Talk:Gehraiyaan

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Indian cinema task force.

India: Cinema Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Indian cinema workgroup (assessed as Low-importance).

This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report. The week in which this happened:

February 6 to 12, 2022

On 10 March 2022, it was proposed that this article be moved from Gehraiyaan (film) to Gehraiyaan. The result of the discussion was moved.

Bad Synopsis[edit]

The first paragraph of the synopsis (on that note, why is the synopsis more than one paragraph?) - which is also tacked onto the introduction - literally spoils the film in the first sentence and is lazily written overall. Jarrjack (talk) 18:12, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 10 March 2022[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. Per consensus (WP:PTOPIC). (closed by non-admin page mover) —CX Zoom[he/him] ^{(let's talk • C • L)} 12:48, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Gehraiyaan (film) → Gehraiyaan
Gehraiyaan → Gehraiyaan (web series)

– This is the primary article for the title ([1] AryKun (talk) 15:09, 10 March 2022 (UTC) — Relisting. NW1223 <Howl at me•My hunts> 23:21, 17 March 2022 (UTC) — Relisting. ---CX Zoom(^he/_him) (^{let's talk}|_contribs) 06:22, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move of associated article at 13:23, 11 March 2022 (UTC) Also including long-term pageviews graph (scale is logarithmic) for reference. Rotideypoc41352 (talk · contribs) 13:29, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: WikiProject Film has been notified of this discussion. NW1223 <Howl at me•My hunts> 23:22, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: WikiProject India has been notified of this discussion. NW1223 <Howl at me•My hunts> 23:22, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose the second for sure for not conforming to WP:NCTV, but after the page views spiked, they have steadily declined. It seems too soon to claim primary topic with any certainty due to recentism. What's to say they don't continue to decline below the series views in a couple months? -2pou (talk) 23:51, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support as WP:PTOPIC per pageviews, and primary usage in English-language reliable sources (gnews, ghits). Even considering WP:RECENTISM, the film outnumbered the all time views of series by 7x in just couple of months which is pretty much a done deal. In any case, the series should be disambiguated since its not a PTOPIC, and wouldn't get to retain that status just by the virtue of being created first. -- Ab207 (talk) 10:31, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support: The web series cannot be the primary topic as it is hardly as well known as the film. Kailash29792 (talk) 05:19, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support: Per WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. Agreeing with Ab207's & Kailash29792's comment(s). ManaliJain (talk) 05:37, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.