Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Sirius XM Radio channels

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Sarahj2107 (talk) 07:05, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

List of Sirius XM Radio channels[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The channel lineup described in the page has been obsolete for at least two years. Nobody has stepped up to edit the page and bring it current. This information could easily be replaced with a hyperlink to the relevant live page on SiriusXM's site. Dkendr (talk) 18:52, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 19:59, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 19:59, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per WP:LISTPURP as informational WP:SPLIT/supplemental sublist to parent article Sirius XM Radio, as index of notable topics (note that these stations are almost all bluelinked), and as complement to category Category:Sirius Satellite Radio channels per WP:CLN. Nomination fails as WP:NOEFFORT (WP:SOFIXIT!), and further lists of this kind should list historic channels as well as current ones, as the channels don't cease to be notable if they become defunct. postdlf (talk) 17:49, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 15:16, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:34, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Fix, don't delete. 2600:1002:B106:2F:B91D:151E:ADB7:2099 (talk) 15:11, 18 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. I agree with the prior two posts. Just fix the page, but don't delete it. --Skeeball93 (talk) 16:22, 18 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.