Replies: 2 comments 8 replies
-
Add one more -- nu-book-zxing-cpp:
I have no idea why it got this name but I recognize that it would be hard to change it. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
4 replies
-
In the c-API |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
4 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
This is basically the collection of information and conclusions from earlier discussions regarding the subject of names of entities, namespaces, packages, wrappers, etc. I collect this here to spare myself from searching for it again the next time a new wrapper is proposed (see #719).
For reference, please checkout #337 (comment) and the followup discussion as well as #204 (comment). If it were not for the limitation of not allowing '-' in some contexts and historical reasons, I'd prefer if it was called zxing-cpp (most of the time). Even though having different names for the same thing is far from ideal, each of the following has its merits or it's reasoning. I'll do my very best to make the situation not worse.
zxing-cpp:
zxingcpp:
ZXingCpp:
ZXing:
ZXing::ZXing
)ZXing-C++:
zxing:
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions