Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Apache Rivet

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. SOFTDELETE for Apache Rivet (nomination was withdrawn for the broader set) j⚛e decker^talk 01:51, 19 February 2015 (UTC)

Apache Rivet

Apache Rivet (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This a bulk deletion nomination for all of the articles in Category:Apache_httpd_modules except for List of Apache modules.

These articles are all for plugins for the Apache HTTP server. I think don't think they're notable according to wp:nsoft: They're just modules which provide a particular feature to Apache. Some of these pages are quite short... just a declaration of what the module is and what it does... and I would imagine there probably isn't any more to say about them without the descending into writing technical documentation.

Since we already have a list article that enumerates apache modules, I propose that we delete these articles and merge content as necessary into List of Apache modules. tommylommykins (talk) 19:51, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

I changed my mind about the bulk nomination because I'm too lazy to nominate all the pages and it would be a waste of time to do so if this nomination was rejected. So let's keep this discussion primarily about Apache Rivet for the time being. tommylommykins (talk) 19:56, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

I have notified USER:OMPIRE and the talk page of Apache HTTP Server about this issue. For clarity I also nominated some articles in this category for deletion under the proposed deletion scheme, but that failed.

• Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2015 January 28. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 20:02, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. EoRdE6^{(Come Talk to Me!)} 20:10, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. EoRdE6^{(Come Talk to Me!)} 20:10, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Rcsprinter₁₂₃ (announce) @ 20:27, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 04:20, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.