Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hayer affidavits

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep, with no prejudice against further editorial solutions regarding the nominated article and the mentioned ones (which btw need to be tagged as well to be explicitly included into an AfD).--Tikiwont 09:08, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hayer affidavits[edit]

article content unverifiable and non-notable. Google search returns only 790 hits. Chris! _ct 03:50, 22 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to nominate the following related articles for deletion:

Chris! _ct 03:54, 22 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Keep This should be merged into Malcolm X and redirect there. If the section on his assassination grows too long, it can be split into its own article. — Ksero 12:27, 22 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

About the other articles, if you want to AfD them and you have considered the alternatives to deletion, then go ahead and AfD them. This AfD only concerns the Hayer affidavits article. — Ksero 12:36, 22 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

- Comment But the article I nominated have nearly no google hits. How do we know that the article is related to Malcolm X. Chris! _ct 19:47, 22 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Keep All Individuals are clearly notable. Another failure to observe Wikipedia:deletion policy from a persistent abuser of the AfD process. AfD interferes with existing efforts to consolidate and reorganize this articles. Alansohn 21:07, 22 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Please learn how to assume good faith and stop making personal comments. I will report you if you continue your incivility and disruptive behavior. Chris! _ct 02:19, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  - Was Wikipedia:deletion policy followed in this case? What steps have you taken to edit and improve these articles as required, before starting this AfD? Alansohn 03:12, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Keep All As I proposed at Talk:Hayer affidavits, I am in the middle of merging these articles into an article about the assassination of Malcolm X. New York just ran an article, "The Man Who Didn’t Shoot Malcolm X" on this very subject. — Malik Shabazz (Talk | contribs) 00:54, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep the main one, and merge the other articles in. But that is an editing decision. Let there be time for the editing--let's not try to do it here.DGG (talk) 03:23, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.