skip to main content
10.1145/3411763.3443435acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
extended-abstract

Onboarding Materials as Cross-functional Boundary Objects for Developing AI Assistants

Published:08 May 2021Publication History

ABSTRACT

Deep neural networks (DNNs) routinely achieve state-of-the-art performance in a wide range of tasks, but it can often be challenging for them to meet end-user needs in practice. This case study reports on the development of human-AI onboarding materials (i.e., training materials for users prior to using an AI) for a DNN-based medical AI Assistant to aid in the grading of prostate cancer. Specifically, we describe how the process of developing these materials changed the team’s understanding of end-user requirements, contributing to modifications in the development and assessment of the underlying machine learning model. Importantly, we discovered that onboarding materials served as a useful boundary object for cross-functional teams, uncovering a new way to assess the ML model and specify its end-user requirements. We also present evidence of the utility of the onboarding materials by describing how it affected user strategies and decision-making with AI in a study deployment to pathologists.

References

  1. [n.d.]. Cancer of the Prostate - Cancer Stat Facts. https://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/prost.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Simon Baron-Cohen. 1991. Precursors to a theory of mind: Understanding attention in others. Natural theories of mind: Evolution, development and simulation of everyday mindreading 1(1991), 233–251.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Emma Beede, Elizabeth Baylor, Fred Hersch, Anna Iurchenko, Lauren Wilcox, Paisan Ruamviboonsuk, and Laura M Vardoulakis. 2020. A Human-Centered Evaluation of a Deep Learning System Deployed in Clinics for the Detection of Diabetic Retinopathy. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–12.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Carrie J. Cai, Samantha Winter, David Steiner, Lauren Wilcox, and Michael Terry. 2019. ”Hello AI”: Uncovering the Onboarding Needs of Medical Practitioners for Human-AI Collaborative Decision-Making. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 3, CSCW, Article 104 (Nov. 2019), 24 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3359206Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Narayan Hegde, Jason D Hipp, Yun Liu, Michael Emmert-Buck, Emily Reif, Daniel Smilkov, Michael Terry, Carrie J Cai, Mahul B Amin, Craig H Mermel, 2019. Similar image search for histopathology: SMILY. NPJ digital medicine 2, 1 (2019), 1–9.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Bonnie E John, Len Bass, Rick Kazman, and Eugene Chen. 2004. Identifying gaps between HCI, software engineering, and design, and boundary objects to bridge them. In CHI’04 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems. 1723–1724.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Charlotte P Lee. 2007. Boundary negotiating artifacts: Unbinding the routine of boundary objects and embracing chaos in collaborative work. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 16, 3 (2007), 307–339.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Margaret Mitchell, Simone Wu, Andrew Zaldivar, Parker Barnes, Lucy Vasserman, Ben Hutchinson, Elena Spitzer, Inioluwa Deborah Raji, and Timnit Gebru. 2019. Model cards for model reporting. In Proceedings of the conference on fairness, accountability, and transparency. 220–229.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Kunal Nagpal, Davis Foote, Yun Liu, Po-Hsuan Cameron Chen, Ellery Wulczyn, Fraser Tan, Niels Olson, Jenny L Smith, Arash Mohtashamian, James H Wren, 2019. Development and validation of a deep learning algorithm for improving Gleason scoring of prostate cancer. NPJ digital medicine 2, 1 (2019), 1–10.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Susan Leigh Star. 1989. The structure of ill-structured solutions: Boundary objects and heterogeneous distributed problem solving. In Distributed artificial intelligence. Elsevier, 37–54.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. [11] David F. Steiner, Kunal Nagpal, Rory Sayres, Davis J. Foote, Benjamin D. Wedin, Adam Pearce, Carrie J. Cai, Samantha R. Winter, Matthew Symonds, Liron Yatziv, Andrei Kapishnikov, Trissia Brown, Isabelle Flament-Auvigne, Fraser Tan, Martin C. Stumpe, Pan-Pan Jiang, Yun Liu, Po-Hsuan Cameron Chen, Greg S. Corrado, Michael Terry, and Craig H. Mermel.2020. (2020). Manuscript under review.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Harold Thimbleby. 1996. Creating User Manuals for Using in Collaborative Design. In Conference Companion on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada) (CHI ’96). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 279–280. https://doi.org/10.1145/257089.257321Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Fumeng Yang, Zhuanyi Huang, Jean Scholtz, and Dustin L Arendt. 2020. How do visual explanations foster end users’ appropriate trust in machine learning?. In Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces. 189–201.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Qian Yang, Aaron Steinfeld, and John Zimmerman. 2019. Unremarkable ai: Fitting intelligent decision support into critical, clinical decision-making processes. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–11.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Yunfeng Zhang, Q Vera Liao, and Rachel KE Bellamy. 2020. Effect of confidence and explanation on accuracy and trust calibration in AI-assisted decision making. In Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency. 295–305.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Onboarding Materials as Cross-functional Boundary Objects for Developing AI Assistants
        Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          CHI EA '21: Extended Abstracts of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
          May 2021
          2965 pages
          ISBN:9781450380959
          DOI:10.1145/3411763

          Copyright © 2021 Owner/Author

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 8 May 2021

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • extended-abstract
          • Research
          • Refereed limited

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate6,164of23,696submissions,26%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader

        HTML Format

        View this article in HTML Format .

        View HTML Format