Jump to content

Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

    Welcome to the edit warring noticeboard
    Shortcuts
    Update this page

    This page is for reporting active edit warriors and recent violations of restrictions like the three-revert rule.

    You must notify any user you have reported.

    You may use {{subst:An3-notice}} ~~~~ to do so.

    You can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

    Additional notes
    • When reporting a user here, your own behavior will also be scrutinized. Be sure you understand WP:REVERT and the definitions below first.
    • The format and contents of a 3RR/1RR report are important, use the "Click here to create a new report" button below to have a report template with the necessary fields to work from.
    • Possible alternatives to filing here are dispute resolution, or a request for page protection.
    • Violations of other restrictions, like WP:1RR violations, may also be brought here. Your report should include two reverts that occurred within a 24-hour period, and a link to where the 1RR restriction was imposed.
    Definition of edit warring
    Edit warring is a behavior, typically exemplified by the use of repeated edits to "win" a content dispute. It is different from a bold, revert, discuss (BRD) cycle. Reverting vandalism and banned users is not edit warring; at the same time, content disputes, even egregious point of view edits and other good-faith changes do not constitute vandalism. Administrators often must make a judgment call to identify edit warring when cooling disputes. Administrators currently use several measures to determine if a user is edit warring.
    Definition of the three-revert rule (3RR)
    An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Violations of this rule normally attract blocks of at least 24 hours. Any appearance of gaming the system by reverting a fourth time just outside the 24-hour slot is likely to be treated as a 3RR violation. See here for exemptions.

    Sections older than 48 hours are archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.

    Click here to create a new report

    User:Seba guarino reported by User:Soetermans (Result: No violation Blocked 24h + 72h + indef)[edit]

    Page: SpongeBob SquarePants (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

    User being reported: Seba guarino (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

    Previous version reverted to:

    Diffs of the user's reverts:

    1. 17:32, 16 June 2024 (UTC) "/* top */"
    2. 17:17, 16 June 2024 (UTC) "/* top */"
    3. 16:47, 16 June 2024 (UTC) "/* top */"

    Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:

    1. 17:29, 16 June 2024 (UTC) "General note: Unconstructive editing on SpongeBob SquarePants."

    Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:


    Comments:

    New user insists on adding an unnecessary shorthand for a TV series. Three reverts in less than an hour. I myself just hit the undo button again, but reverted myself. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 17:52, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    No violation – there must be four or more reverts within a 24 hour period for the 3-Revert Rule to apply; the links you have provided do not meet these criteria. The first edit isn't a revert, so only two. And they've stopped since then. Daniel Case (talk) 18:37, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Hey Daniel Case, please check again. Behaviour continues. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 19:52, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Also continuing reverting on Teletubbies. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 19:54, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Blocked – for a period of 24 hours Still didn't violate 3RR on either article, but I didn't know they were doing this on more than one article, which is different. Daniel Case (talk) 20:32, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Blocked – for a period of 72 hours after they went right back to this following the block's expiration. Daniel Case (talk) 22:13, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    They've returned with the same edits after the 72-hour block expired [1] [2] Barry Wom (talk) 15:57, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    User:Ustadeditor2011 reported by User:Toddy1 (Result: Blocked for a month from article under CTOPS)[edit]

    Page: Amaravati (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
    User being reported: Ustadeditor2011 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

    Previous version reverted to: [3] Ustadeditor2011 has been edit-warring to remove "Founded by N. Chandrababu Naidu" from the infobox.

    Diffs of the user's reverts: (edit summaries in green)

    1. 08:03, 9 June 2024 (UTC) reverted edit of 04:35, 8 June 2024 (UTC) by Singhal.sasthry, edit summary lead clear
    2. 04:03, 10 June 2024 (UTC) reverted edit of 01:31, 10 June 2024 (UTC) by IP editor, edit summary it is not the individuals that dictates it is the government
    3. 05:43, 10 June 2024 (UTC) reverted edit of 05:20, 10 June 2024 (UTC) by IP editor, edit summary founder is not chandra babu or jagan it is the government, capitals are not found by people, and you first login with username dont disrupt articles
    4. 11:12, 10 June 2024 (UTC) reverted edit of 09:15, 10 June 2024 (UTC) by IP editor, edit summary rv disruptive editing violating 3RR
    5. 16:26, 10 June 2024 (UTC) reverted edit of 13:10, 10 June 2024 (UTC) by IP editor, edit summary rv disruptive IP editing
    6. 02:27, 12 June 2024 (UTC) reverted edit of 12:05, 11 June 2024 (UTC) by IP editor, edit summary updated lead section, clean up it is not founded by naidu, pls stop it
    7. 04:44, 12 June 2024 (UTC) reverted edit of 03:31, 12 June 2024 (UTC) by IP editor, edit summary it is talking about establishment, not individual, stop disrupting the article or will be reported in admin notice board for edit warring
    8. 15:43, 18 June 2024 (UTC) reverted edit of 19:08, 15 June 2024 (UTC) by IP editor, edit summary rv ip disruptive edits clean up heavy vandalism
    9. 02:30, 19 June 2024 (UTC) reverted edit of 17:31, 18 June 2024 (UTC) by Toddy1, edit summary founder is not N Chandrababu Naidu, it is Vasireddy Venkatadri Nayudu how many times I should tell you?
    10. 07:42, 19 June 2024 (UTC) reverted edit of 04:18, 19 June 2024 (UTC) by Toddy1, edit summary see talk page, the name of Amaravti is from the original Amaravathi site founded by Vasiraju stop rubbing your european tactics on articles related to AP and Telangana, we dont need ur manipulations here

    Diff of final warning: 21:25, 18 June 2024 (UTC) by DMacks[reply]

    Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: Talk:Amaravati#Founder in the infobox

    Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page: [4]

    Note that Ustadeditor2011 has warned two of the IP editors that they were edit warring:

    -- Toddy1 (talk) 18:03, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Comments:
    Blocked – for a period of a month from article as a contentious topics block appealable to ArbCom only. They were made aware of CTOPS two weeks ago. I have logged this at CTOPS under IPA, but since the edits in question also involve the infobox this sanction can be seen as coming under that topic area as well. Daniel Case (talk) 02:27, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    User:206.198.189.18 reported by User:BlueboyLINY (Result: Blocked 31h)[edit]

    Page: Richard Clarkin (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

    User being reported: 206.198.189.18 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

    Previous version reverted to:

    Diffs of the user's reverts:

    1. 04:49, 20 June 2024 (UTC) "my edit is the very definition of a constructive addition to wikipedia, and i will continue to add it as i think you are a edit fascist who thinks they own this site"
    2. 04:40, 20 June 2024 (UTC) "this is utterly absurd, i am trying to be helpful"
    3. 04:20, 20 June 2024 (UTC) "you have got to be kidding me, none of his performances are cited, but you undo this one, just go to his frigging imdb page"
    4. Consecutive edits made from 00:37, 20 June 2024 (UTC) to 00:42, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
      1. 00:37, 20 June 2024 (UTC) "/* Television */"
      2. 00:42, 20 June 2024 (UTC) ""

    Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:

    1. 03:38, 20 June 2024 (UTC) "Note: Addition of unsourced or improperly cited material (UV 0.1.5)"
    2. 03:39, 20 June 2024 (UTC) "Note: Addition of unsourced or improperly cited material (UV 0.1.5)"
    3. 04:24, 20 June 2024 (UTC) "Caution: Addition of unsourced or improperly cited material (UV 0.1.5)"
    4. 04:24, 20 June 2024 (UTC) "Caution: Addition of unsourced or improperly cited material (UV 0.1.5)"
    5. 04:25, 20 June 2024 (UTC) "Caution: Addition of unsourced or improperly cited material (UV 0.1.5)"
    6. 04:26, 20 June 2024 (UTC) "Note: Addition of unsourced or improperly cited material (UV 0.1.5)"
    7. 04:41, 20 June 2024 (UTC) "Warning: Disruptive editing (UV 0.1.5)"
    8. 04:42, 20 June 2024 (UTC) "Warning: Disruptive editing (UV 0.1.5)"
    9. 04:43, 20 June 2024 (UTC) "Warning: Disruptive editing (UV 0.1.5)"
    10. 04:43, 20 June 2024 (UTC) "Note: Unconstructive editing (UV 0.1.5)"
    11. 03:38, 20 June 2024 (UTC) "Note: Addition of unsourced or improperly cited material (UV 0.1.5)"
    12. 03:39, 20 June 2024 (UTC) "Note: Addition of unsourced or improperly cited material (UV 0.1.5)"
    13. 04:24, 20 June 2024 (UTC) "Caution: Addition of unsourced or improperly cited material (UV 0.1.5)"
    14. 04:24, 20 June 2024 (UTC) "Caution: Addition of unsourced or improperly cited material (UV 0.1.5)"
    15. 04:25, 20 June 2024 (UTC) "Caution: Addition of unsourced or improperly cited material (UV 0.1.5)"
    16. 04:26, 20 June 2024 (UTC) "Note: Addition of unsourced or improperly cited material (UV 0.1.5)"
    17. 04:41, 20 June 2024 (UTC) "Warning: Disruptive editing (UV 0.1.5)"
    18. 04:42, 20 June 2024 (UTC) "Warning: Disruptive editing (UV 0.1.5)"
    19. 04:43, 20 June 2024 (UTC) "Warning: Disruptive editing (UV 0.1.5)"
    20. 04:43, 20 June 2024 (UTC) "Note: Unconstructive editing (UV 0.1.5)"

    Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:


    Comments:

    User:Bravehm reported by User:HistoryofIran (Result: Blocked two weeks)[edit]

    Page: Hazaras (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
    User being reported: Bravehm (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

    Diffs of the user's reverts:

    1. 20:19, 24 May 2024
    2. 21:56, 24 May 2024
    3. 23:22, 24 May 2024
    4. 23:31, 24 May 2024
    5. 13:58, 20 June 2024


    Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: [5]

    Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page: [6]

    Comments:

    Manipulate long term edit warring. On 25 May they reverted themselves [7] after being warned of getting blocked by an admin [8]. However, almost a month later, they've went ahead and reverted most of their edit back under the dishonest edit summary "Inappropriate changes, restored sourced info" [9]. In fact, this user constantly engages in manipulation, as you can for example see in the thread where they got warned and their previous edit warring report [10]. --HistoryofIran (talk) 14:10, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    User:Hatekor76 reported by User:PetraMagna (Result: Blocked indefinitely)[edit]

    Page: Yejin Choi (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

    User being reported: Hatekor76 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

    Previous version reverted to:

    Diffs of the user's reverts:

    1. 06:34, 22 June 2024 (UTC) ""
    2. 12:11, 21 June 2024 (UTC) ""
    3. 07:58, 21 June 2024 (UTC) ""

    Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:

    1. 18:27, 21 June 2024 (UTC) "Warning: Addition of unsourced or improperly cited material on Yejin Choi."

    Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:


    Comments:

    Several attempts have been made in edit summaries to let the user provide a source to no avail. The user also has a record of removing content, changing numbers, and altering dates in other articles without an edit summary. PetraMagna (talk) 09:47, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    User:Montigliani reported by User:Miria~01 (Result: Blocked one week)[edit]

    Page: Super League Greece (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
    User being reported: Montigliani (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

    Previous version reverted to: 08:43, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

    Diffs of the user's reverts:

    1. 20:02, 22 June 2024 (UTC) "/* top */"
    2. 17:43, 22 June 2024 (UTC) "/* top */"
    3. 15:37, 22 June 2024 (UTC) "/* top */"
    4. 15:03, 22 June 2024 (UTC) "/* top */



    'Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: 20:25, 22 June 2024 (UTC)

    Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: 20:33, 22 June 2024 (UTC)

    Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page: [diff]

    Comments:

    The user is trying to force his point of view against the consensus without evidence and is ignoring any sources or arguments from other users. Miria~01 (talk) 18:40, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    • Blocked – for a period of one week. Bbb23 (talk) 18:50, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    User:AHI-3000 reported by User:Manyareasexpert (Result: Declined)[edit]

    Page: Stepan Bandera (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
    User being reported: AHI-3000 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

    Previous version reverted to: [11]

    Diffs of the user's reverts:

    1. [12]



    Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: [13] , [14] , [15] , [16] , [17], [18]

    Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: Talk:Stepan Bandera/Archive 4#Misleading categories

    Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page: [19]

    Comments:


    The editor has a track record of pushing contested article categories with edit war.
    Some warnings they received: [20] , [21] , [22] , [23] , [24] .

    It's hard to track warnings received by the editor, since they remove the warnings received from their talk page without archiving them.

    Latest episode: edit [25] that was reverted, they then undo [26] the revert without discussing it.

    Edit [27] which was reverted, they then return [28] the edit without discussing it.

    The latest article is also within Eastern Europe contentious topic, but I'm not sure if they received a CT warning in a past. ManyAreasExpert (talk) 19:09, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    What's your point? These are all separate and unrelated disputes from the past that were resolved. AHI-3000 (talk) 19:56, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    My response to your response [29] which I couldn't post since you deleted it: I'm sorry but if I would know another way to stop you from pushing your changes with edit war, I would use it. You can always undo your changes and start discussing them on a talk page per WP:CONS however. ManyAreasExpert (talk) 20:03, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Declined It sounds as if this is more a matter for AN/I. Daniel Case (talk) 20:55, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    User:Nickodamus reported by User:TechnoSquirrel69 (Result: Partially blocked 2 weeks)[edit]

    Page: Studio Ghibli (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

    User being reported: Nickodamus (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

    Previous version reverted to:

    Diffs of the user's reverts:

    1. 19:42, 22 June 2024 (UTC) "/* Feature films */"
    2. 17:50, 22 June 2024 (UTC) "/* Feature films */ There are inaccuracies in the list"
    3. 16:42, 22 June 2024 (UTC) "/* Feature films */"

    Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:

    1. 18:37, 22 June 2024 (UTC) "Notice: Edit warring stronger wording (RW 16.1)"

    Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:


    Comments:

    Multiple warnings and invitations to the talk page notwithstanding, this user has unfortunately been persistent in restoring their preferred revision. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 19:44, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    The latest revert was #3, so not a 3RR violation yet EvergreenFir (talk) 19:46, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • Partially blocked – for a period of 2 weeks ~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:26, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Edit_warring&oldid=1230465920"