Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lord Nasty
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Please insert listed sources within the article, thanks. - Mailer Diablo 02:11, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Lord Nasty[edit]
Not sure how this artist is notable for inclusion. I'm having difficulty establishing it. Mercury 03:44, 22 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak keep I thought this had to be a hoax, but here's the interview mentioned in the article. I hate to say it, but it looks like the guy's decently notable. The article will definitely have to be cleaned up, though. GlassCobra 04:02, 22 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak keep per User:GlassCobra. Trevor "Tinkleheimer" Haworth 04:34, 22 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep- per above... what an awesome name.JJJ999 04:41, 22 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep the articst is notable as shown above. Ridernyc 10:27, 22 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep and shoot me now--don't wait until you get home. JJL 23:00, 22 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep if actual qualified citations can be added to the article. RFerreira 08:33, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Keep Some notablity established, probably enough for WP:Music but article is in an appalling state and needs a complete cleanup. A1octopus 17:39, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.