any talk of child sexual abuse in any form, that means people can no longer write about their own experiences. It means people cannot educate others so they can learn how to protect themselves or get help from these situations.

Censorship is authoritarian. Full stop.

Even if “everyone” agrees something is “gross” and “shouldn’t exist,” that does not fucking matter.

Do you know who generally believes queer people are gross and shouldn’t exist??

The same people who are banning books left and right solely because they have queer characters or relationships.

The same people who attack and kill queer folk for simply exisiting.

This is not just some fandom matter or a case of being chronically online.

Protecting freedom of expression is essential, and if you do not get that, I don’t know what to say to you.

And the people who keep bringing up child sex abuse as a reason for censorship are doing it very specifically because everyone feels like then they HAVE to agree with the person in favor of censorship.

It’s not that there isn’t widespread societal agreement on this. It’s that they want you backed into a rhetorical corner where you feel compelled to agree with them.

Also, like, we KNOW how this shit shakes out in fandom because it’s happened before.

In 2007, Livejournal capitulated to the “pedophilia and sex crimes!” cries of (hate group) Warriors 4 Innocence, and you know what communities got shut down? Slashfic communities. Sexual assault survivor support communities. Authors who’d written non-smut m/m fic even got caught up in it. It was DEVASTATING to fandom spaces. I think pretty much everyone knew at least one person whose account was literally DELETED, or were a member of a community that was wiped off the map because they were considerate enough to include topics like “sexual assault” or “BDSM” in the profiles under the badly-named category of “interests” to indicate that posts on said blogs or communities may include discussion of things like that. Even if it was for a SUPPORT group. And it was because a group of religious bigots came to LJ and said essentially “EVERYONE thinks it’s gross and that it’s promoting CSA, we should ban it.”

Like, strikethrough and boldthrough were a large part of what propelled AO3 out of a more unfocused conversation on one person’s blog about hosting a site INTENDED for fandom content, into being an actual archive and nonprofit. And it’s a large part of why you won’t find AO3 banning topics that you find “gross”.

Censorship is authoritarian and it will ALWAYS have more collateral damage than you can imagine.

(via nil-elk)

sometiktoksarevalid:

(via myopicfascination)

nevershootamockingbird:

godesssiri:

krispypotato:

purple-ladys-stuff:

image

And you can use their reality to keep them calm if they are panicking! We had a husband who was always panicking trying to find his wife. Telling him she had passed away was not an option, but through the family we figured out their routine and could tell him not to worry, that she was at the salon or getting coffee with MaryAnne and would be home soon. It calmed him down, stopped him from trying to climb out of windows looking for her, and kept him in his own reality.

If you are working with dementia patients and they aren’t your family, try to get small details from the family that can help!

We had an older gent who was always wanting to get in his car and drive off so we would tell him his car was in the workshop. Eventually someone came up with a car of a make and model he’d owned that was non-working so we parked it up in the garden and he used to get in and sit happily behind the wheel and go for ‘drives’ - he even used to give other residents lifts to wherever they thought they were going.

Trying to orient someone with dementia is cruel in the short term and ultimately pointless. You’ll only upset them by trying to tell them the truth and they’ll have forgotten in an hour and be asking after the same long dead people again. My mother has worked in dementia care for over 25 years and will often tell families “So-and-so is happy in their dementia world”

[ image id: a screenshot of an answer to a question regarding dementia. the question asks “how do i answer my dad with dementia when he talks about his mom and dad being alive? do i go along with it or tell him they have passed away?” the answer, written by david mcphee (ph.d. psychologist, therapist) is as follows: 
“enter into his reality and enjoy it. he doesn’t need to be ‘oriented’. thank god the days are gone when people with advanced dementia were tortured by huge calendars and reminders signs and loved ones were urged to ‘orient’ them to bring them to some boring reality.
if dad spends most of his time in 1959, sit with him. ask him questions he didn’t have time for before. ask about people long dead, but alive to him, learn, celebrate heritage. his parents are alive to him. learn more about your grandparents. if he tells the same story over and over, appreciate it as if it’s music, and you come back to the beautiful refrain.
this isn’t ‘playing along to pacify the old guy’, this is an opportunity to communicate and treasure memories real but out of time.”  / end id ]

(via yournewapartment)

luckyladylily:

storyweavingspider:

luckyladylily:

luckyladylily:

So a few months ago there was the discourse about would you rather meet a man or a bear in the woods. I didn’t want to touch it while the discourse was hot and everyone dug in hard because those are not good conditions for nuance, but I waited until today, June 1st, for a specific reason.

I’m not going to take a position in the bear vs man debate because I don’t think it matters. What is really being asked here is how afraid are you of men? Specifically, unexpected men who are, perhaps, strange.

People have a lot of very real fear of men that comes from a lot of very real places. Back when I was first transitioning in 2015 and 2016, I decided to start presenting as a woman in public even though I did not pass in the slightest.

I live in a red state. I knew other trans women who had been attacked by men, raped by men. I knew I was taking a risk by putting myself out there. I was the only visibly trans person in the area of campus I frequented, and people made sure I never forgot that. Most were harmless enough and the worst I got from them was curious stares. Others were more aggressive, even the occasional threat. I had to avoid public bathrooms, of course, and always be aware of my surroundings.

I know how frightening it is to be alone at night while a pair of men are following behind you and not knowing if they are just going in the same direction or if they want to start something - made all the worse for the constant low level threat I had been living under for over a year by just being visibly trans in a place where many are openly hostile to queer people. You have to remember, this was at the height of the first wave of bathroom law discussions, a lot of people were very angry about trans women in particular. My daily life was terrifying at times. I was never the subject of direct violence, but I knew trans women who had been.

I want you to keep all that in mind.

So man or bear is really the question “how afraid of men are you?”, and the question that logically follows is “What if there was a strange man at night in a deserted parking lot?” or “What if you were alone in an elevator with a man?” or “What if you met a strange man in the woman’s bathroom?”

My state recently passed an anti trans bathroom bill. The rhetoric they used was about protecting women and children from “strange men”, aka trans women.

Conservatives hijack fear for their bigoted agenda.

When I first started presenting as a woman the campus apartment complex was designed for young families. The buildings were in a large square with playgrounds in the center, and there were often children playing. I quickly noticed that when I took my daughter out to play, often several children would immediately stop what they were doing and run back inside. It didn’t take me long to confirm that the parents were so afraid of “the strange man who wears skirts” that their children were under strict instructions to literally run away as soon as they saw me.

“How afraid are you of a strange man being near your children?”

I mentioned above that I had to avoid public bathrooms. This was not because of men. It was because of women who were so afraid of random men that they might get violent or call someone like the police to be violent for them if I ever accidentally presented myself in a way that could be interpreted as threatening, when my mere presence could be seen as a threat. If I was in the library studying and I realized that it was just me and one other woman I would get up and leave because she might decide that stranger danger was happening.

Your fear is real. Your fear might even come from lived experiences. None of that prevents the fact that your fear can be violent. Women’s fear of men is one of the driving forces of transmisogyny because it is so easy to hijack. And it isn’t just trans women. Other trans people experience this, and other queer people too. Racial minorities, homeless people, neurodivergent people, disabled people.

When you uncritically engage with questions like man or bear, when you uncritically validate a culture of reactive fear, you are paving the way for conservatives and bigots to push their agenda. And that is why I waited until pride month. You cannot engage and contribute to the culture of reactive fear without contributing to queerphobia of all varieties. The sensationalist culture of reactive fear is a serious queer issue, and everyone just forgot that for a week as they argued over man or bear. I’m not saying that “man” is the right answer. I am saying that uncritically engaging with such obvious click bait trading on reactive fear is a problem. Everyone fucked up.

It is not a moral failing to experience fear, but it is a moral responsibility to keep a handle on that fear and know how it might harm others.

The terfs are big mad about this post. Normally wouldn’t acknowledge it, but one of them said something interesting. Basically, they said that this was denying women their “survival instincts”, which I find a very interesting way to put it because survival instincts are about action, not just the feeling of fear.

I want to highlight the core principles of what I actually said:

“Your fear is real. Your fear might even come from lived experiences. None of that prevents the fact that your fear can be violent.”
“It is not a moral failing to experience fear, but it is a moral responsibility to keep a handle on that fear and know how it might harm others.”

That is the core. That is what any decent person should agree to and keep in mind. I never said you should not act on your survival instincts. I actually listed a couple ways I did myself, such as avoiding bathrooms and removing myself from situations where others might perceive me as a threat.

This isn’t just a trans woman issue, as I said in the post proper. I came at it from that angle because that is my experience, but this is an issue for a number of groups, practically every marginalized group that exists. The one I had in mind and that has been mentioned several times in the notes of this post is how white women’s fear has been weaponized against black men. Really all black people, but since we are talking about fear of men specifically, I’m going to look at it from that angle.

Even if you hate trans women, even if somehow that were the correct position, the two core points still stand. Your fear can be violent, and you have a moral responsibility to be cognizant of that fact. How could your unchecked “survival instincts” hurt a black man? If you are not asking yourself this question then there is a problem.

But radical feminsists are offended by the idea that a woman has a responsibility to not cause harm with their unchecked survival instincts. This is one of the major reasons the original radical feminist movements were so incredibly racist. Sharing a space with a brown woman made them afraid. Kicking out all the brown women was in accordance with their survival instincts.

Now more recent rad fems will claim racial inclusivity and I am sure they believe it, but they still object to the idea that their fear can be harmful and refuse to take responsibility for their actions. That is a racist position because it will cause harm.

I know this is not exactly a revelation, but it is rare to see it so cleanly demonstrated.

I recognize it’s not the point of this but uh

“A few months ago” bestie that was like 2 weeks ago. A month tops?

March 19th was when it started with two videos that collectively got around six and a half million views in one month. The discourse was well on its way over two months ago.

dogmotifz:

“don’t die wondering” is probably my favorite historical lgbt slogan. literally do not die wondering go to the doctor and get on hrt

(via starlightsaphron)

shamebats:

“There’s no thought crimes and no thought heroisms” is honestly such a good piece of life advice.

You could be having the most fucked up problematic thoughts 24/7 but if you treat people with kindness, the good you do is the only thing that matters. But if you have only the purest thoughts and all the correct beliefs, it doesn’t matter one bit if you spend most of your time being an asshole to people.

(via weaseltotheface)

katquasar-art:

image

P24 - Ace

It kinda looks like a lil fuzzy rug. Which I’d make if I knew how.

[Redbubble]

(via katquasar)

prettyinpinkcatgamer:

combaticon:

combaticon:

“ Y'all can’t even boycott Chick-fil-A ” objectively funny and correct to me and I will hear no arguments against it

funny in a sad sort of way to be clear. Yes I’m sure there’s infinite Nuance and if I really put my mind to it I can come up with about 10 different scenarios in one minute about why someone might need to eat at Chick-fil-A but at the end of the day those don’t really apply to a lot of the bitches who are just like “oh but that spicy chicken sandwich though…” Does it? The truth is y'all are weak in the knees and have a spinal column the consistency of almond paste

If you tell me I’m so strong for adhering to any given boycott because food it’s just that good I don’t think it’s funny and I don’t respect you for it I’m just embarrassed that these are the people I have to work with

people who keep eating at chick fil a are exactly like that one guy on reddit who said nestle should be forgiven for the abhorrent, vile crimes against humanity they’ve committed because cocopuffs are yummy

(via disteal)

Next page
Load more content Back to top