Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris 'Isto' White (American musician)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 15:55, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Chris 'Isto' White (American musician)[edit]

non notable musician whose only claim to fame is that one of his songs has been viewed 400,000 times. Certainly not as notable as lonelygirl15. Has received no recording contract unlike the Arctic Monkeys or Lily Allen Agεθ020 (ΔT • ФC) 19:58, 30 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - 63 unique Google hits, all of them posted videos someplace, blogs or something similar. No reliable sources to indicate that he passes WP:MUSIC. Tony Fox (arf!) 20:24, 30 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Leaving this in would result in a slippery slope for anyone who posts on YouTube. Also, no refs and nothing relible.--Fresh 20:48, 30 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It's entirely possible for someone to become famous, even notable, as a musician through somewhere like YouTube. It is becoming more likely all the time. What we need to decide is — has this happened here? It seems that the commentators here believe it hasn't (I'm assuming they've all actually looked into the matter), and that the article should therefore be deleted. Fair enough. That's a far cry from "Oh no! YouTube!", however. 203.122.238.225 00:45, 31 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Come back when you have an actual contract.Blueboy 96 20:59, 30 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Per nom. --Tλε Rαnδоm Eδι τ оr 22:07, 30 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.