skip to main content
10.1145/3570361.3613281acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmobicomConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Open Access

APG: Audioplethysmography for Cardiac Monitoring in Hearables

Published:02 October 2023Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper presents Audioplethysmography (APG), a novel cardiac monitoring modality for active noise cancellation (ANC) headphones. APG sends a low intensity ultrasound probing signal using an ANC headphone's speakers and receives the echoes via the on-board feedback microphones. We observed that, as the volume of ear canals slightly changes with blood vessel deformations, the heartbeats will modulate these ultrasound echoes. We built mathematical models to analyze the underlying physics and propose a multi-tone APG signal processing pipeline to derive the heart rate and heart rate variability in both constrained and unconstrained settings. APG enables robust monitoring of cardiac activities using mass-market ANC headphones in the presence of music playback and body motion such as running.

We conducted an eight-month field study with 153 participants to evaluate APG in various conditions. Our studies conform to the (Institutional Review Board) IRB policies from our company. The presented technology, experimental design, and results have been reviewed and further improved by feedback garnered from our internal Health Team, Product Team, User Experience (UX) Team and Legal team. Our results demonstrate that APG achieves consistently high HR (3.21% median error across 153 participants in all scenarios) and HRV (2.70% median error in interbeat interval, IBI) measurement accuracy. Our UX study further shows that APG is resilient to variation in: skin tone, sub-optimal seal conditions, and ear canal size.

References

  1. Improving skin tone representation across google. Website, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Onyx ii model 9560 finger pulse oximeter. Website, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. BOSE QC-35 Wireless Headphones. Website, 2020.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Gras 45bb kemar head & torso. Webpage, 2020.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Gras ra0404 prepolarized hi-res ear simulator. Webpage, 2020.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Polar h10 - the gold standard. Webpage, 2020.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. A research space for earable computing. Webpage, 2020.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Samgsung Galaxy Buds. Website, 2020.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Wireless ecg, spo2, ptt and heart rate monitor reference design for medical and consumer wearables. Website, 2020.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Apple airpods. Website, 2021.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Earable: Helping the world sleep better. Webpage, 2022.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Find local maxima. Website, 2022.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Sawtooth wave. Website, 2022.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Zephyr™ performance systems. Website, 2022.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Apx58x b series audio analyzers. Website, 2023.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Developing the monk skin tone scale. Website, 2023.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Gras 12ba, 12be and 12bb ccp power modules with teds support. Website, 2023.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. How many decibels does a human speak normally. Website, 2023.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Rme adi-2 pro fs r black edition. Website, 2023.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Rme fireface ufx+. Website, 2023.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Tascam series 8p dyna. Website, 2023.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Alberto P Avolio, Mark Butlin, and Andrew Walsh. Arterial blood pressure measurement and pulse wave analysis---their role in enhancing cardiovascular assessment. Physiological measurement, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Ananta Narayanan Balaji, Andrea Ferlini, Fahim Kawsar, and Alessandro Montanari. Stereo-bp: Non-invasive blood pressure sensing with earables. In Proceedings of the 24th International Workshop on Mobile Computing Systems and Applications, 2023.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Nam Bui, Nhat Pham, Jessica Jacqueline Barnitz, Zhanan Zou, Phuc Nguyen, Hoang Truong, Taeho Kim, Nicholas Farrow, Anh Nguyen, Jianliang Xiao, et al. ebp: A wearable system for frequent and comfortable blood pressure monitoring from user's ear. In The 25th annual international conference on mobile computing and networking, 2019.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Kayla-Jade Butkow, Ting Dang, Andrea Ferlini, Dong Ma, and Cecilia Mascolo. heart: Motion-resilient heart rate monitoring with in-ear microphones. arXiv preprint arXiv:2108.09393, 2021.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Ishan Chatterjee, Maruchi Kim, Vivek Jayaram, Shyamnath Gollakota, Ira Kemelmacher, Shwetak Patel, and Steven M Seitz. Clearbuds: wireless binaural earbuds for learning-based speech enhancement. In Proceedings of the 20th Annual International Conference on Mobile Systems, Applications and Services, 2022.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Romit Roy Choudhury. Earable computing: A new area to think about. In Proceedings of the 22nd International Workshop on Mobile Computing Systems and Applications, 2021.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Israel Cohen, Yiteng Huang, Jingdong Chen, Jacob Benesty, Jacob Benesty, Jingdong Chen, Yiteng Huang, and Israel Cohen. Pearson correlation coefficient. Noise reduction in speech processing, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Francis A Duck. Medical and non-medical protection standards for ultrasound and infrasound. Progress in biophysics and molecular biology, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Xiaoran Fan, Longfei Shangguan, Siddharth Rupavatharam, Yanyong Zhang, Jie Xiong, Yunfei Ma, and Richard Howard. Headfi: bringing intelligence to all headphones. In Proceedings of the 27th Annual International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking, 2021.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Xiaoran Fan and Trausti Thormundsson. Design earable sensing systems: Perspectives and lessons learned from industry. In EarComp, 2023.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Andrea Ferlini, Dong Ma, Robert Harle, and Cecilia Mascolo. Eargate: gait-based user identification with in-ear microphones. In Proceedings of the 27th Annual International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking, 2021.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Hannes Gamper, Sakari Tervo, and Tapio Lokki. Head orientation tracking using binaural headset microphones. In Audio Engineering Society Convention 131. Audio Engineering Society, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Francis Roosevelt Gilliam III, Robert Ciesielski, Karlen Shahinyan, Pratistha Shakya, John Cunsolo, Jal Mahendra Panchal, Bartlomiej Król-Józaga, Monika Król, Olivia Kierul, Charles Bridges, et al. In-ear infrasonic hemodynography with a digital health device for cardiovascular monitoring using the human audiome. npj Digital Medicine, 2022.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Jon D Hendrix, Jeffrey D Alderson, Chin Huang Yong, and Ryan A Hellman. Feedback howl management in adaptive noise cancellation system, 2019. US Patent 10,290,296.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Yincheng Jin, Yang Gao, Xiaotao Guo, Jun Wen, Zhengxiong Li, and Zhanpeng Jin. Earhealth: an earphone-based acoustic otoscope for detection of multiple ear diseases in daily life. In Proceedings of the 20th Annual International Conference on Mobile Systems, Applications and Services, 2022.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Fahim Kawsar, Chulhong Min, Akhil Mathur, Alessandro Montanari, Utku Günay Acer, and Marc Van den Broeck. esense: Open earable platform for human sensing. In Proceedings of the 16th ACM Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems, 2018.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Wolfgang Klippel. Nonlinear large-signal behavior of electrodynamic loudspeakers at low frequencies. Journal of the Audio Engineering Society, 1992.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Dong Ma, Andrea Ferlini, and Cecilia Mascolo. Oesense: employing occlusion effect for in-ear human sensing. In Proceedings of the 19th Annual International Conference on Mobile Systems, Applications, and Services, 2021.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Monique Moderiano, Maureen McEvoy, Jessie Childs, and Adrian Esterman. Safety of ultrasound exposure: knowledge, attitudes, and practices of australasian sonographers. Journal of Diagnostic Medical Sonography, 2018.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  41. Anh Nguyen, Raghda Alqurashi, Zohreh Raghebi, Farnoush Banaei-Kashani, Ann C Halbower, and Tam Vu. A lightweight and inexpensive in-ear sensing system for automatic whole-night sleep stage monitoring. In Proceedings of the 14th ACM Conference on Embedded Network Sensor Systems CD-ROM, 2016.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. Shahriar Nirjon, Robert F Dickerson, Qiang Li, Philip Asare, John A Stankovic, Dezhi Hong, Ben Zhang, Xiaofan Jiang, Guobin Shen, and Feng Zhao. Musicalheart: A hearty way of listening to music. In Proceedings of the 10th ACM Conference on Embedded Network Sensor Systems, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. Jun Nishimura and Tadahiro Kuroda. Eating habits monitoring using wireless wearable in-ear microphone. In 2008 3rd International Symposium on Wireless Pervasive Computing. IEEE, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  44. International Non-Ionizing Radiation Committee of the International Radiation Protection Association et al. Interim guidelines on limits of human exposure to airborne ultrasound. Health Physics, 1984.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. Sebastian Passler and Wolf-Joachim Fischer. Food intake activity detection using a wearable microphone system. In 2011 Seventh International Conference on Intelligent Environments. IEEE, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. Nhat Pham, Tuan Dinh, Zohreh Raghebi, Taeho Kim, Nam Bui, Phuc Nguyen, Hoang Truong, Farnoush Banaei-Kashani, Ann Halbower, Thang Dinh, et al. Wake: a behind-the-ear wearable system for microsleep detection. In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Mobile Systems, Applications, and Services, 2020.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  47. Tobias Röddiger, Christopher Clarke, Paula Breitling, Tim Schneegans, Haibin Zhao, Hans Gellersen, and Michael Beigl. Sensing with earables: A systematic literature review and taxonomy of phenomena. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies, 2022.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  48. Tobias Röddiger, Daniel Wolffram, David Laubenstein, Matthias Budde, and Michael Beigl. Towards respiration rate monitoring using an in-ear headphone inertial measurement unit. In EarComp, 2019.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  49. Daniel Rouseff, John A Flynn, James A Ritcey, and Warren LJ Fox. Acoustic communication using time-reversal signal processing: Spatial and frequency diversity. In AIP Conference Proceedings. American Institute of Physics, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  50. Fred Shaffer and Jay P Ginsberg. An overview of heart rate variability metrics and norms. Frontiers in public health, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  51. SV Shilko, SP Salivonchik, et al. Calculation of pulse wave parameters with account of blood vessel deformation. Russian Journal of Biomechanics, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  52. Robert R Sokal and Neal L Oden. Spatial autocorrelation in biology: 1. methodology. Biological journal of the Linnean Society, 1978.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  53. Phyllis K Stein, Matthew S Bosner, Robert E Kleiger, and Brooke M Conger. Heart rate variability: a measure of cardiac autonomic tone. American heart journal, 1994.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  54. Wei Sun, Franklin Mingzhe Li, Benjamin Steeper, Songlin Xu, Feng Tian, and Cheng Zhang. Teethtap: Recognizing discrete teeth gestures using motion and acoustic sensing on an earpiece. In 26th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, 2021.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  55. Xue Sun, Jie Xiong, Chao Feng, Wenwen Deng, Xudong Wei, Dingyi Fang, and Xiaojiang Chen. Earmonitor: In-ear motion-resilient acoustic sensing using commodity earphones. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies, 2023.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  56. Conny MA van Ravenswaaij-Arts, Louis AA Kollee, Jeroen CW Hopman, Gerard BA Stoelinga, and Herman P van Geijn. Heart rate variability. Annals of internal medicine, 1993.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  57. Joseph C Volpe Jr. Heart rate monitor for controlling entertainment devices, April 8 2008. US Patent 7,354,380.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  58. Zi Wang, Yili Ren, Yingying Chen, and Jie Yang. Toothsonic: Earable authentication via acoustic toothprint. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies, 2022.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  59. Metin C Yarici, Harry J Davies, Takashi Nakamura, Ian Williams, and Danilo P Mandic. Hearables: In-ear multimodal brain computer interfacing. In Brain-Computer Interface Research. Springer, 2021.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. APG: Audioplethysmography for Cardiac Monitoring in Hearables
            Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

            Recommendations

            Comments

            Login options

            Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

            Sign in
            • Published in

              ACM MobiCom '23: Proceedings of the 29th Annual International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking
              October 2023
              1605 pages
              ISBN:9781450399906
              DOI:10.1145/3570361

              Copyright © 2023 Owner/Author(s)

              Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the owner/author(s).

              Publisher

              Association for Computing Machinery

              New York, NY, United States

              Publication History

              • Published: 2 October 2023

              Check for updates

              Qualifiers

              • research-article

              Acceptance Rates

              Overall Acceptance Rate440of2,972submissions,15%

            PDF Format

            View or Download as a PDF file.

            PDF

            eReader

            View online with eReader.

            eReader